Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-06-2009 @ 2:19AM
Cyanea said...
"I may not play a lock but 1 thing I would love to see for you guys (if it hasnt happened yet) is let soulshards stack, even it only is a stack of 10."
If Blizz isn't willing to give us a reason to not need a bag, they should at LEAST give us this. Even stackable in five is a nice improvement.
"Also does your shard bag give any bonuses or is it just shard storage opposed to the better quiver being a better speed boost?"
Nope.
"Can you store shards in non soul bags?"
Yes. A lot of Warlocks only carry around three or four when questing, and keep their bags in the bank until raiding or instancing. I'm Affliction, and will use maybe...one or two shards a play session.
"I am not trying to sound snippy or sarcastic, I just dont know what Locks have to work with."
You don't sound snippy. :D
I don't understand WHY we need Soul Shards anymore. It's not like they're hard to pick up at all. They seem to be just an outdated system.
Maybe if they want to keep this kind of limitation on us, they give us "Soul Gems" or something, which is a oneslot item that "stores" the souls we drain on it with a max limit of stored souls. Higher Gems with a higher soul limit can be made by JCs, or whatever