Blood Pact: How the mighty have fallen, 2008 in review

How did we get here, though? What happened between the class' popularity or should I say notoriety, from early this year to now? I mean, 3.0 happened, right? Blizzard buffed the class, with all three specs having a unique feel and playstyle. The class has never been more viable... on paper. I mean, Warlock DPS is competitive in PvE and that's the plain truth. It's a different game now. All classes can DPS in Wrath, and if they're played right, they'll do incredibly well. This means that playing a Warlock is now seriously hard work.
1. The death of Shadow Bolt spam
My favorite part of 2008 has to be the death of the mind-numbing Shadow Bolt spam build. The introduction of two new tiers of talents and a near-complete overhaul of the trees killed the most popular raiding spec that consisted of killing off the pet -- a sinister but arguably inane technique -- and pressing one button. In Wrath of the Lich King, Warlocks aren't forced to spec just one way in order to be competitive. Sure, some builds might be more efficient than others, but pretty much all three trees are raid-viable. Alright... two trees. Demonology needs a little work.
2. The death of SL/SL
Of course, just as the one viable raid spec died, so did the dominant PvP spec. SL/SL, or the Siphon Life / Soul Link combo, simply isn't good enough anymore. Actually, with the homogenization of cloth gear, Warlock Stamina took a nosedive and with the nerf to Soul Link so did survivability. As frightening as Warlocks used to be in PvP, the abundance of crowd control-breaking effects and immunities coupled with the sheer squishiness of cloth classes, resulted in the decline of Warlocks from the PvP scene.
In fact, in Season 5 so far, Warlocks are the least represented class, scraping the bottom of the ratings barrel. Lower even than the Arena-gimped Hunters. On the other hand, the one tree that's somewhat gimped in raids is the only way to survive more than five seconds in Arenas nowadays. Metamorphosis, as much as I hate that confused 51-point talent, gives Warlocks 30 seconds of nostalgic dominance before crashing back down to reality and exploding five seconds after.
3. The return of Affliction
The newly fire-centric Destruction tree is still very viable, with the hybrid Felguard / Emberstorm 0/41/30 spec popular with some raiders. This is tied in with number 1, but the coolest thing in late 2008 is the return of Affliction to the raiding scene. Sure, it's kind of crazy to play, with so many things to watch and having to constantly cast something, but it's cool that DoTs -- the hallmark of Warlocks -- now actually dish out some competitive PvE pain.
4. The rise of Death Knights
The Flavor-of-the-Month class seems more and more like a real alternative as more people seem to be playing their Death Knights than their old mains. Some of those people used to play Warlocks -- those players who wanted to play something sinister, apply a lot of DoTs, get a free mount, and have an evil pet. Why play a squishy Warlock when you can play a Death Knight in plate? As much as Metamorphosis tanking is fun in concept, being able to actually spec to tank is even better. Sure, Warlocks can summon friends, but who needs that when you can drag enemies to their doom?
5. The improvement of pets
If there's one thing I appreciate about the changes this year, it's the tailoring of demons to fit particular play styles. Demons aren't going to beat out Hunter pets in DPS anytime soon, but at least they're now much better than just fodder for Demonic Sacrifice. If anything, I love how it's all very thematic. Felhunters for Affliction, Imps for Destruction, and Felguards -- as well as the option to change it up -- for Demonology. I don't think demons are quite finished yet, but Blizzard has certainly taken great strides in the right direction.
Filed under: Warlock, Analysis / Opinion, (Warlock) Blood Pact, Wrath of the Lich King






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Shulkman Dec 31st 2008 4:13PM
First of all, mcnoobster can choke on a lump of lard. Seriously... it's just stupid.
Second, I agree with all that's been said. Everytime I log into my lock, I find myself wanting to eat my keyboard within a half hour. Really, it's not good for my blood pressure.
Krugeroff Dec 31st 2008 8:46PM
Even having a level 70 lock who one one of my raiding toons and understanding what the author is saying...
This whole post seems like more of a "here's what makes me cry into my pillow" than anything substantive and useful.
Dear Diary, today I died to another rogue. QQ
That coupled with the (in)frequency of this column make me wonder if it has any relevance at all any more.
I can go look on the WoW forums if I want to read tripe. Please do Wowinsider some justice and try to make a column worty of actually appearing under their header.
Thanks.
Archimald Dec 31st 2008 4:15PM
I still play a warlock for the main reason that I only PvE.....and It's the only class I can play well so it's all I got. I don't know if I just suck at PvP but I always thought Warlocks couldn't do much in a battlefield.
Norm Dec 31st 2008 4:14PM
All I can say is that Zach is 100% right.
Azizrael Dec 31st 2008 4:21PM
I just took on the Grand Master training dummy in Thunder Bluff on my 80 Warlock (53/0/18), followed the EJ recommended rotation, and by the time I ran out of mana (lifetapping seemed like a waste of time) my Recount DPS had not broken 1400. That seems like white damage for melee classes at 80 in PVP.
Haunt has made levelling way more fun, and I like the change to Imp SB's buff, but I feel like I have a way more complicated rotation than most classes with massively underpowered DPS as a result. Bring back SB spam.
Strife Dec 31st 2008 4:22PM
I gotta admiy it. Since WOTLK locks just don't hold the same appeal they use to. i have played my lock for since pre bc. and now...well he just sits in the corner at lv 80 becuase he just has lost out on all the love alot of class's got. i hope the rumors are tru about mabye another hero class before the next exspansion but i doubt it. guess back to leveling alts.
Always Something Dec 31st 2008 4:38PM
I honestly believe that warlocks are in need of some buffs, the current dps output of warlocks regardless of spec is significantly lower than comprable classes - mage / hunter. Personally, I rolled a paladin due to the demand for healers / tanks now, I never have a problem finding a group. I am eager for blizzard to fix the warlock class and buff some of the spells to make locks more viable dps. The new metamorphosis talent is a joke and a poor idea all together, with all the diferent dps types out there now, you would have thougth blizzard would buff locks to be able to compete with other caster classes. I am finding that spamming aoe dmg now is the new trend and more one casts of blizzard, volley etc.
sephirah Dec 31st 2008 4:31PM
Less locks in raids -> more phat loot for remaining locks... :)
Skarlette Jan 1st 2009 1:59PM
And mages, and priests, and boomkin...the occasional non-cloth-wearing healer...
Markainion Dec 31st 2008 4:39PM
Warlock were always the easiest class to advance, do to having a free mount at 40 and being a pet class. Hunters came in second do also having a pet, which makes solo playing much easier, but still had to spend time farming for mount money. Which is no longer much of a deal with it being cheaper and buyable at 30 instead of 40.
Warlock were known to be great at PVP before Burning Crusades, with all the fancy overpowered Demon they could summon, and instant DPS that was hard to stop. But with buffing of other class in PVP, Warlock became mostly desired as instance as major damage dealers. Which blizzards have been trying to remove as well, trying to even out DPS output for all the classes.
Overall I prefer to play my Mage over my Warlock in PVP, mostly because I like the arcane tricky nature, and it has more option than warlock have to play with the my opponents. My Warrior, which has been always my main, has been decline in desire to play as well, but my Warlock, which has long been almost played as much as my warrior now isn’t even on my list. With my Mage replacing it, and me having a 70 paladin already and a 64 level Death Knight on the way up. I am just waiting to see if Blizzard is going to buff or nurf any class before I decide to make the boring climb to 80 with another class.
jbodar Dec 31st 2008 7:13PM
The questing/instancing you had to do for epic mount more than equaled out a free mount at 40. Many people forget this.
Regardless, locks are easy to level because of life drains and lifetaps. They can go forever, if specced right, which is amazing for leveling, plus they have several other tricks to handle adds.
Rich Dec 31st 2008 4:38PM
I pushed my lock to 80 so I could raid with my guild. I've attended one Naxx raid and decided to shelve the Lock. My guild is all bent out of shape because of this, but I've tried to explain to them the lock is a liability. Fire Destruction or Affliction spec the DPS is just not there to keep up at all. Raid utility is marginal at best.
I am leveling my Prot Pally since we need more tanks and the pally is alot more fun to play.
grimlock49 Dec 31st 2008 4:43PM
I leveled my main, a pally, to 80 first. I then leveled my alt, a warlock. I still enjoy the lock to be honest. I tried affliction, demonology and destruction. So far I have to say I enjoy 0/41/30 so far. I have gotten some naxx gear on the alt, not alot, but some and I did 2600 dps in Archavon. That was good enough for 3rd in dps. CoA, Immolate, Incinerate spam and send in felguard. Spell Power increases greatly with spec and getting the pet buffed only helps out your spell power.
silverdragon Dec 31st 2008 4:46PM
I still play my lock for a few reasons, 1. we are rare now, maybe for the wrong reasons, but atleast you dont see a bunch of locks running around like you see pallys and death knights, 2. with my voidwalker and fear, ive been able to solo severally elites that i need to do with a group of 3+ in wrath, i dunno if other classes can do this (maybe those damn DKs), 3. i find it fun to play as a lock.
Kassius Dec 31st 2008 4:46PM
Very nicely written article. exceptionally so :P
Naix Dec 31st 2008 4:54PM
"Death Knight is The Flavor-of-the-Month class"
Why do people keep saying this? Its not the flavor of the month it's the flavor of the expansion. Personally I do play a Death Knight and like him 10x better than my warlock cause he can do more damage than a warlock and get to wear plate. I am telling you classes that can multi function (Druids, Shamans, Paladins, Death knights, Priests, and even Warriors) have the biggest advantage.
Andy Dec 31st 2008 4:57PM
I simply don't have much fun on my lock anymore. Too much crap just to keep competitive DPS. Though affliction has always been about dots and drains, my DK and Pally are simply more fun to play right now.
My Pally can tank while taking very little damage, can produce a very competitive amount of DPS and runs with an almost endless mana pool. I don't even want to talk about the damage he does as ret.
My DK simply does insane damage, with excellent mitigation to back it up, not to mention a full time pet! (yes he is unholy) And I must admit, running around and blowing up dead foes is quite fun as well.
My Lock has always been my #2 most played toon, under my mage, now she has moved to #4...... I am hoping that the incoming Warlock changes remedies that......
Posi Dec 31st 2008 4:58PM
It only makes sense that all the people who played locks because they need an OP class to perform would all jump ship and move to the next OP class to come along.
Azizrael Dec 31st 2008 5:06PM
It's not that we "need to be OP" (I think), it's more that if Warlocks aren't OP then what's the point of us?
Same goes for Rogue, Hunter and Mage. If these four classes can't do ridiculous DPS then why bring us? Warriors and DKs, if you can't get a group as DPS then you can respec as a tank. Paladins and Druids can go tank or healer. Shaman and Priest can respec as healers. What can a Warlock do, besides reroll? Fear (which is utterly nerfed), summon, and conjure healthstones. Polymorph is still the King of CC, with Sap and frost trap valid alternatives.
Rich Dec 31st 2008 5:10PM
Nice to see someone still stuck in the 2006 view of Locks...