Ready Check: Know your raiders

Ready Check is a weekly column focusing on successful raiding for the serious raider. Hardcore or casual, ZA or Sunwell Plateau, everyone can get in on the action and down some bosses. This week, we get psychological on your posterior.
We're all familiar with caricatures of raiders, from the aggressive aggro-hungry warlock to the placid, gentle priest. Generalising to quite this extent is perhaps a little unfair, but it's certainly true that many raiders share common personality traits; by looking at research into personality and learning types, we can understand our raid force better and perhaps even find out a thing or two about how to manage them.
Have you ever wondered what makes your raid group tick? Why people with seemingly conflicting behaviour and goals get on just fine when there are dragons to be slain? Psychology research explains it all.

First of all, a disclaimer: I'm not a psychologist, I'm a researcher in computer science, and as such I am honour-bound to say that psychology is an inexact science -- hence I'm going to talk about a few different approaches in this column.
Bartle's Typing
Let's start by taking our cues from gaming research, and one of the seminal attempts at player classification, Richard Bartle's. Blogger and raider Sebastian combines this eight-way typing with Kolb's learning styles, but we'll revisit learning a bit later. Sebastian expounds that there are three types of hardcore raider, all with corresponding Bartle types:
- The Silent but Deadly player may not be outspoken, but their dedication and skill make them a cornerstone of your guild.
- The Killer seeks achievement and glory; their motivation and desire to be the best keep the guild pushing for high world rankings.
- The Dramatic is social and group-oriented, keeping guild atmosphere flowing, but is also the most likely to get political and cause drama.

iNTj and temperaments
There are plenty of other personality classification systems beyond Bartle. One well-known approach is the Myers-Briggs test, a personality questionnaire that divides takers into sixteen categories -- it'd be interesting to give this questionnaire to the top ten or fifty guilds and see the results. There are a couple of Myers-Briggs types that immediately stand out as 'raider' personalities: the iNTj, introverted thinker, fits right into the Silent but Deadly category, whereas the eSFp, extroverted socialiser, might slot right in as a Dramatic. Given the tendency of online gamers to classify as introverted and thinkers, though, you might well find most hardcore Dramatics actually classify as iNFp.
Classifying people as one of four basic temperaments dates back to Aristotle and Plato, and is more recently the basis of the Keirsey personality classification system. Under these dimensions, you are either an Artisan, Guardian, Idealist or Rational. Helen Fisher takes this further, identifying which chemicals in the brain are responsible for each personality type. Again, this seems to fit really neatly into WoW raiders: you have your dopamine-fuelled Artisans, optimistic, risk-taking and playful; serotonin-powered Guardians, reliable and calm; oestrogen-based Idealists, nurturing and idealistic; and testosterone-fuelled Rationals, focused workaholics.
It's clear that there's a straight mapping between Guardians and the Silent but Deadly player, the reliable, solid members everyone can lean on. Killers may be both Artisans and Rationals, with the Artisan types inspired to achieve through creativity and the Rationals motivated by ambition. Dramatics are likely to be the linguistic Idealists, but you'll also find Rationals in this bucket. Chances are your guild's leadership is primarily Rationals, with one or two Idealists or Artisans to temper their ambition and help counterbalance burnout. (A quick way to tell if you had high exposure to testosterone in the womb is to compare the lengths of your index and ring fingers. If the ring finger is longer, your testosterone levels were higher. Try asking your guild officers to do this test!)

Learning
Personality isn't everything, though. WoW is a constant learning experience, and looking at how different people learn is key to managing progress raids and new trials alike. Altitis and Sebastian both look at different learning styles:
- Activists learn by doing, jumping in head first.
- Theorists like to have clear mental images and models.
- Reflectors learn by internalising and analysing their own experiences.
- Pragmatists focus on information that has a direct use.

How can this information help you raid?
By knowing how your players roll, you can deal with them better. Understanding that people learn differently, and figuring out exactly why your main tank spends so much time on EJ when she hardly says a word during raids, means you're less likely to get frustrated and/or come to blows with her over her obsessive need for detail. Having a raid leader who wants to pull just to see what happens when your raid is primarily composed of people who think that on-the-fly planning is a waste of time means you're setting yourself up for a struggle; understanding your player base and how they learn and interoperate is key.
The main takeway from all the above for me is to remember that not everyone plays, or learns, the same way I do. There's a place for everyone, and by understanding exactly what drives those I raid with, I have a better chance of getting on with them when our personalities and styles naturally clash. The styles above are exactly why certain people are impatient to pull and angry when they die, why some respond better to pages of discussions on our forums where others will make do with a ten minute chat on ventrilo. The big question, of course, is which categorisation do you fall into? Me, I'm a Dramatic, primarily Rational with a sprinkling of Artisan, and I learn as a Reflector.
For those interested in applying this to non-hardcore guilds, Sebastian's just published a followup looking at guilds more generally.
Filed under: Tips, Virtual selves, Guilds, Raiding, Ready Check (Raiding)






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Ono Feb 28th 2009 6:16PM
Fantastic and very informative article, a very enjoyable read and will be very interesting to apply such thoughts into practice and see what personality traits lie within my Guild.
Aedilhild Feb 28th 2009 6:21PM
This is persnickety of me, but the INTJ is, under Myers-Briggs, an introverted intuitor. Its cognitive functions are introverted intution (Ni), extroverted thinking (Te), introverted ethics/feeling (Fi), and extroverted sensing (Se).
It's the INTP that's the introverted thinker: introverted thinking (Ti), extroverted intuition (Ne), introverted sensing (Si), and extroverted ethics/feeling (Fe).
What appears to be a single-letter discrepancy in theory can be, in reality, quite a difference in personality — very different motivations make stereotypical INTJs and INTPs tick, and that's before one considers individual deviations from type theory.
Still, what you've presented will be very helpful to players who have an interest in interpersonal and group dynamics, have noticed patterns among their teammates or guildmates, but heretofore lacked any system to clarify it all.
The following is a reasonably accurate test for Myers-Briggs:
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp
Azizrael Feb 28th 2009 7:39PM
The problem I have with these kind of tests is that there's no way to differentiate between "meh, I guess" and "OMG that's so me", so the description I get at the end always reads like a very extreme example that doesn't really reflect how I see myself, or how others see me.
Take, for example, "You have good control over your desire and temptations" - surely the answer for everyone is "some yes, others no"? That doesn't tell you anything about me as a person, other than I'm a human being.
Daniel Feb 28th 2009 8:55PM
First, good reply. I am a psychologist and I use Jungian psychology all the time. Your correction is spot on.
@azizreal. Anyone who uses just the test should be shot in the head. I am an INTJ but I test as ENTJ because of American cultural bias (ESTJ male society, for the most part). I despise MBTI people who perform the test without doing a proper and full evaluation (and yes, I am looking at you CAPT). On-line tests in particular are suspect for non-Americans. The MBTI is a powerful tool when used within its proper context by a skilled practitioner. If those two conditions are not met, the test results are nothing but a bunch of gobbledygook and psychobabble.
OP. I have never thought of using MBTI for raiding mostly because I don't raid (he he). The results might be interesting but I am skeptical because type falsification would be so easy. I certainly wouldn't attempt to predict type from in-game actions.
Garlictators Feb 28th 2009 6:50PM
As an infp, I can see how we're behind a lot of drama. We're more likely to take things personally and when drama happens, we can be offended by anyone that doesn't take our side. But I think a way to look at it in a positive way, at least for me, is that I have a desire to be of service to people. So naturally I enjoy healing a lot. I actually find dps is very boring because the only thing i have to care about is purples and meters. I much more motivated by a compliment or sign of appreciation in the group, especially from the tank.
justlikehoneybaby Feb 28th 2009 6:52PM
I am sure those in more progressed guilds would like to agree with your assertion that they have less drama, but that hasn't been my personal experience. Having been in progressed 40-man and 25-man guilds, as well a casual guilds across my various characters, I have seen more than enough drama from loot-obsessed "Killers" in my progressed guilds.
Sebastian Feb 28th 2009 7:33PM
You will find little or no loot drama in an ACTUAL hardcore guild. If you are talking about a guild that THINKS it's hardcore, then yes... they will all bicker about loot.
In a hardcore guild no one really cares for loot, other than to get the job done better, or to get to #1 faster!
justlikehoneybaby Feb 28th 2009 11:58PM
now now Sebastian that sounds ilke ePeen! The who's more hardcore than thou...
:)
I think it was an overstatement that can't be backed up by statistics. WoW lacks a dramameter, alas. Unless you count the realm forums...
Sebastian Mar 1st 2009 7:38AM
Well, I more mean that hardcore guilds just don't really have the time to argue about loot distribution. Sure, a fair system is required to prevent discontent -- but once you have a decent DKP system, I think it would be very unlikely to find proper 'loot drama' in one of the top guilds in the world.
Perhaps amongst newer players that are seeking to gear-up, or aren't yet part of the 'core' that might be the case.
I'm not talking about epeen! That only comes from being server first, or world first :)
Frago Feb 28th 2009 7:11PM
INTj here.
I can only play healers and find any other role to be mundane. I would probably be a tank if not a healer , but as it stands I caanot enjoy WoW as anything but a Healer.
Also have a pretty low level view of DPS players. I consider them to be lazy , me first types who relish in Recount numbers and linking loot they drool over from Atlas loot addon.
I respect tanks but feel as though they are just as they seem, A meathead.
Well that about covers it .
Thanks /blah /blah /blah
nist7 Feb 28th 2009 7:21PM
"Also have a pretty low level view of DPS players. I consider them to be lazy , me first types who relish in Recount numbers and linking loot they drool over from Atlas loot addon.
I respect tanks but feel as though they are just as they seem, A meathead."
Is this guy serious?
I haven't heard of such self-righteous comments in a long, long time. Good luck healing those "meatheads" and "lazy DPS."
LOL
Garlictators Feb 28th 2009 7:28PM
sometimes i feel myself slipping into this pretentious views of others too. But the thing is, without the tank or dps, I have no purpose. I actually respect people's differing motivations because it takes all types to make the world go 'round. If there wasn't anyone chasing epic loot, we'd all sit in /trade all day being bombarded by idiotic anal jokes!
darthginger Mar 1st 2009 10:32AM
I used to maintank during tbc but for wotlk i stepped back and now im just starting heroics tbh cos i put my study first and onl play weekends.. but id say tanks or at the least the ones i played alongside are less meatheadish than you'd think.
a few have a god complex.. some are really quiet and never say a word but do there job. others like me and my former MT share player. (we had 3 MTs tbh, one avoidance, one stam, and me the kinda halfway inbetween. ) used to just makes jokes at each others expense and joke around.
(betting on who'd die first, accidently dropping threat to wipe out melee dps on gruul, lootreaver... you know :P )
but far from meatheadish.. we were all fairly relaxed, and just enjoyed playing side by side in a role that 75% of the players didnt understand or didnt want to.
Garlictators Feb 28th 2009 7:30PM
and If your tank is doing his/her job right, i don't care how much of a "meathead" they are, give them a cookie. It's the least you can do.
Jabadabadana Feb 28th 2009 8:26PM
So apparently I'm an INTP, but regardless, I find that I enjoy all roles, at different times. I like to tank when I'm feeling like I need to have some responsibility and feel like getting the kick out of helping others enjoy the game, I heal, because it's fun, takes some effort, and I'm relatively good at it, but honestly, when I feel like being lazy, and am tired of feeling like part of the two poles holding up the group, it's kind of nice to sit back on some dps character and just kill stuff.
Rollo Feb 28th 2009 9:50PM
Very interesting read. I took a personality test once as part of a course in handling conflicts. I was blown away by how exact the description of myself I got was. I've been fascinated by these personality theories ever since. :)
Ilnara Feb 28th 2009 9:56PM
I sheepishly admit, I'm a Dramatic. For me it's about the group of people I hang out with more than anything else.
I've taken the Keirsey test, I'm an Idealist in that regard.
As for how I learn, I used to be a pretty straight forward Activist, mainly because I tend to do better 'cold' and so that was always conducive to 'jumping in'.
When I was focusing on bettering my Goaltending a few years back I learned to apply all 4 methods of learning, in order, Pragmatism, Theory, Activist, then Reflection. So today, that is how I deal with picking up and applying information.
Frago Feb 28th 2009 10:02PM
Sorry if I hurt anyones feelings.
Just being honest in my opinions of players. I fully realize that all three archtypes are equally important. I merely merely stated my view of them from the "vibe" they give off.
Stephanie Mar 1st 2009 12:04AM
I had to take the Meyer-Briggs as part of a training course I took for work, and I am an INFJ, which apparently is the rarest of all the MB personality types. (Made me feel like a freak!)
All I can say about my gaming experience is that I tend to gravitate towards ranged DPS. In Galaxies I was a rifleman; in EQ2 I was a ranger; and here in WoW my most-played characters are a warlock and a hunter. For some reason I just have never taken to being a healer, tank, or even melee dps really. I don't think that makes me lazy, as one commenter said he/she views dpsers; that's just the play style I prefer.
(FWIW, the only time I've played a non-ranged DPS class and loved it was my Champion in LOTRO. LOVED that class. Miss the game a lot (had to pick a game to unsub due to financial strain and I picked LOTRO. Hope to be able to pick it back up again someday.))
Anewkeitaro Mar 1st 2009 4:24AM
Sebastians classification was a load of crap. It feels completely archaic in nature. It would fit perfectly in with the time period where chastity belts were utilized.