World of Warcraft listed as one of the 30 most offensive games
The conservative Christian investment firm, the Timothy Plan, has released a list of the 30 most offensive games on the market (Warning: link is to a PDF file). This list details the areas of sex, nudity, gay / lesbian, violence, cartoon violence, language, comic mischief, drugs, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, demonic, and game addiction as things that are against any "morally responsible" mutual fund to invest in.In other words they don't want you to invest, like they don't, in companies that make games which deal with any of the above areas.
World of Warcraft is on the list. It has an overall score of a 9, which means it is half as offensive as Grand Theft Auto IV. According to the Timothy Plan, WoW is morally deficient in sex, violence, language, alcohol, and game addiction.
Some investors will take this advice, and that's their right to do so.
After the break we'll examine areas in which WoW is morally deficient, according to the Timothy Plan.
Area 1: Sex
"Suggestive Themes: Some suggestively dressed female characters and sexual allusions."
Yup. WoW has some pretty attractive females. Night Elves dancing on mailboxes, Dwarf Priests jumping around in their Tier 2 gear, and don't forget the mating of two sea-lions. /phew!
Area 2: Violence
"Blood, Violence: A reasonable amount of fighting interspersed between various missions. Many attacks can cause enemies to bleed."
I can agree with half of that. There is a reasonable amount of fighting. You have to kill monsters, bad thieves, and your enemy on the battle-field. But unlike the text which the Timothy Plan lives by, there are no descriptions of a man being strung up on a cross with a crown of thorns on.
The second part of the violence statement, that many attacks can cause enemies to bleed, is wrong. The bleed effect is only applyable by a few number of classes and their abilities, and only by a few weapons. By no means are "many attacks" able to do this.
Area 3: Language
"Mild Language: You may find a very occasional 'd*mn.'"
If you think that's language, you should hear what I yell at my computer when I wipe on a raid boss for the umpteenth time.
Area 4: Alcohol
"Use: Players have the opinion of purchasing and consuming alcohol, even the ability to get drunk."
Players also learn an important lesson, when you get drunk you can't walk straight and are extremely less effective in everything you do. In fact, you can't fight well at all while drunk. You might even say that WoW tries to impart the antithesis of what the Timothy Group is trying to say. WoW tells you getting drunk is bad.
Area 5: Game Addiction
"Addiction: Due to the nature of the game and its length, it is extremely addictive. Time limits need to be set when playing the game."
WoW is an addictive game. If you have an addictive personality, then you are at risk of becoming addicted to WoW or any other game. I don't want to get into the physiological responses of the body to addiction, but needless to say, addiction is real and there are physical as well as mental reasons for it.
However with that said, there are lots of other things you can become addicted to as well. Watching TV, drinking, risk taking, sex, or basically anything that releases endorphins into your brain to make you feel good.
While I'll leave it up for you to decide the general merits of this list.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Odds and ends, Blizzard






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 15)
Jehanne Jan 9th 2009 5:04PM
Makes me proud to be a player!
Alrdye Jan 9th 2009 5:21PM
Completely agree.
DrFaust Jan 9th 2009 5:33PM
Not only am I a proud player, but now I have a shopping list for a collection I am totally going to brag about.
rosencratz Jan 9th 2009 6:31PM
I'm offended by this article tbh.
I'm not religious, I already don't believe in this stuff, why do i need to know about stuff that other people believe in that i already don't agree with.
Am i meant to read the article and feel more qualified as a non religious person somehow because I have found something else to disagree with them about? Am i meant to laugh at them because they believe something i don't? Because they've been doing that for a long time... and i've never found it funny... i tend to respect the beliefs of others personally but meh.
The drinking, language, sex and violence topics have actually been raised by non religious groups previously for example... maybe I missed those articles.
In fact upon inspecting the website in which is not linked appropriately in the article it repeatedly states;
"This is not an attempt to ban video games, or dictate whether people should play them. This is purely meant to inform parents who are concerned with the moral content/issues contained in video games and make available to them information which is not easily found."
Nice agenda peddling from Wowinsider...
rosencratz Jan 9th 2009 6:37PM
In fact seeing as the article fails to share the link i will;
http://www.timothyplan.com/ProActive/frame-ProActive-videogame.htm
You may even notice that they are quite apologetic on the subject, reaffirm repeatedly that it'snot an agenda to ban games and it even mentions that some games that are listed "Did Not" fail their screening and that they are only listed because they are popular purchases and to make sure parents know what they're buying... Am i the only one who doesn' t think this is totally fair enough?
Prophetik Jan 9th 2009 7:15PM
@rosencratz
As a Christian I appreciate your honesty and ability to look at this thoughtfully.
Unfortunately in this day and age you don't see that often, especially by bloggers. Headlines & creating controversy is far more desirable and lucrative.
Andy Jan 9th 2009 7:42PM
Holier-than-thou-art nonsense.....
Nonny Jan 9th 2009 8:49PM
Rosencratz:
I agree, and I'm speaking as a pagan here. Considering that this is meant to be a guide for Christian parents as to the appropriateness of certain video games according to their moral guidelines -- I really don't see the problem. They aren't trying to ban video games or tell adults not to play them, which I HAVE seen in the past from some "liberal" organizations.
Faar Jan 9th 2009 9:23PM
Rosencratz:
"Nice agenda peddling from Wowinsider..."
What you say!
Where is the agenda peddling? It's a post informing us about a bunch of silly judgemental religious fanatics criticizing the video game that is the very topic of this entire blog... There's no soapboxing going on from Adam, merely some slightly ironic commentary. If that offends your alledgedly non-religious sensibilities, then allow me to laugh you in the face. :P Please, don't be so over-sensitive.
Actually, I'm a bit surprised WoW gets away with a mere nine on their IMO rather arbitrary scale, considering there's plenty DEMONIC stuff going on in WoW. Seems they haven't played the game all that much before passing judgement on it if they haven't discovered that there's plenty of DEMONIC enemies to kill, an expansion full of DEMONS, and in fact an entire playable class filled with DEMONICNESS. Surely that ought to warrant a score of at least twelve, if not fifteen.
Demons ought to be a lot more wicked (in the original sense of the word) than the guns, hookers and bad language of the GTA series of games in the eyes of anyone stupid enough to believe fairy tales of water covering the entire globe, and the world being repopulated from a pair of every land animal brought aboard a ship... (Nice case of incest there in the Noah family I might add; the bible itself scores roughly 667 on these guys' scale.)
Zaniac Jan 10th 2009 3:06AM
Top 3 offensive religions:
1. Islam
2. Christianity
3. Judaism
Sallix Jan 10th 2009 5:29AM
What they forget is that these games have a rating for a reason. Also reading through it makes me want to buy fallout 3
TomWolf Jan 10th 2009 7:50AM
I don't see why you have the need to reply to each of those claims....WoW is sexual in nature...the female clothings are often very sexual. We got the world largest online brewfest in wow dedicated to getting drunk...alcohol IS encouraged in the game. Why even bother responding to that? And the language part...he did say "Mild" in his statement....why the need to still whine in a silly retort? Don't get this post.
bruce Jan 10th 2009 8:24AM
some ppl really are retardacons,
i think after 4yrs of WOW history, parents of kids who play this game know what it is. i think the ppl who sent out this list, are a little slow to the punch.
/sigh, why cant there be less QQ an more pewpew ?
Relk Jan 12th 2009 10:00AM
"But unlike the text which the Timothy Plan lives by, there are no descriptions of a man being strung up on a cross with a crown of thorns on."
I must admit that I stopped reading after this statement. Is WoW a game that Christian investors should not invest in? Yes! Is it a game that Christians do not play? No!
I understand that this site is a grouping of blog articles and is not representative of the staff as a whole, but I have now lost all respect for Adam as a blogger.
Shulkman Jan 9th 2009 5:04PM
What is gay about WoW? Unless you count me teabagging that orc warrior...
Dominace Jan 9th 2009 5:08PM
Orc females.
NekoDaimyo Jan 9th 2009 5:35PM
That list in the first paragraph isn't what they're tagging WoW with, but all the categories a game might be tagged with.
I am somewhat amused, though, that WoW doesn't have the Demonic tag.
elvendude Jan 9th 2009 5:47PM
@Dominance: I am a homosexual who proudly plays an orc female. :)
Spoonman Jan 10th 2009 12:40AM
Wtf is up with that "Gay & Lesbian" tag for Army of Two?!?
Omg really?! That article is totally nit-picking!
I never even thought of that theme when I was playing it.
Adamanthis Jan 10th 2009 2:18AM
That "Army of Two" description cracked me up. Diamond encrusted weaponry? Two men using a car door as a riot shield? Who looks at that and sees hot gay action?