Skip to Content
2-27-2009 @ 2:19PM
Your post is passioned, but seems a little biased, obviously since you play warriors so much.For sure warrior viability in arenas need to be improved, since they are the least represented class in certain brackets. Again, part of the problem is balancing PvE vs. PvP. They should look into giving warriors more counters if they are going to nerf their DPS.However, part of your complaints don't really make any sense and seem like just QQ......you are complaining about lvl 77 warriors getting ROFLstomped in Wintersgrasp? Really? OF COURSE THEY ARE. Any level 77 is going to get trounced by a bunch of 80s, not just warriors. If they aren't, then you can legitimately say the class is OP.
2-27-2009 @ 5:00PM
QQ is only QQ if there's no constructive feedback given. He offered what he felt was a viable work-around for the issues he complained about, so I think I would file this under "Frustrated Griping That Has Been Given a Lot of Thought," more than QQ.
2-27-2009 @ 7:36PM
rofl he said the axe is level 77 not himself he is talking about the one you get from the ampiatheatre whichc happens to be the best till 80 and past it of you cant grind rep or get into any raids which he then mentions because warriors dps is "supposedly" shit...im not mcuh of a fan of warriors but they really do neeed a buff to some of the talents or like someone else said a counter or two
2-27-2009 @ 8:20PM
Actually, what he said was... "It's going to be a kick in the nuts to those who try and run Wintergrasp at 77 with their blue quest axe from Zul'Drak and get stomped even harder."Run wintergrasp at 77. That's the warrior he's talking about. And to be honest, If you're not lvl 80 and in at least naxx 10 equivilent gear, you're probably gonna get curbstomped by some dedicated PvPer in a full set of PvP epics. That's the nature of the beast in WG.
2-28-2009 @ 9:41AM
It's obvious you don't play warriors, or if you do, you're fortunate enough to have a good guild. What he's talking about isn't getting waffle stomped in WG at 77. He's talking about what happened to warriors preLK. Warrriors have a guild dependency. It's like they were made to be an alt class. You couldn't run 5 mans pre LK. Fury couldn't because fury DPS was a suckfest and Prot couldn't because it was so single target based. And before you idiots jump on me about "who cares! Raids need single target. Blah blah blah." We aren't ALL in higher end guilds. There's a lot of players who play that can't devote their time to busy raid schedules. Therefore they have to endure painful 5 mans until they are so well geared they can pug into raids. Therefore, they can't be carried up to raids. I was fury pre LK and switched to prot so I could atleast get a group that couldn't find a tank otherwise. I know exactly what Rossi means. The severe gear dependency means everyone but high end raiders get the shaft. It's not QQ. Just a group of people who are under represented. tired of getting walked on.
3-05-2009 @ 8:07AM
well you can try beating an well played, lvl 77 arcane mage with a lvl 80 warrior. See how that turns out and let me know. I tell you...you will just feel bad at the end and relog your DK if you want to do some PvP.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.