Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-02-2008 @ 7:15PM
Sagretti said...
Except these changes are all meant to help DKs tank better. There may be nerfs eventually, but I don't see how these changes can be construed as anything but helpful to the class.
Reply
12-03-2008 @ 7:45AM
onetrueping said...
While the changes are largely helpful to DK tanks, it's quite easy to see the changes as being less useful for those DKs who prefer to PVP, particularly with the Rune Strike change. While bursty mitigation and damage dealing are excellent for PvP (ask any Rogue, honestly, or those Ret Paladins that really got to enjoy PvP before they were "rebalanced"), it's far less useful in PvE situations where extended, steady control is more desirable. So, like with the overall class changes that have been occurring, it's not a nerf, or a buff, but just a rebalancing, trying to find that happy medium that makes a class as close to perfect as possible.
And by that, I mean "as close to getting equal amounts of complaints from all sides as possible." I swear, some people.