Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-23-2008 @ 8:42AM
Shardrell said...
I had some good times in the old 40 person raids, but I was very happy when they lowered the number of people. Most of the time, only half the raid was worth grouping with. The rest were frequently unpleasant/unskilled/uninteresting/afk people who were just brought along to get the raw numbers up. When the number was lowered to 25, I got to raid with the enjoyable half of my old raid group. :)
Reply
12-23-2008 @ 10:07AM
Gareth said...
Maybe this is where the 40 man argument is more important, maybe there should be 40 man raids so that we can have some people who are not as skilled included?
Then it should not be a problem to make a raid instance where
there are harder bosses included to test the better 40 man groups and the rest a bit simpler.