The Queue: For poops and giggles

Welcome back to The Queue, WoW Insider's daily Q&A column where the WoW Insider team answers your questions about the World of Warcraft.
I'm sure The Queue is the last thing you're all interested in the day the PTR goes up, but too bad! You get it anyway! Let's get the Q&A started, eh?
Velina asked...
I have a Shadow Priest I leveled to 34, then had her boosted to level 60 through Recruit-a-Friend level grants. She's now stuck in level 25-30-ish questing greens and SFK blues. I'm wondering what would be the best way to gear her. Would she be able to survive questing in Outland in her very low-level gear, or am I going to have to round up some gold for her?
If you're very careful while doing the first handful of quests, you'll be fine. Take it slow, play it safe, and after your first batch of quests you'll have a few pieces of new gear, which means more Stamina, which means you'll be okay. If you don't want to putter around that long, just hit the auction house. You don't need to spend a lot of money, just buy a couple of pieces of gear with extra stamina. That's pretty much the only thing that will cause an issue that early on: Your HP. If you only have 3,000 hitpoints or something like that, you'll be insanely squishy. As long as you have the hitpoints to survive getting an add or two, you're perfectly safe. Otherwise, time to hit the auction house.
Loudfiero asked...
For poops and giggles, if I stack +Spell Power in my rogue, will my poison damage go up?
I actually don't think it will. If you asked that question a few months ago I would have said yes, but as of Wrath, poisons scale with Attack Power, not Spell Power. I think the top rank of Instant Poison gets 10% of your AP, but not benefit from spell power. All of the poisons have their own coefficients, I just picked the least mathy as my example. All scale with AP.
Shivoa asked...
Has there been any word from Blizzard about increasing the daily quest cap? I'm a casual player and so only at 75 so far but I've already got a list of about 20 daily quests that I could run through to help push my rep and xp (leaving more quests at 80 to try and pay for all the really expensive shinies I can't justify right now) and I'm sure there will be plenty more coming in all the zones I haven't touched yet.
No, we haven't heard anything like that. That doesn't mean they won't do it, but we haven't heard anything about it. In my opinion, I think you would benefit from not worrying about most dailies until 80, and just do the ones that give you reputation for now. Regular quests give more gold when you're level capped but so do dailies, so what order you do them in isn't a huge impact in the long run. I'd think you would want to avoid having your leveling become horribly grindy though, and there are loads of quests. Even when you hit 80 you'll probably have a few whole zones left to run. Try not to focus on dailies too much so you don't burn yourself out before you get to see Icecrown, eh?
ElMouchoLoco asked...
Why did Blizzard, again, the main city to be shared for both factions, even when they know we will have double population, and double lag?
Before I recommend a system upgrade, do you have Shadows turned on? If so, how high? If you have the Shadows slider all the way up, take it down a notch and boggle as you gain 20+ FPS instantly. Very few systems can actually handle the slider being all the way up, because absolutely everything is given a dynamic shadow. Characters, NPCs, buildings, doodads, all of it. It's pretty, but that's intended for very high end machines. The next step down is still very pretty, but gives you a huge boost to your FPS.
If you don't have shadows turned on, you probably should look into upgrading parts of your computer. Without knowing what you're using, I can't make any recommendations beyond making sure you have enough RAM and seeing that your video card isn't excessively outdated. My computer has a brand new CPU and 2 gigs of RAM, but the video card is four years old. Dalaran still goes at a good 30-35 FPS for me, which is lower than when I'm soloing but higher than when I'm in a raid. A new video card would make it run like a dream. I'd like more RAM as well, but it's lower on my upgrade priorities. Dalaran's not that bad on lag at all, especially when you consider a majority of the Horde and the Alliance are split off into two totally opposite ends of the city. I actually think it's better than Shattrath ever was.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Wrath of the Lich King, The Queue






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
jim Dec 11th 2008 5:10PM
Get some RAM and stop QQing. Cities have a great framerate when you get even just a small amount more ram. Ram is super cheap and easy to self install. Don't nerf the game because of your bad computer.
ObiChad Dec 11th 2008 5:28PM
I've got 2GB of RAM and always seem to have some free and yet Dalaran is still laggy as hell for me. Everywhere else is fine, but inside that city, it's crap. Turning down the shadows has helped, but not enough. For whatever reason the city just seems to be harder on systems than almost anything else. I've got a pretty decent video card but the CPU is a bit old. I'm upgrading the motherboard and CPU near Christmas so we'll see if that has an effect.
Kanuris Dec 11th 2008 5:58PM
I just upgraded from 512mb to 2gb ram today. Dalaran becomes bareable, but it's still very choppy compared to the rest of WoW.
beansmoke Dec 11th 2008 6:24PM
2GB is barely enough for Dalaran. I started with 2GB and upgraded to 6. That was, of course, overkill, but it alleviated all of my lag problems in Dalaran. Four of my guildies had the same problem and as soon as they upgraded their RAM *past* 2GB, they were fine.
pudds Dec 11th 2008 6:37PM
Unless you're running a 64 bit CPU (which most of us are) and 64 bit Windows (which most of us aren't), there is no point in going beyond 3GB. You could go 4GB to get dual channel x2, but you'd still be over the 32bit limit.
http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00015.htm
For most people, 2GB coupled with a modern CPU and Video Card should be plenty, particularly if you keep the settings below max.
uncaringbear Dec 11th 2008 7:37PM
I upgraded my RAM from 1GB to 2GB, and there was a noticable improvement in Dalaran, but not a huge one. The machine I primarily play WoW on is old, as is the vid card, an ATI 9800XT. Outside of Dalaran, I still get very acceptable framerates (30-50fps at 1280x1024)) , but I definitely try to avoid Dalaran during peak hours where the fps can drop below 8 fps.
I think WOTLK is probably the final motivation for me to upgrade to a new rig, but it's still a testament to Blizz that the game still runs so well on ancient systems (outside of Dalaran, of course).
Firestride Dec 11th 2008 9:38PM
I bought my laptop a year ago. 2gb ram, 2x2ghz processor, 128mb dedicated video ram. Dalaran destroys my framerate, and about half the time I first get into the city my WoW locks up for about 2 minutes before I have to relog. I am running EVERY video display at its LOWEST setting except for sight distance. When I log into Northrend it takes me over 3 minutes of a loading screen; when I log into the old world it takes less than a minute.
I understand not everyone has a particular problem with Dalaran, but it's very frustrating for those of us who do.
Osi Dec 11th 2008 10:11PM
Holy crap, bad advise all around. You can have up to 4GB ram on a 32bit system. The OS will see less that that, depending on how much hardware you have installed.
On a 32bit system, each process (ie WOW) can only use up to 2GB of ram .. this is a 32bit system restriction. Adding more then that is just ... silly because the program never sees it ... Basic 101 stuff here.
Even on a 64bit system, each process will see more then 2GB of ram per process. Since Wow is a native 32bit EXE, it will see no more then 2GB of RAM. At least, not until Blizz quit being greedy and cheap and create a native 64bit executable. And yes, it's easy, I do it at work and home.
But as we know .. WOW haven't been coded properly ...
If you want less choppy fps, get a better video card with more video ram, NOT system ram.
Anyways, Blizz dropped the ball (again) on the graphics. They forced some non-required graphics features in Wrath, even though most of the wow population do not have Wrath, and will never need those features turned on. These are features that cannot be turned off .. it was forced.
End of rants of facts.
Steve Dec 11th 2008 10:47PM
The 2GB per process limit is a Windows restriction, not a 32 bit CPU limit. 32 bits is the register width and not the address width which is actually 36 bits(64GB).
Windows XP and Vista have a memory limit of 4GB. That was a choice made by Microsoft. In Windows XP, you are limited to 2GB per process, so even if you have 4 GB installed, the maximum amount of RAM available for a user process is 2 GB. The rest is reserved for the system's use. This can be tweaked if you modify your boot.ini file to use up to 3GB max per process.
Anthony Mazel Dec 12th 2008 2:01AM
2GB of ram, old stuff too. (PC3200) and I do just fine in Dalaran. 40FPS+ while running around and a lots going on.
People need to realize when a specific part of the system can be the bottleneck, and tune things to run together. Ram isn't everything, but if your system is in good working condition 2GB is just fine.
2.0 GHZ AMD Opteron 170, 2GB pc 3200 ram, Radeon 4850 512mb video card. (And windows xp :P)
Chris C. Dec 12th 2008 9:07AM
Turn off some of your heavy addons like Quest Helper and Auctioneer if you are running them and you will see some improvement as well.
Robert M Dec 11th 2008 5:12PM
Ziebart,
You did a great job of not answering the question on the last one there. Have you compeletly abandon any independence to be a Blizzard yes man?
I realize you may not actually know the answer and only have a potential solution, but it would be nice if in the process you were able to at least say so or even concede that Blizzard might have made a mistake with the detail and potential population of Dalaran at any given time, especially peak times.
Paggos Dec 11th 2008 5:16PM
So you'd be only happy if he said something negative about Blizzard?
Amai Dec 11th 2008 5:19PM
perhaps he didn't answer it because he was trying to help instead.
not good, i concede, i would rather see an answer to that, but that's ok.
personally i think that it was done for lore reasons. which lore? i have no idea. but lore it is. even if it's broken lore (the horde in dalaran!? (sp?) WHAT!?)
Beatphreek Dec 11th 2008 5:18PM
I don't think he's being a yes man at all... he may not have directly answered the question about why Blizzard chose to develop their game they way they did, but he did point out that there may not really be a problem with it. Many people don't really have an issue with it. The addons that might be installed and the underlying hardware may in fact be the problem.
Robert M Dec 11th 2008 5:24PM
@Paggos,
I would have been happy with an answer that might have questioned the rationale of Blizzard. He did not have to openly criticize, but it does seem like a shaky idea at best given that Blizzard did a great job of addressing TBC issues when it came time to develop Wrath, and yet somehow missed the boat on the Capital city issue. I will admit that Blizzard does some things fantastically, but I would hope that most of us can agree that video cards and ram aside, there were going to be problems with a city that was going the pit stop for most of the server.
Avalant Dec 11th 2008 5:24PM
I don't think he was dodging the question so much as trying to be helpful. Commiserating wouldn't do anything for the person who asked the question or the rest of the readers. Also, considering how overpopulated Shattrath was with people AND NPCs, and how much more was within your draw distance, a city with some higher resolutions and a new shadowing system is a decent trade imo.
Alex Ziebart Dec 11th 2008 5:25PM
I like Dalaran and it runs fine for me. Doesn't mean I'm a yes man. Sorry you don't like it!
Masarah Dec 11th 2008 5:27PM
What the question was asking "Can you please read Blizzards mind and tell me what they were thinking".
Of course he can't give an answer to that sort of thing.
Paggos Dec 11th 2008 5:30PM
"might have questioned the rationale of Blizzard"
Once again, your just looking for him to criticize Blizzard in order to be satisfied. Go QQ somewhere else, ok?