WoW Insider interview: You Play or We Pay founders

When we posted about the site earlier this week, a lot of readers cried foul. The site's business plan (players pay a fee every month, and then are compensated back money (sometimes more, sometimes less than they originally paid) when their realm is full or suffers downtime. Lots of our commenters called the site a scam (a few of them even suggested, incorrectly, that it was a phishing site), and they all wanted to know more: how could these guys get away with asking for a fee and taking people's money on the promise that they might get some back?
And so, when Tung and Golubovic contacted us at WoW Insider, we were anxious to put those questions to them directly. Were they able to justify the service they're providing (and maybe show Blizzard just how compensation should be done), or are they just trying to take advantage of people already losing gameplay to downtime? You can be the judge -- our exclusive interview is right after the break.
WoW Insider: So the main question we have is how this all works. You say on the site -- obviously, you play or we pay, so there's compensation, but how does it work? If I sign up on the site as someone interested in using your service, what happens?
George Tung: Basically, when a user signs up, they get to add as many characters as they want from whatever realm that they're on -- it doesn't have to be on one specific realm. We limit up to 10 characters per account. Once they add the characters in there, they see right away how much their monthly fee is going to be. We don't hide that -- it comes up on their account page under their character screen.
So you pay a monthly fee, and then what happens? Nothing until downtime?
Tung: Actually it starts right away. How we compensate players is not only downtime, but we datalog all of their information in terms of their realm, and we've been doing that for about six to seven months now, and what we do is, we look at when it's either down or in "high" population mode, meaning even though the server is not down, due to an outage or if it's just maxed out and there's waiting queues, even if the server is high population, it's getting close to max, we compensate during those times as well. Except it's much lower rate than if the realm went down completely.
So you pay out, and how do you pay? It's not cash?
Tung: We have a credit system, so that we compensate for credit, and we have it so that once you reach a certain limit, we can either send a check out, or we can credit toward's next month's compensation, or the last thing that we're working on is just refunding back to the credit card that they used to pay.
Ok. Obviously, as I posted on the site, you don't have any prices, and you said price is basically determined by server. So how much does the service cost? For example, if I entered a character, one of my characters is on Cenarius, which is a pretty high population server. How much would it cost me, first of all, and then what kind of compensation would I get out of that?
Milos Golubovic: We have tools on the site when you sign up. We have basically a compensation estimator, as well as a realm status history tool. I can't give you an exact quote right now, based on calculations, as I can't really do that in my head right now...
I mean in terms of an average character, how much will people pay per month?
Golubovic: I want to say it's close to five or six dollars. It can get as high as, I believe the highest amount is 11.
Tung: But the lowest is much lower than that. Basically level 80s will obviously pay more than a level 10. And obviously if you're on Cenarius, which is a pretty populated realm, it will be more than a new realm that Blizzard just came out with. But one way to check right away is if you add a character into your account, it actually shows you right away, based on your character level and that realm, what it would cost for that month. So it actually automatically generates it for you, so there's no guessing involved. That's already built onto the site.
So the flip side of that is, then -- does my money give me anything other than you paying me back? What's the average payout, then, for a character on a high population realm?
Tung: It's hard to say, because we basically came up with a formula based on what we have datalogged for the last seven months, and we have an average pertaining to lower months, heavier months like December and January and also through the holidays. So we do have a formula calculated so that's basically what we use for our fees. But of course, with patches and with unexpected outages, if that goes up any higher during any month or any given time, you're compensated for that, and that's how players can actually make money by signing up. For example, if a player signed up in November, which was basically a slower month, they would have made up to -- we have a cap at 1.75x what they paid, and actually in December, they would have made that 1.75, because looking at our data for December, basically all of the realms were heavily packed, most of them being maxed for several hours in a day.
So you say your average is about six dollars, and the most you can make off of downtime is about 1.75 that, so on average if I'm paying $6, the most I can get is $10.50.
Golubovic: Right, that's where our principle of -- we kind of want to motivate people to have, we don't want to stop people from playing World of Warcraft, and this is why we allow them to register up to 10 characters, so they can earn 1.75 times that 10 characters. So if they had 10, they can all be 80s if they're really hardcore players, but it's not unheard of to have that many characters from what I understand. They would earn that 1.75 times 10, so it would be close to like three dollars on the six, so that's about thirty dollars.
If everybody got that amount back, obviously you would run out of money really quickly, and that's one reason I think everyone thinks it's a scam, is because basically you're asking people to pay you money, with a chance of you giving them money back. So what would you say to someone who calls that a scam?
Tung: Sure, that's where we want to say, it's not a scam at all. A scam is where we take the money, we don't pay out anything and that's it. Or we take the money and we don't compensate at all. That's not what we're about at all. Of course, we're a new site, people will feel like it's a risk, but looking at some of the comments people made like, "oh, they're going to steal our WoW characters" -- we're not going to do that at all. Actually, we encourage people not to put their password for their WoW account when they're creating our account. There's no possibility that that's one of our goals. And then second of all, when someone is paying us, we're based in Chicago, I mean our company is in Chicago, we're not out of the country. We have a legit business license here -- if anyone needed to contact us, they could, and if they're paying with a credit card, obviously credit cards have their protections that come with. It's not like we're running away. To answer us being a scam, definitely not.
Now, in terms of just taking a risk to see if people actually make money, yes that is a risk. We're taking a risk also, because our calculations were based off of what we have gathered for only six months. It could be very different six months this year, or next year or the years after. So we could end up losing a lot of money by doing this.
Well obviously you're betting that Blizzard won't have another month like December where all the servers were high population and everyone had so much downtime.
Tung: Of course. If Blizzard's servers were at capacity or they were down an extreme amount of days in any given month, we're not anticipating that. If that happens, we lose and the people who signed up actually make money.
Click here for part two, where we talk about whether these guys would use their own site and what Blizzard might think of what they're doing.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Virtual selves, Making money, Interviews
Patch 5.2 interview with Dave Kosak
Inside an old alt's vault
The latest patch 5.2 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 7)
Irshalthra Jan 16th 2009 9:44AM
WI is simply throwing out an article on a new WOW related company. I did not see a promotion in any way. They had a quick article about the company, which created a lot of questions about how it could possibly work. They are simply trying to fill in the gaps.
I believe that anyone who would read the article and IF they get a tingle of "ooooo this is cool" would also read a couple of comments and realize "ooooo this is questionable". I have a tough time imagining the first "oooo" happening...
Naix Jan 16th 2009 9:45AM
So true. Anything that sounds to good to be true....is.
Psy Jan 16th 2009 9:46AM
I totally agree. It's amazing how stupid these guys seem. This interview answered nothing, at least not for and my scam concerns.
I don't need this server, I won't use this service. I have more chance making money off Google AdSense for my sites then off this crap.
I think it's a stupid idea mainly because of your last point. Honestly, web hosting may be cheap but they're going to be losing FAR too much money to warrant anything anyway.
billy Jan 16th 2009 12:55PM
Psy, are you retarded? Did you even read the article? Why are you talking about a webserver? Jesus man ... get a clue.
This service isn't any more risky than health insurance, car insurance, home insurance. You pay a premium to insurance companies for insurance "just in case". You may live your whole life and pay hundreds of thousands of dollars into an insurance plan and never have it pay out, because you are fortunate enough to not have anything happen to you or your property.
How weird, a business that wants to make money? These guys should get a clue, nobody does that! HA-HA-HA
Some of you people need to take off the tin-foil hats and get a goddamn clue, not everyone is out to get you, you cynical bastards.
Jon Jan 16th 2009 9:21AM
I'd like to know what FAIL business school the founders of YouPlayOrWePay.com graduated from.
Naix Jan 16th 2009 9:22AM
YouPayorWePlay.com.
Errr youjust might want to proof read that a little better.
Houston Jan 16th 2009 9:22AM
I'm sure they're using the maths in their favor, just like Vegas. I'm sure some suckers will use it. Thanks, but no thanks.
BigBiker05 Jan 16th 2009 9:25AM
If they gave out prizes it might help them, but I also play a server that only caps out during really high peak on fridays and weekends. Of course I wonder how free realm transfers affects their database. Then again, having a payout cap will prevent exploiters.
Ekimus Jan 16th 2009 9:28AM
Please, do not give these guys any more coverage.
Sharkhunt Jan 16th 2009 11:49AM
^^ This
Starting to think someone at WI has a financial stake in the matter.
Kemikalkadet Jan 16th 2009 9:32AM
It's insurance basically. Works the same as car/home/life insurance.. you keep paying them money and on the chance that something bad happens they'll reimburse you. And yes of course it's designed so that they earn money, otherwise they wouldn't bother to offer the service.
Not sure if it's really a great idea for Wow though. I mean, regular insurance works on the basis that you're planning for something that is impossible to predict i.e. a car crash or a sudden death. With WoW you know if you play on a full realm you're going to get queues sometimes, anyone with any intelligence should have an idea of how often they have to queue and be able to weight it against what they'd recieve back from this site. And of course, it won't be as much as what they paid as this is how insurance works.
Also, i guess this will cover times of extended server outages etc, but blizz has been pretty good in reimbursing for that themselves anyway.
SomeGuy Jan 16th 2009 9:44AM
This is NOT the same as insurance...
If I have car/health/home insurance then they are returning money to me to pay to repair my injury, car, or home...
This is just giving people money and taking a gamble on the fact that you might get paid back at a ratio of 1:1.75...Just like going to a casino and playing cards/craps.
Kemikalkadet Jan 16th 2009 9:58AM
And the money that you get back from this site can be used to pay for more gametime, the guy even said they can return the money in the form of gametime credit.
Although yes, i agree with you it's not exactly the same. You can just take the money from this and do as you will, the whole way the scheme works is structured in the same way as insurance. My point wasn't "this is insurance not gambling" because the two work in similar ways, this sites idea does bare a massive resemblance to the way insurance works.
That also brings up an interesting point, since it is fundementally gambling, are they bound by the same legal framework? Obviously inline gambling has different laws to casinos etc, but does this site have to follow the same guidelines as online poker sites? and if it doesn't right now, should it?
JALbert Jan 16th 2009 4:34PM
This most certainly is insurance. It's horribly set up insurance, as traditional insurance assumes that you're willing to pay a premium to avoid the risk of a hugely costly expense (loss of home, car, bodily function). 15 bucks a month isn't the sort of risk I need to insure.
Second, the payout cap of 1.75 means that in the even that the servers *are* down, you're not really getting compensated for it. If the fee they charge is in the 6-15 dollar range and they pay 1.75x your fee back to you maximum, that won't even cover your subscription costs. I play on a rather stable, not terribly high population server. My fee from them would probably be around 5 bucks a month, and if I'm limited to getting 9 bucks back, why should I even bother? I have a good deal of consumer surplus from WoW (I'd be willing to pay more than the current monthly fees if the rates were hiked, as I enjoy a month of WoW quite a bit more than any other 15 bucks I spend monthly) so in the unlikely event that there is extended server downtime I'd get a whopping four bucks back, maximum. Since I'd already be willing to pay more to play WoW, they're utterly incapable of actually compensating me for the time I've lost.
TL:DR version of that: I'd like lots of compensation in extreme situations (multi-day realm down) but if they cap payments at minor inconvenience levels, why bother? It's like having car insurance that pays out a maximum of a thousand bucks. Sure, it may pay for a fender bender, but that's not why you have insurance in the first place.
With that being said, they bring up an interesting point in the 2nd part of the interview, which is funding their money through advertisements. If they can sustain this, they'll be able to nominally pay a benefit to WoW players, and still retain profit through advertising, which will actually enroll WoW players and thus provide a demographic for said advertising. However, to create that win/win situation, they need to be willing to take an initial loss by actually paying out a positive expectation, which is obviously risky to them if they don't have the actual revenue stream via ads yet.
Divinian Jan 16th 2009 9:33AM
two things that are horribly wrong with their answers..
1, "higher levels pay more?"
Why??? Higher levels have more outage or something? Bullcrap ..
2. "If that happens, we lose and the people who signed up actually make money"
Let me emphasize that last bit:
"ACTUALLY MAKE MONEY"
In other words, they don't expect anyone to make money, even though this is the sole reason why someone would sign up.
It's not a scam, in a scam they try to cover things up with a nice story and then take your money, these guys are just blatantly showing you how stupid their service really is and don't seem to be too affraid to let you know that you really won't be making any money.
Only an idiot would sign up for this stuff.
Amaxe Jan 16th 2009 9:33AM
I find their definition of "scam" interesting:
"scam is where we take the money, we don't pay out anything and that's it."
Well a pyramid scam pays out something to a few people.
However, even if it is well-intentioned and not dishonest, it really is only recouping a portion of your premiums and not at all worth it
Vader Jan 16th 2009 9:35AM
This is basically an insurance company. Car insurance, home insurance, pet insurance, even life and health insurance (which is an industry I work in) is all based on algorithms comparing potential income to potential outgoing.
Their formulae will have made them realise that at the levels they charge and the times they will need to pay they will make a profit. But some people who are unlucky and end up unable to play WoW may actually get back a lot more money in this way, its like all insurance that is not compulsory (like car insurance) its gamble and the buyer makes the decision themselves if its worth it or not.
Personally I see no real reason why you would need insurance for Wow being down, if its down I'll just remain in RL and do something else instead...
Quickshiv Jan 16th 2009 9:36AM
I have a system just like theirs but it pays out 100% of the time. I never loose money. It's called a savings account.
Irshalthra Jan 16th 2009 9:36AM
Here is my take. This site is set up as an insurance - an insurance that you can play or will get paid. I consider insurance a good thing, when used to curb VERY high expenses. Insurance is not needed for a $12.99 / month expense. We have insurance for medical, auto and home issues which can run into seven digit numbers - things that we could not afford to handle IF they happen.
Players want to "play", they do not want to pay more in hopes that they cannot play. IF this would somehow force Blizzard to have less down time, then there is a purpose, but this will not fix it.
Of course this leads to the question of "Are the Blizzard servers down too much?". This can be debated, but I don't see it at all.
This business is a reach and has FAIL written all over it. If players are not getting paid out more then they pay in they will bail, if players are getting paid more then they pay in then this business has to bail.
Don't get me wrong, they can do what they want and so can players, but IMO, as a controller of a large manufacturing company, I would not think about investing in this business or paying for this service.
With that said, the Federal Express business model was once said couldn't work either :P.
Blake Jan 16th 2009 1:46PM
Finally someone gets it. The issue here is you're insuring a $12.99/month investment. Not a $300,000 home, a $500,000 hospital bill, or a $50,000 car (or what have you). Just doesn't make sense to me. But to everyone who thinks this is a Pyramid or Ponzi scheme, go back and learn what those mean before throwing the terms around without warrant.