Skip to Content
2-27-2009 @ 2:36PM
This is a great idea.Warriors scale better w/ gear than any other class, but that also means that unless we're rocking best-in-slot, we're somewhat behind. i think making TG baseline would go a long way to evening out the effectiveness of warriors that just dinged 80 to those that are geared up.I also think you may be over-estimating how much work this would really take. Blizzard is full of very talented, capable people. I have no doubt they could come up with an interesting new 51-pt fury talent, and the rest of the overhaul could be accomplished by playing with coefficients.Making TG baseline isn't as crazy as you think.
2-27-2009 @ 4:41PM
Hmm, idk, the developers at blizzard are people like you and me. They are gamers that have a kickass job. Sure they did some schoolin' to get there, but they aren't geniuses.It would be a lot of work to rebalance ALL the trees around a baseline TG. I think it could work. Seriously. But Rossi is correct in saying it won't happen. I know we are -promised- changes for 3.1. But as time continues to slip by it seems that warriors are the black sheep that Blizz doesn't want to address. Time will tell. At least as prot I'm second best at all my tanking duties.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.