Didnt QQ much - 3 naffin pages of whinging - followed by a oh well wot concerns us most is - nothing. Wot a climax to his post. Love the only class he compares hunters to is mages. FFS mages are SQUISHY. If a hunter cant beat one, then he needs to learn more. A Mage compared with a hunter eh - well Armour - mail vs cloth, a Pet, that can by itself kill most cruddy mages, oh and lets not forget BM's can be immune to their polys - while the pets are almost immune to their AOE. Yet it has been said in comments that a hunter should be able to out dps a mage too - if thats the case forget mages. Im not saying Hunters have it all rosy by any means, but just because your not immune to the nerf bat - esp as you yourselfs admit you are OP, makes this 3 page monster post seem a bit OTT to say the least.
Personally i feel if he had have used the flowery diplomatic language in his (GC) post , the article would have been about how he wasnt clear and pussyfooting around.
Meh just getting really peeved at WOW insider recently - time to find new blog with slightly diff approach maybe