WoW Insider interview: You Play or We Pay founders

When we posted about the site earlier this week, a lot of readers cried foul. The site's business plan (players pay a fee every month, and then are compensated back money (sometimes more, sometimes less than they originally paid) when their realm is full or suffers downtime. Lots of our commenters called the site a scam (a few of them even suggested, incorrectly, that it was a phishing site), and they all wanted to know more: how could these guys get away with asking for a fee and taking people's money on the promise that they might get some back?
And so, when Tung and Golubovic contacted us at WoW Insider, we were anxious to put those questions to them directly. Were they able to justify the service they're providing (and maybe show Blizzard just how compensation should be done), or are they just trying to take advantage of people already losing gameplay to downtime? You can be the judge -- our exclusive interview is right after the break.
WoW Insider: So the main question we have is how this all works. You say on the site -- obviously, you play or we pay, so there's compensation, but how does it work? If I sign up on the site as someone interested in using your service, what happens?
George Tung: Basically, when a user signs up, they get to add as many characters as they want from whatever realm that they're on -- it doesn't have to be on one specific realm. We limit up to 10 characters per account. Once they add the characters in there, they see right away how much their monthly fee is going to be. We don't hide that -- it comes up on their account page under their character screen.
So you pay a monthly fee, and then what happens? Nothing until downtime?
Tung: Actually it starts right away. How we compensate players is not only downtime, but we datalog all of their information in terms of their realm, and we've been doing that for about six to seven months now, and what we do is, we look at when it's either down or in "high" population mode, meaning even though the server is not down, due to an outage or if it's just maxed out and there's waiting queues, even if the server is high population, it's getting close to max, we compensate during those times as well. Except it's much lower rate than if the realm went down completely.
So you pay out, and how do you pay? It's not cash?
Tung: We have a credit system, so that we compensate for credit, and we have it so that once you reach a certain limit, we can either send a check out, or we can credit toward's next month's compensation, or the last thing that we're working on is just refunding back to the credit card that they used to pay.
Ok. Obviously, as I posted on the site, you don't have any prices, and you said price is basically determined by server. So how much does the service cost? For example, if I entered a character, one of my characters is on Cenarius, which is a pretty high population server. How much would it cost me, first of all, and then what kind of compensation would I get out of that?
Milos Golubovic: We have tools on the site when you sign up. We have basically a compensation estimator, as well as a realm status history tool. I can't give you an exact quote right now, based on calculations, as I can't really do that in my head right now...
I mean in terms of an average character, how much will people pay per month?
Golubovic: I want to say it's close to five or six dollars. It can get as high as, I believe the highest amount is 11.
Tung: But the lowest is much lower than that. Basically level 80s will obviously pay more than a level 10. And obviously if you're on Cenarius, which is a pretty populated realm, it will be more than a new realm that Blizzard just came out with. But one way to check right away is if you add a character into your account, it actually shows you right away, based on your character level and that realm, what it would cost for that month. So it actually automatically generates it for you, so there's no guessing involved. That's already built onto the site.
So the flip side of that is, then -- does my money give me anything other than you paying me back? What's the average payout, then, for a character on a high population realm?
Tung: It's hard to say, because we basically came up with a formula based on what we have datalogged for the last seven months, and we have an average pertaining to lower months, heavier months like December and January and also through the holidays. So we do have a formula calculated so that's basically what we use for our fees. But of course, with patches and with unexpected outages, if that goes up any higher during any month or any given time, you're compensated for that, and that's how players can actually make money by signing up. For example, if a player signed up in November, which was basically a slower month, they would have made up to -- we have a cap at 1.75x what they paid, and actually in December, they would have made that 1.75, because looking at our data for December, basically all of the realms were heavily packed, most of them being maxed for several hours in a day.
So you say your average is about six dollars, and the most you can make off of downtime is about 1.75 that, so on average if I'm paying $6, the most I can get is $10.50.
Golubovic: Right, that's where our principle of -- we kind of want to motivate people to have, we don't want to stop people from playing World of Warcraft, and this is why we allow them to register up to 10 characters, so they can earn 1.75 times that 10 characters. So if they had 10, they can all be 80s if they're really hardcore players, but it's not unheard of to have that many characters from what I understand. They would earn that 1.75 times 10, so it would be close to like three dollars on the six, so that's about thirty dollars.
If everybody got that amount back, obviously you would run out of money really quickly, and that's one reason I think everyone thinks it's a scam, is because basically you're asking people to pay you money, with a chance of you giving them money back. So what would you say to someone who calls that a scam?
Tung: Sure, that's where we want to say, it's not a scam at all. A scam is where we take the money, we don't pay out anything and that's it. Or we take the money and we don't compensate at all. That's not what we're about at all. Of course, we're a new site, people will feel like it's a risk, but looking at some of the comments people made like, "oh, they're going to steal our WoW characters" -- we're not going to do that at all. Actually, we encourage people not to put their password for their WoW account when they're creating our account. There's no possibility that that's one of our goals. And then second of all, when someone is paying us, we're based in Chicago, I mean our company is in Chicago, we're not out of the country. We have a legit business license here -- if anyone needed to contact us, they could, and if they're paying with a credit card, obviously credit cards have their protections that come with. It's not like we're running away. To answer us being a scam, definitely not.
Now, in terms of just taking a risk to see if people actually make money, yes that is a risk. We're taking a risk also, because our calculations were based off of what we have gathered for only six months. It could be very different six months this year, or next year or the years after. So we could end up losing a lot of money by doing this.
Well obviously you're betting that Blizzard won't have another month like December where all the servers were high population and everyone had so much downtime.
Tung: Of course. If Blizzard's servers were at capacity or they were down an extreme amount of days in any given month, we're not anticipating that. If that happens, we lose and the people who signed up actually make money.
Click here for part two, where we talk about whether these guys would use their own site and what Blizzard might think of what they're doing.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Virtual selves, Making money, Interviews
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 4 of 7)
Murdock Jan 16th 2009 10:59AM
I think its interesting that you mention that no "legitimate" insurance company would take on more than it could pay out. Have you been watching the news over the last 4 months? Do you understand the Credit Default Swap market? This is EXACTLY that several large Banks and Insurance companies did. They took on more risk than they could ever pay out and now we are all feeling the effects.
So I don't believe their aren't "legitimate" companies that did exactly that.
As for those of you equating this a Madoff scheme, its not the same. In a classic Ponzi scheme you take money from the initial investors. You then promise them some amazing return. You recruit a new set of investors with the same promises and use their money to pay out the first set of people. Repeat this process over and over. The guys in first get some money and it all looks legit, the last guy in gets screwed and the planner walks out with a large part of everyone's money.
In the case of You Play or We Pay they have it structured just like insurance. Its up to the individual to decide for themselves if they feel its worth it. Personally I don't think it is, after all I can manage my life if I can't play WoW for a few days one month. Home insurance is worth it for me because it would be difficult to manage if I didn't have my home for a few days and had no other options.
Xcentro Jan 16th 2009 10:06AM
Still sounds like a scam to me....
Barnister Jan 16th 2009 10:07AM
What an obvious scam...
Slippy Jan 16th 2009 10:17AM
The thought process for someone using this service is the definition of handicapped. Isn't it illegal to take advantage of special people?
Thought process:
I pay $13 a month for this service, but I have to wait in a queue SOMETIMES, and SOMETIMES I the servers are down longer then they said they would be. I'm so pissed off, Blizzerd sucks!
Wow look at this site, I can now pay an additional $6 a month ($19 a month total) so that I can recoup $1 on my original $13 I paid to Blizzard.
TAKE THAT BLIZZARD!!!
WHAT?!??! Who does this make sense to and why is the price so high. I pay $80 a month to insure two $30,000 vehicles. That's less then 1%. These people are asking you to pay almost 50% of the cost each month?!?! Are they insane?? And is that per character?
Does this "service" include times were there is heavy lag?
/faith in humanity approaching point of no return
Harlequinne Jan 16th 2009 10:19AM
Oh noes, someone is trying to make money off the subscription-based MMO I'm paying Blizzard to play!
For the love of God...
a) If you call this a scam, then your health insurance is a scam too. You pay to cover for any damage, costs that you get in the case of accidents, or in this case server outages. If you break a limb, the insurance company will pay (a part) of the medical bills. In this case, if the server "dies", youplayweplay.com compensates for your subscription (since that has gone to waste if the server dies).
Of course, if nothing happens for the rest of your life, virtual or not, you will never see the money back. If something does happen though, you won't have to suffer the full brunt of the costs. Either way, the insurance company makes money.
b) If you've ever tried to get an insurance in the 18-30 aged male bracket, you will have noticed that you pay a premium, since males of 18 to 30 years of age have a higher chance of getting involved in accidents. They've got a higher chance to get compensated, but they pay a higher rate than other people.
Working backwards from that argument, higher level characters have more to lose in a server. Missed dailies, raids, etc. The "damage" caused by a server outage is higher than for, let's say, a level 30 character. That damage is, or at least should be, compensated, but, conversely, you pay more. You've got more to lose during server downtime, you'll get more, but you'll pay more.
With MMOs turning into SRS BIZNSS the last decade, someone was bound to come up with this (Wish it was me though!). With Blizzard's servers being "quite" stable right now, and their own form of compensation though, I don't see any reason why I should sign up for it. Of course, being in Europe helps.
Would've been fun if they had chosen AoC, or Tabula Rasa, though...
Slippy Jan 16th 2009 10:27AM
Wow, I can't believe you don't get it.
health insurance and car insurance all insure things of great value. Why would you insure $13 a month by paying $5 a month.
You explain that to me and you can have your cookie.
wrinklestein Jan 16th 2009 10:26AM
This is insurance, more or less. And unless these guys are licensed to sell insurance in their operating state, they could potentially be breaking the law. IANAL however.
I-man Jan 16th 2009 10:38AM
besides everything that's been said. why would you bother to get insurance for your $15 a month game? (stressing GAME)
The tiny chance that you might earn a few bucks isn't worth the hassle...
This makes me laugh.
Wrayth Jan 16th 2009 10:42AM
The inability for people to understand this concept, combined with the vitriol of their response, astounds me. Lets run it through a little.
1) The player pays Blizzard for what amounts to a full month of 24 hours a day playtime. Any time that the player is not playing is a loss in potentia... if you're not playing, you're possibly losing money, since you've already paid for the ability to play during that time.
2) The player has therefore paid money for something he considers to be of equal value, ie the ability to gain entertainment whenever he wishes.
3) Sometimes the player cannot play due to circumstances out of his control, EG high queues or server outage.
4) This company has offered to 'insure' against those points of return-on-revenue loss, with a premium of $6.
5) From the player's persective it's a gamble... will his character be unavailable for six dollar's worth of time that he would want to be playing, and would he therefore 'not pay' for the downtime.
6) It's a gamble for the company as well. Will enough people pay the $6 so that any particular server won't be down for more than the not-down money making time.
It is exactly the same as insurance... you are insuring against the revenue-loss of your asset (playtime) not being available when needed. As such, it's not a scam, it's merely the founders banking on a) Blizzard's server uptime track record and b) the level of annoyance of a player feeling 'scammed' at not being able to play.
Personally I see the biggest potential of this offering being a wakeup call to Blizzard to offer a pay-for-play payment model, the way some asian-market MMO's do.
Slippy Jan 16th 2009 10:51AM
Why? If you can't afford $15 a month then how do you a afford the monthly charge for the internet or the electricity powering everything.
It's dumb. If you can't afford the monthly fee then quit playing all together.
Paying EXTRA money on top of money you already deem "too much" is the wrong way to solve your problems.
As well insuring your time that you are using to play a game that is a "time waster" isn't a good argument either. That assumes you look at the GAME as a job an in that case you are mentally handicapped.
Moses Jan 16th 2009 10:51AM
I visit WoWInsider on a daily basis but if "promoting" this service and services like it on their site continue, I honestly think I'll stop visiting.
It's very insulting and I know a lot of players will fall for this service, not because they aren't necessarily "intelligent" enough to decide if it's a good deal or just scam but how deceptive they seem. I agree with most others that this is just some greedy money-making scheme and the sooner we forget about it, the better.
expat28 Jan 16th 2009 11:00AM
As a financial risk manager, I can tell you that all they are doing is a hedging strategy -- probably WAY too advanced for the average WoW player to understand but a perfectly normal, legal, sane business concept. It's done every day in hundreds of different industries.
Comments on this site remind me of an experience I had in Russia a few years ago. I had set up a business there that was doing very well and I wanted to extend some benefits to my employees as a way of sharing that profit. My idea was to establish a 401(k)-type fund where I would match their contribution. When I happily announced this new benefit, it went over like a lead balloon. Most people could not grasp the concept that we take for granted every day here in the USA. They just thought it was some way for me to not pay them their full salary, steal from them, and give them nothing but a promise.
Sound familiar?
Magma Jan 16th 2009 11:03AM
People are scared of what's not unfamiliar and instead of possibly trying to research the issue they just bash WI and say scam like childeren when they have no evidence to point to anywhere.
Slippy Jan 16th 2009 11:09AM
Scam? It's not a scam at all. It is just a downright dumb service.
They will probably make a bunch of money off dumb people.
/It's no wonder you people elected bush twice.
Derang Jan 16th 2009 11:13AM
Expat I agree, although I think you're being a bit hard on the average WoW player.
One thing that bugs me about this is that the WoW Terms of Use clearly states several times that in accepting the terms, you're accepting that the realms can be up or down, busy or quiet; all at Blizzard's whim.
In that sense, it differs from aforementioned health insurance policies.
I've not managed to find it yet but I've little doubt that Blizzard will also frown upon commercial gain arising directly from data mining their servers.
Lastly, I have questions as to how the site's designers will validate any claims without violation of both theirs and their clients' EULA.
Baalrog Jan 16th 2009 11:27AM
I thought I'd dig a bit to see where they were as the Chicago comment got me thinking.
1. Chicago Better Business Bureau has no record of them (checked site name and Milorge LLC)...maybe they should.
2. They registered the site using godaddy.com on 31-Oct-08.
3. The technical and administrative contacts are being obfuscated with a service out of Scottsdale, Arizona (domainsbyproxy.com).
4. Whois search: http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=youplayorwepay.com&prog_id=godaddy
5. This article (http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200914/1231951162.html) lists their address as 1202N 75th Street #190, Downers Grove, Il 60516
6. Toss the address from point 5 into maps.google.com (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=1202N+75th+Street+%23190,+Downers+Grove,+Il+60516&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=50.910968,79.101563&ie=UTF8&ll=41.74775,-88.004951&spn=0.047259,0.077248&z=14&iwloc=addr&layer=c&cbll=41.751204,-88.012863&panoid=fFKHmcNg-CabvPZXVAA5GA&cbp=12,290.61880540700326,,0,5) and I see 2 gas stations, what looks like a mall and a business down the road...
Why does this thing smell worse the more I look into it?
Hoggersbud Jan 16th 2009 1:36PM
Well, I don't think you're looking as carefully as you can. Their address is indicated as approximate on Google...which to me means it could be off by several miles, as I've had that experience before.
So I decided to look up just 1202N 75th St. Downers Grove and I managed to see quite a few businesses and storefronts with various suite numbers. So I'm going to say that they're located in some sort of office park, and as such, that's not really meaningful. Lots of people rent out offices like that.
Not saying that the service is legit or not, I'm just saying you can't really tell from the address.
Magma Jan 16th 2009 10:59AM
All you people that claim scam and gave shit answers that are not even fully explained, sicken me. At least know what the hell you're babbling about before you go off and say what's already been said 5000 times. As for me, I'll laugh when this turns out to be a legitimate business and then proceed to call everyone who said otherwise an idiot because they couldn't wrap their heads around a simple concept.
expat28 Jan 16th 2009 11:12AM
Since most people seem to understand Wikipedia, I cite this reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedge_(finance)
"In finance, a hedge is a position established in one market in an attempt to offset exposure to the price risk of an equal but opposite obligation or position in another market "
The people screaming "scam" and "worthless" are likely the same people screaming "refund" when the server goes down for half a day. Go back and look at those patch day comments. Why would you pay some service $6 dollars to get back $8 if the server goes down? I guess I would also ask why would you scream "refund" for a half day of lost play time when it amounts to 25 to 50 cents in lost fees?
I give high marks to these guys for coming up with an innovative solution to those cries for refunds, however, I give equally low marks for their overestimation of the financial acumen of the average WoW player.
Slippy Jan 16th 2009 11:23AM
"The people screaming "scam" and "worthless" are likely the same people screaming "refund" when the server goes down for half a day. Go back and look at those patch day comments. Why would you pay some service $6 dollars to get back $8 if the server goes down? I guess I would also ask why would you scream "refund" for a half day of lost play time when it amounts to 25 to 50 cents in lost fees?"
The people that scream "refund" are the people that are probably going to give this service more credit then it deserves.
The people that are posting "scam" and "worthless" understand that this is a ridiculous service; and understand that in the real world servers go down, or get full or need maintenance.
You can try an legitimize this as much as you want but trying to recoup $2 a month is insanity.
I guess you are taking it from the perspective of the business owner; in their case this is a business gamble that will probably pay out for them.
I'm only pointing out that for someone to actually sign up to this service they have issues that need to be addressed by a doctor.