All the World's a Stage: So you want to be a Skinner
This installment of All the World's a Stage is the thirtieth in a series of roleplaying guides in which we find out all the background information you need to roleplay a particular race or class (or profession!) well, without embarrassing yourself.
I should say at the outset of this article that I am a vegetarian, and I generally think of animals as cute and fuzzy friends of the human race. I have no moral objection against hunting animals and using their bodies for food or clothing, however. Logically, it makes sense that people have needed this to survive, but emotionally speaking, I find skinning and eating animals rather distasteful. Things would have been different for me if I had been raised on a farm or in a hunting community instead of a city thoroughly saturated with the culture of Disney movies about cute animals singing songs and having adventures, but... anyways, you are what you are. Hunting enthusiasts should feel free to write their own articles on the topic if they have different points of view.
So, anyway, as my vegetarian brain started churning around this idea of how skinning can be roleplayed in World of Warcraft, I couldn't help but admit to myself that I don't have so much real life experience of the topic. In fact, my first google search of "Skinning" turned up none other than WoWwiki's page on skinning in WoW, and I realized most people living in cities probably haven't got the first clue of what skinning animals is really like.
So I searched again for "skinning animals," and this time I found various articles about how to skin an animal for people who are interested in surviving in the wilderness, or just into hunting in general. One site even had simple hand-drawn animations of the proper way to kill and skin a rabbit, and I was struck by how very different this was from my experience of skinning in WoW. In the animation, we see the head and feet get cut off, a slice go down the middle of the animal's body, and the skin slowly peeling away to reveal all the flesh underneath... while in WoW we just right-click on a dead animal, loot its hide, and poof -- it disappears before our eyes.
Getting real
Now, normally I say that what you see in WoW is what you get. If there are mineral ores sticking up out of the ground in grassy plain in the game, then Azeroth is a world in which mineral ores stick up out of the ground in grassy plains. As roleplayers we just adjust to that, we find reasons for it, and our characters play it out as if it's a totally normal thing.
Skinning, however, is an exception. Here, it seems clear that the omission of actual blood and gore from this profession is more of a nod to parents of children who may be playing the game than it is an actual declaration that blood and gore do not exist under the skins of Azerothian beasts. To a certain extent, this blood and gore is represented when you can click on animals and loot their various meats, but that's obviously a different feeling from real life skinning.
So the challenge for a roleplayer is to understand what skinning really is, then turn around and let your character act as if this blood and flesh is what he's seeing every time he skins an animal. If your character is someone like me, who thinks animals are cute and friendly, who would see a pig and think of Babe -- not dinner -- then skinning is not the profession for you. Your character has to be comfortable getting his or her hands bloody and taking bodies apart.
Skinning with class
Hunters are obvious choices for skinners, of course -- they just go together like peas and carrots! In a way, it's odd that some hunters might not be skinners. Why wouldn't a hunter skin any animals he kills? If you play a hunter who is not a skinner, it would be a good idea to think of a reason why. Maybe your non-skinning hunter is more of a sharpshooter, or an animal trainer, than an actual wilderness survivalist, or maybe he's just a vegetarian.
Other classes who generally hack their enemies to pieces wouldn't necessarily know how to skin animals, but they wouldn't be averse to it either. A warrior, rogue, or especially a death knight who has a problem with the sight of blood and flesh would be strange indeed (and interesting, if you could make it work)! Feral druids, enhancement shamans and retribution paladins would likely feel similarly. A character of these classes who is averse to the actual sight of blood is not beyond the scope of the imagination, but would require a bit of ingenuity.
"Softer" characters, who focus more on magical abilities, healing, and other sorts of activities without much blood and dissection may find skinning animals repulsive. Priests and mages in particular may be quite unused to the sight of it, though of course there could be any number of reasons why a priest or mage would have no problem with skinning. One just has to give it a bit of thought. Perhaps your priest is like a medical student who just can't get enough of dissection and anatomy. An more macabre skinner priest (especially an undead one) might even extend this interest beyond skinning animals, to include dissecting dead humans as well -- purely for the sake of knowledge, or so they say. A skinning mage (especially a troll) could go even farther, into complete madness, by writing his scrolls and spellbooks on the skins he takes from dead animals (and... people?) because he thinks it gives his spells extra potency.
Warlocks might relish the sight of animal blood and flesh being torn apart. After all, could a class who specializes in curses that rot away living flesh and explode all the blood vessels in one's eyeballs possibly have any problem with a bit of skin coming off animals? It would probably give them ideas for new sorts of curses they could cast.
Me hates dem aminals!
Another obvious possibility for a skinner of any class is that he is simply mad with animal-hatred. As Fargostar5000 pointed out in a comment on a previous article, your skinner could be "an anti-DEHTA crazed poacher," or even "some kind of squirell vanquisher." Does your character think that the Druids for the Ethical and Humane Treatment of Animals are a bunch of flower-brains? Does he kill animals, take one small part (such as a tusk, or toenail) and then leave the rest to rot, merely out of spite? If so, then skinning is the profession you could use to express that. Or perhaps your character has a crazy mad phobia of things that lurk inside the body of furry woodland creatures, and must take animal bodies apart in order to be sure that wicked demon creatures will not burst out of their corpses.
In short, skinning is yet another profession where your character can go nuts and be very creative, albeit this time in a rather unsavory fashion -- yet at the same time, skinning is a good choice for the simple, down-to-earth character who just wants to get by in the wilderness, and use all of nature's resources in a responsible manner.
All the World's a Stage continues this series on roleplaying within the lore with this week's look at being a skinner. Be sure to check out previous articles on roleplaying herbalism, mining, tailoring, and alchemy, and think about ways to add flesh to your character, if you feel all you've got so far is skin.
I should say at the outset of this article that I am a vegetarian, and I generally think of animals as cute and fuzzy friends of the human race. I have no moral objection against hunting animals and using their bodies for food or clothing, however. Logically, it makes sense that people have needed this to survive, but emotionally speaking, I find skinning and eating animals rather distasteful. Things would have been different for me if I had been raised on a farm or in a hunting community instead of a city thoroughly saturated with the culture of Disney movies about cute animals singing songs and having adventures, but... anyways, you are what you are. Hunting enthusiasts should feel free to write their own articles on the topic if they have different points of view.
So, anyway, as my vegetarian brain started churning around this idea of how skinning can be roleplayed in World of Warcraft, I couldn't help but admit to myself that I don't have so much real life experience of the topic. In fact, my first google search of "Skinning" turned up none other than WoWwiki's page on skinning in WoW, and I realized most people living in cities probably haven't got the first clue of what skinning animals is really like.
So I searched again for "skinning animals," and this time I found various articles about how to skin an animal for people who are interested in surviving in the wilderness, or just into hunting in general. One site even had simple hand-drawn animations of the proper way to kill and skin a rabbit, and I was struck by how very different this was from my experience of skinning in WoW. In the animation, we see the head and feet get cut off, a slice go down the middle of the animal's body, and the skin slowly peeling away to reveal all the flesh underneath... while in WoW we just right-click on a dead animal, loot its hide, and poof -- it disappears before our eyes.
Getting real
Now, normally I say that what you see in WoW is what you get. If there are mineral ores sticking up out of the ground in grassy plain in the game, then Azeroth is a world in which mineral ores stick up out of the ground in grassy plains. As roleplayers we just adjust to that, we find reasons for it, and our characters play it out as if it's a totally normal thing.
Skinning, however, is an exception. Here, it seems clear that the omission of actual blood and gore from this profession is more of a nod to parents of children who may be playing the game than it is an actual declaration that blood and gore do not exist under the skins of Azerothian beasts. To a certain extent, this blood and gore is represented when you can click on animals and loot their various meats, but that's obviously a different feeling from real life skinning.
So the challenge for a roleplayer is to understand what skinning really is, then turn around and let your character act as if this blood and flesh is what he's seeing every time he skins an animal. If your character is someone like me, who thinks animals are cute and friendly, who would see a pig and think of Babe -- not dinner -- then skinning is not the profession for you. Your character has to be comfortable getting his or her hands bloody and taking bodies apart.
Skinning with class
Hunters are obvious choices for skinners, of course -- they just go together like peas and carrots! In a way, it's odd that some hunters might not be skinners. Why wouldn't a hunter skin any animals he kills? If you play a hunter who is not a skinner, it would be a good idea to think of a reason why. Maybe your non-skinning hunter is more of a sharpshooter, or an animal trainer, than an actual wilderness survivalist, or maybe he's just a vegetarian.
Other classes who generally hack their enemies to pieces wouldn't necessarily know how to skin animals, but they wouldn't be averse to it either. A warrior, rogue, or especially a death knight who has a problem with the sight of blood and flesh would be strange indeed (and interesting, if you could make it work)! Feral druids, enhancement shamans and retribution paladins would likely feel similarly. A character of these classes who is averse to the actual sight of blood is not beyond the scope of the imagination, but would require a bit of ingenuity.
"Softer" characters, who focus more on magical abilities, healing, and other sorts of activities without much blood and dissection may find skinning animals repulsive. Priests and mages in particular may be quite unused to the sight of it, though of course there could be any number of reasons why a priest or mage would have no problem with skinning. One just has to give it a bit of thought. Perhaps your priest is like a medical student who just can't get enough of dissection and anatomy. An more macabre skinner priest (especially an undead one) might even extend this interest beyond skinning animals, to include dissecting dead humans as well -- purely for the sake of knowledge, or so they say. A skinning mage (especially a troll) could go even farther, into complete madness, by writing his scrolls and spellbooks on the skins he takes from dead animals (and... people?) because he thinks it gives his spells extra potency.
Warlocks might relish the sight of animal blood and flesh being torn apart. After all, could a class who specializes in curses that rot away living flesh and explode all the blood vessels in one's eyeballs possibly have any problem with a bit of skin coming off animals? It would probably give them ideas for new sorts of curses they could cast.
Me hates dem aminals!
Another obvious possibility for a skinner of any class is that he is simply mad with animal-hatred. As Fargostar5000 pointed out in a comment on a previous article, your skinner could be "an anti-DEHTA crazed poacher," or even "some kind of squirell vanquisher." Does your character think that the Druids for the Ethical and Humane Treatment of Animals are a bunch of flower-brains? Does he kill animals, take one small part (such as a tusk, or toenail) and then leave the rest to rot, merely out of spite? If so, then skinning is the profession you could use to express that. Or perhaps your character has a crazy mad phobia of things that lurk inside the body of furry woodland creatures, and must take animal bodies apart in order to be sure that wicked demon creatures will not burst out of their corpses.
In short, skinning is yet another profession where your character can go nuts and be very creative, albeit this time in a rather unsavory fashion -- yet at the same time, skinning is a good choice for the simple, down-to-earth character who just wants to get by in the wilderness, and use all of nature's resources in a responsible manner.
Filed under: All the World's a Stage (Roleplaying), Death Knight, Classes, RP, Guides, Lore, Skinning, Warrior, Warlock, Shaman, Rogue, Priest, Paladin, Mage, Hunter, Druid, Trolls, Undead







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Kakistocracy Mar 23rd 2009 12:06AM
I like the sound of Vegetarian Hunters...
I kid of course, most of the vegetarians I know are nice.
One possible justification for a healing class to skin would be an interest in vivisection to better understand the function of life. Though the sort of Cartesian thinking necessary to justify vivisection is well beyond my means. That's not to say I don't mind asserting my dominance over an animal by eating it, just that I would question any assessment of "conscience" based solely on the subjects ability to express its presence.
Ametrine Mar 23rd 2009 12:20AM
I think I follow you. To heal the body, they must first know how the body is arranged. Kinda like how it's pretty hard to repair a car engine if you don't know what bolts and wires attach to which plugs and sockets...
onetrueping Mar 23rd 2009 2:28AM
In a world where healing is largely done through magic, vivisection would be more the purview of Necromancers and others who need a more intimate understanding of how all the parts fit together. With the Light, you don't need to know what's broken, really, just have faith that it will be healed.
The purpose of vivisection (or, as it is referred to in Universities, the cadaver lab) is to understand exactly how everything fits together so it can be manually fixed, through surgery, therapy, and the like. The understanding of anatomy is primarily due to the direct nature of our form of healing. But there's no reason to believe that a faith-based healer of any kind needs to know the exact name of a muscle, or what two (or more) bones it connects, to entreat the Light for the power to heal it. But when reconstructing a body from parts via stitching, a deeper knowledge of both anatomy and butchery would be needed, to properly pull apart and put together the appropriate joints and muscles.
Now, any skinner who has cooking could easily describe the skinning as the first step in slowly preparing an animal to be cooked, potentially through sectioning.
Ondeo Mar 23rd 2009 3:09AM
my only question on all this is....why would a vegetarian hunt animals? They dont believe in eating them so why would the kill them you know?
onetrueping Mar 23rd 2009 3:15AM
Ondeo, the primary idea is, as I understand it, to use the Hunter class to represent the equivalent of guerrilla fighters, scouts, snipers, or musketeers. In other words, to use the mechanics given by the class in ways that don't fall into the actual "hunter" trope, but rather follow the general ideals of, say, the D&D Ranger class.
Thayer Mar 23rd 2009 6:44AM
Just want to jump in here. Vivisection is the act of taking a living being apart while they're still alive. Dissection is the same act while the being is dead. Big difference. :)
Kakistocracy Mar 23rd 2009 8:57AM
Exactly, Thayer, so if someone feels that vivisection can be performed on a cadaver, their subject may not have been as dead as they thought.
And Ondeo, Given that you are replying to me, I will assume that you are replying to what I said, so...
A vegetarian hunter would not hunt animals...
he or she would hunt vegetarians (the second most dangerous game?).
artifex Mar 23rd 2009 10:21AM
Ondeo: Not all vegetarians choose to be that way because of moral issues. Some are vegetarians just for health reasons.
Luisette Mar 23rd 2009 12:52PM
Skinners receive Master of Anatomy now, so there you go! :)
DeathPaladin Mar 23rd 2009 12:49AM
My Death Knight is a skinner/herbalist. Being from a non-RP server, this was mostly because I am not patient enough to grind through low-level areas gathering materials so I can grind a crafting profession. Being dual-gathering meant I only had to stay in the low-level areas long enough to get enough skill to move up to the next level.
However, I have a personality that rather enjoys RP, so I often try to find RP reasons for out-of-character choices.
In the case of my Death Knight, I figure he uses skinning and herbalism as a way of enabling him to reassimilate with human society. My DK is not the survival-outdoorsman type. He sets his hearth to Dalaran because the inns have comfortable beds and he'll be damned if he's forced to rest out in the harsh wilderness just because he's dead. However, it's hard for him to integrate back into civilization when he's having to fight the constant urge to start hacking apart everything in his path.
So, when he goes out adventuring, he rips small plants out of the ground and flays the flesh off of the creatures he kills. These acts allow him to sate his bloodlust enough so that he doesn't start mutilating people on the steps to the Dalaran bank. The fact that people are willing to pay him for the byproducts of his brutality is merely icing on the cake.
R. Sue Mar 23rd 2009 12:56AM
That is the most freaking awesome RP trope I think I've ever read. Well played, sir.
James Mar 23rd 2009 12:42PM
you sir have convinced me that RP may not be quite as "geeky" as i tend to believe it is. this was just a purely cool thing to read and has made me think of reasons for my DK's professions and even why i choose to hearth out in Icecrown instead of Dalaran.
alpha5099 Mar 23rd 2009 1:03AM
I have a similar attitude: I don't play on RP servers, but I like to try to keep some mild RP elements. I try to use names that feel appropriate to the character, and I like having justifications for stuff like professions. Skinning is probably my favorite profession, for a lot of reasons. I love the added crit rating, it makes good money with minimal effort, and I just think it's really easy to justify for most of my characters.
One of my favorite RP-esque ideas was playing a Draenei like they were a naturalist: going out into this alien world and collecting samples of the flora and fauna to study Azeroth, so that'd be the reason for them to be a skinner and herbalist (mining could also work for getting geological samples. My original idea was to do this with a hunter (this whole idea came from trying to justify a Draenei hunter, as they seemed the most unexpected class for the race), as that would further the studying animals part, but I just started a shaman that I'm absolutely loving, and he's rocking the skinning and herbalism and getting all in touch with this new planet.
Justin Mar 23rd 2009 1:19AM
I have skinned an animal before. It's pretty gruesome especially with larger animals like deer.
Plastic Rat Mar 23rd 2009 2:17AM
I don't see that hunters have to be the default "Kill small animals in a manly way" type hunters.
My character is revered with the Argent Dawn and Argent Crusade. He's more of an 'undead hunter'. Think Van Helsing, but with more facial hair and ale. He's got Engineering for more Undead Killing toys.
As far as hunting animals in the wilds of Azeroth.. he might do it for food if he really needed to, just as any other character might.
...and I'm also vegetarian IRL. I grew up in more of a hunting/fishing/farm community. I've seen a fair share of animals on the inside and the process that got them there, and I think it's my biggest reason for being vegetarian.
onetrueping Mar 23rd 2009 2:32AM
I hate to bring this to your attention, but it is in part said process of turning animal into food that led to the largely thorough base of veterinary knowledge we have today... and even human medical care. Farming does have an inherent need built into it to care for the various animals, and the skill of butchering has also granted a deep knowledge of how the creatures are put together, making it easier to treat broken legs and the like.
Plastic Rat Mar 23rd 2009 2:49AM
At no point in my comment did I condemn the gathering of veterinary or human medical knowledge through examining dead animals, or that I was unaware of it.
Neither did I say that farming does not have an inherent requirement of looking after animals (at least until they're mature enough to be sold as a viable product in little baggies).
Why is it that the moment you mention the fact that you're vegetarian, some folk have the burning desire to point out to you the value of the killing animals?
onetrueping Mar 23rd 2009 3:05AM
Hoi. I was actually referring, in farming, to the care of horses (for pulling wagons, plows, etc) and milk cows and oxen (for more pulling, and collection of milk). And while it is true that SOME killing of animals, particularly over-hunting, poaching, and the like, as well as treatment of animals, such as puppy mills (so many vegetarians with store-bought dogs. good lord), beef "factories" and the like, are extremely deplorable, there is a big difference, at least in my mind, between that and the careful and humane raising, caring, and eventual slaughter of farm animals in some situations.
That said, it wasn't out of some burning desire to point out "the value of killing animals" so much as to provide a counterpoint to the general overtone of both the original post and the following comments, which was most necessarily concentrated in your closing comment, which could easily be construed by less informed types as "a burning desire to point out that you are a vegetarian whenever something involving preperation/care/whatever of animals is mentioned." One's status as a vegetarian could have no particular relevance to the topic except to express disapproval of the treatment of animals, and such an opinion does, to an extent, require some rebuttal in the form of support for a traditional and once-necessary act. (Note "once-necessary." Today, the slaughter of animals is more to support a largely carnivorous-by-choice diet than out of a need for protein, skins, and tools made from bones, and could be curtailed a fair amount. The actual necessity and means of curtailment and personal choice is a matter for more lengthy debate, and one which I would rather not debate in such a forum.)
It was also a followup on my previous comment on vivisection and it's use in medicine, hence a large portion of the comment's content.
Plastic Rat Mar 23rd 2009 3:20AM
Well I think you hit all the points on the head there. Perhaps I'm a bit of an over-sensitive veggie who's sick of being ripped off about it or being mistaken for some starry eyed crystal-waver.
I get the feeling we'd likely likely agree on most things over a cup of coffee. So good post, and apologies if I came across as offensive. I'll leave this topic to hopefully go back on track.
onetrueping Mar 23rd 2009 3:22AM
Apology accepted. And the cup of coffee down the line, perhaps, such debates are always my favorite, heh. Now, to find more nails to hammer down somewhere...