Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-31-2009 @ 4:15PM
Nosscire said...
I can't really say that I like the idea of replenishment beeing mandatory. In a 25man, sure, but in a 10man it's not at all far fetched that you don't have replenishment, especially considering that 2 of the classes that can give replenishment also can heal, somehting that there's overall much more need for.
There's 5 dps spots in a 10 man, and these can be filled by 22 different speccs. Only 3 of those can give replenishment.
Fortunally replenishment isn't needed in Naxx (although it do help ALLOT) but if thats the philosphy they are taking for upcomming content...
Reply
1-31-2009 @ 4:49PM
Gessilea said...
I actually did take CG's comment to apply primarily to 25 man content. I suppose there's a fair bit of debate as to what constitutes "reasonably challenging content." I agree, for a 10 man that seems overly limiting, were as for a 25 man it's really not that big of a deal. I guess we'll have to wait and see!
1-31-2009 @ 4:49PM
Firestride said...
I don't think it's mentioned here, but whenever I've heard about this elsewhere, they meant 25-man. Same as how you don't need to bring priests to 10-man Razuvious.
1-31-2009 @ 4:54PM
Nosscire said...
I took "resonable challanging content" to mean new content that you do not already have of farm. I mean, for non professional guilds, Malygos have to be considered challanging content, even in 10 man.