Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-22-2009 @ 3:15PM
GreatWizard said...
All the Warcraft novels I read ranged from readable though pretty bad (Day of the Dragon and war of the ancients) to horrible (Lord of the Clans). All in all, while learning the background of wow is nice, there are far far better fantasy novels out there.
Reply
2-22-2009 @ 3:28PM
JBurg said...
Guess we have the opposite opinion of these books. I found "Lord of the Clans" and "Rise of the Horde" to be very entertaining, but things like "Day of the Dragon" to be so bad I could barely stand to finish them.
I've never had much interest in Arthas or the whole Frozen Throne/undead stuff. I'm still looking forward to this book to see what Christie Golden can do with all this material.
2-22-2009 @ 3:28PM
omnimon said...
/agree
Entertaining enough in a way, and great for fillnig in the lore gaps, but well written they ain't. Last Guardian wasn't too bad but Tides of Darkness made me want to gouge out my eyes wth a spoon it was that poorly written. Hopefully Arthas will be more like the former
2-22-2009 @ 4:21PM
majorfalcon said...
I found Lord of the Clans to be the best, and Day of the Dragon to be pretty terrible. It's weird how that happens.