Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-10-2008 @ 9:08AM
James said...
Oh QQ more, they are handling things fine. This is a game, not a country. "Wahh they talk to use unprofessionally!!"
Reply
12-10-2008 @ 9:47AM
Hudders said...
You just know the same people would be whining if Blizzard did hire a PR person to deal with the masses by way of non-committal rhetoric.
12-10-2008 @ 9:51AM
James said...
The best part is, this post wouldn't exist if the hunter nerfs didn't happen. The author wouldn't care, he wouldn't have posted this. It's disingenuous at best, considering many of the t7 hunters in my guild all agreed these changes made sense.
12-10-2008 @ 10:28AM
jappaex said...
So your *supposed* t7 hunters agreed with the massive halving of the steadyshot ap coefficient? That is a huge nerf that know hunter agrees with. Sure i agree with most of the changes, because Bm hunters were putting out excessive amounts of Dps. However when gc states "Bm hunters were too high, mm and surv fine *lol wtf survival fine??*" and then nerfs the key shot for every single spec it makes me wonder do the Devs even know what a hunter is? The funny thing is there is an interesting topic on EJ about this about how the hunters who reached 6k dps were using stacking buffs and what not *yes some buffs still do stack, although most do not*. Just as interesting is the fact that BM pets have nearly reached the height of their capability because they do only gain a slight percentage of the hunters attributes, and most of their huge damage was coming from the fact that they were fully buffed with the level 80 buffs. I could go on for a lot longer, but to conclude, if you're hunters are fine with all the nerfs *especially the steady shot one* then i think something is wrong with your hunters.
12-10-2008 @ 2:45PM
Timosaro Wallakatchagunga said...
I'm with James on this one, QQ more.
12-10-2008 @ 5:41PM
Thrashnak said...
Jappaex, that tells to just how OP things are when the players can step back and say "yeah, we're OP right now, the change is justified". Nobody wants to be nerfed, but people with common sense can understand the need for balance.
Yeah, it's fun seeing those numbers, it's fun being top DPS barely trying, it can be fun being OP. But when you know you're OP, there's no reason to be upset when it gets fixed. Enjoy it while it lasted and get back to just having fun and actually having to compete.
Trying to justify being OP is just silly. If it were another class you'd have been calling for nerfs, then rebutting their reactions by saying it's fair.
12-10-2008 @ 6:43PM
mcdead said...
/agree James
I hate hunters - I stopped levelling one cause they were soooo easy.
However - I do really enjoy your posts and videos BRK. But this by far is the silliest.