Skip to Content
3-20-2009 @ 4:39PM
"1) Warlocks are amazing in PvP... as long as they can be kept alive."Translation: Warlocks are amazing when they have a healer babysitting them. Otherwise, they're awful. Warlocks are dependent on other members of their group, specifically, healers.2) A DK/Pally combo is so strong, that any other DPSer thrown into the mix will do fairly well -- but Warlocks complete the trio amazingly well due to DoT dmg and a spammable Fear.Translation: The Warlock is filler. Any class will do well with a DK/Pally combo. 3) Warlocks are fine... minimal changes are required at best (something I really believe to be true).Translation: Warlocks are dependent on healers and are filler at best, but are fine, really!Warlocks are in the same boat as warriors. They're really only any good when they have a healer attached to the butt, babysitting them, and even at best, as you said it, they're just filler. Sorry, I don't see how that translates to "Warlocks are just fine." It seems like they have a lot of other problems. What other classes other than warriors are completely dependent on their healers and are filler, at best?
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.