Addon Spotlight: Alternatives to Outfitter
Every weekend (ish), Addon Spotlight takes a look at the little bits of Lua and XML that make our interfaces special. From bar mods to unit frames and beyond, if it goes in your Addons folder, we'll cover it here.
The addon world is currently abuzz with reactions to Blizzard's new addon policy (briefly: you can't charge for addons or solicit donations for them in-game). I'm not going to go there in this column, since it's been pretty well covered around the blogosphere and in any case I don't want to ignite a flame war.
However, I do want to talk about an issue related to the developments surrounding the new addon policy. The author of Outfitter (and GroupCalendar) has chosen to cease publishing those addons (in protest, asapparently). I rely on Outfitter on all of my characters, and I'll be sad to see it go. But if it isn't going to be updated any more, it's time to start looking for replacements.
There are a few competitors to Outfitter: ItemRack, ClosetGnome, Wardrobe, and in 3.1, Blizzard's official outfit manager. I haven't played with the official version much but as you may have geussed, it's feature-light, but relatively easy to use and very stable, like Blizzard's official implementations of addons generally are (see: floating combat text, in-game calendar).
ItemRack has been around for ages, and I used to use it before I used Outfitter. It tries to display a bar onscreen that you can use to quickly swap through items for your various slots, but it's not hard to dissuade it from that outrageous waste of screen real estate (see right). It lacks Outfitter's facilities for automatically building outfits for things like maximum frost resistance, although such automatically-built outfits usually require extensive manual tweaking. ItemRack also lacks Outfitter's nifty "used by [outfit]" tooltips for items, but we're looking for Outfitter alternatives here, I guess. Edit: Yes, I should mention that ItemRack has lots of facilities for hotkeys, automated swapping, etc. It is the closest to Outfitter in terms of feature parity, for sure.
ClosetGnome is a minimalist item set manager. You can't edit sets, but if you save a set with the same name as an existing set, it overwrites. You can't automatically equip sets under certain conditions, although other mods can interface with ClosetGnome to cause this to happen for you. It is probably the lightest-weight outfit manager, in terms of resources, and it's probably what I'll use whenever Outfitter breaks, because I don't really need a more complete feature set.
Wardrobe-AL also exists. It seems to combine the small feature set of ClosetGnome with the hostile interface of ItemRack, but if the other two don't work for you for some reason, you could give this one a try.
As for the official outfit changer coming in 3.1, I just went and tried it out on the PTR, and the best I can say for it is that it works. It has the absolute minimum feature set possible: you can save a set of items, and load it later. You can't save a partial set (containing only certain slots), as you can with every mod listed above. (Edit: apparently you can by use of the Alt key -- is this ever told to the users?) You can't edit sets. Allegedly you can assign hotkeys to outfits, but I couldn't figure out how. You can't load outfits automatically on certain conditions (like stances or forms). It's nice to see this in the default UI, but it probably isn't going to cut it, at least not for me.
So, in conclusion: Use ItemRack if you need advanced features or for some reason like its abomination of an item switch frame, otherwise use ClosetGnome. If you can't stand to use addons, the Blizzard version will help you a bit (but then, if you can't stand to use addons, you're probably not reading this column). Let me know in the comments if I missed any good outfit mods. And to Mundocani: thanks for all your work. You will be missed in the addon community.
Addons are what we do on Addon Spotlight. Need a bar mod? Want to quickly compare pieces of gear? Covered. And if you have any ideas for mods we should take a look at, drop us a line. Filed under: Items, Add-Ons, Features, AddOn Spotlight
Lunar Festival achievement guide
Blinded Iraq war vet raids with a little help
The latest Mists of Pandaria news
The latest patch 4.3 news







Reader Comments (Page 4 of 4)
Sarah Mar 24th 2009 11:38PM
Ugh, my favorite new add on (Wintergrasper Advanced) just ceased production too, now I know why. I know 3.1 will have the time on the map, but I like having it on the screen, and I really love WGA for their auto invite feature for WG raids. So far I haven't seen anything else that does this.
stillsong Mar 25th 2009 3:11AM
where can I find a list of addons that are going out of use because of blizzards policy?
ichik Mar 25th 2009 3:59AM
Actually you CAN edit sets in ClosetGnome.
Tondef Mar 25th 2009 8:20AM
While loosing Outfitter is inconvenient, I'm really worried about Group Calendar. The in-game Blizzard calendar doesn't come close to the usefulness of Group Calendar. Right now I'm just praying that it still works after 3.1 if not I guess my guild will have to search for a replacement, then go through a few months of getting everyone to change over, yada yada...
JDM Mar 25th 2009 9:09AM
I say wait, for now.
1. Outfitter -still works- currently, and will likely still be working until 3.1 is released, with Blizzard's own outfit interface.
2. If there is a need for additional features to Blizzard's outfit interface (and there likely will be), several "Outfitter (Fan's Update)" addons will make appearances, just like every other popular addon which was discontinued in the past.
Snakeman Mar 25th 2009 9:23AM
Itemrack is and has been for many many moons, so superior to Outfitter it's hard to put into words. Your bias is pretty funny, and very misplaced.
sluggyjunx Mar 25th 2009 10:08AM
I'm confused - what addons have "popup windows soliciting donations"? Is the donate tab/window/frame of an addon what they are talking about here? That's insane. I could respect the policy if addons were spamming the end-users for donations, with actual "pop-up windows" (like a website might do) but having a button on a tab/window/frame of an addon that says "donate if you like it" is certainly reasonable. I don't think there is one addon end user who would/does object to the "donate" button. Addons are such complex time sinks and are absolutely brilliant for game play. There is absolutely no reason a dev shouldn't have the opportunity to be compensated for their hard work and a "donate" button is acceptable and reasonable. I really hope Blizzard modifies/eases their policy and makes right moving forward.
Vargos Mar 25th 2009 10:14AM
I use Itemrack - and have tried Outfitter. Ultimately, just comes down to personal preference.
Johnwh Mar 26th 2009 10:23AM
lol........................
The thing is that all of the addons Bliz have incorperated are
epic fails when compared to the addons they replaced.
LFG.....failbot......V-chat.....a real tin-can on a string...Calendar..
yeah.....pretty box that tells you when the next Brewfest is.
Now on Blizs part, it really does make since to include gear swaping with dual spec so thumbs up there. I just wish that
they would stop being so lame about it.
Hone Melgren Mar 26th 2009 9:47AM
@eliah and the rest of the wow insider community
You as well as everyone else here seem to ignore the central issue that addon authors are really up in arms about.
It's never been about the money. In fact there is a good amount of addon authors who have never made any money from their addons , do not ask for donations and never intend to start asking for money.
They're objecting to the first clause.
Here I'll quote it for you
"1) Add-ons must be free of charge.
All add-ons must be distributed free of charge. Developers may not create "premium" versions of add-ons with additional for-pay features, charge money to download an add-on, charge for services related to the add-on, or otherwise require some form of monetary compensation to download or access an add-on."
Addons are possible via the API Blizzard makes public and lets the authors use
There is plenty of legal cases where a judge felt that what makes up an API (ie function names , variables , expected returns from function calls) are not unique enough to be copyrighted.
Addons are also not derivative works - meaning they are copyrighted to the author. Doesn't matter that the author is giving them out for free they are still copyrighted.
So given this what right does Blizzard have to govern a transaction that occurs outside their servers ?
You don't go to a blizzard site to download an addon. Everything to do with an addon before loading happens outside Blizzard's jurisidiction.
You can't pay someone to write a guild dkp addon for you. A man in Hamberg who catchs a train to Berlin to deliver an addon can't ask for
compensation.
They're effectively turning addon writing from a hobby to Slavery.
John Stephen Mar 26th 2009 2:32PM
Hone Melgren is exactly right that, for me anyhow, this about the rights authors have to control their own, original creations.
A few comments:
1) I've never charged for or advertised in my addons and I don't want donations. I don't care if this "must be free" policy has been around for years in the gaming community, it's still wrong and it's abusive of the time and energy it takes to develop and support a major addon. Even the open source community has accepted the "pay for support" model as a viable way to provide free software, but even that is forbidden by the new policies (can't charge for addon-related services).
2) I'm not asking anybody to stop using their existing copies of my addons. Also, I've been on the PTR prior to this and Group Calendar and Outfitter both seemed to work just fine with 3.1 so far.
3) I'm not stopping development, I'm stopping public distribution. I still have my addons available on my site and I don't mind if you want to re-distribute them to your friends and guildies via email or a private download section on your guild's site.
4) I'm waiting to hear Blizzard's response to all of this. If the developers who need or desire compensation for their time are happy with the outcome, then I'm happy. None of this policy change directly affects my work, but it does affect my sense of right and wrong.
5) Thank you. I have been putting off reading the comments section on this article because I feared it would be the same nasty hate that keeps cropping up in other public forums. I realize people disagree with my decision or they're angry that it affects them, but this affects me too. I appreciate that people here are able to express that without resorting to insanity.
I love playing WoW, I think Blizzard has created a great product which offers us all great entertainment value, and I love writing software. This doesn't change any of that.
If this all gets resolved then I'll begin posting my addons to Curse and WoWI again so that the auto-updaters can be used (yes, I like auto-updaters too). I'll also continue posting them to the forums on my own site, just as I already am.
But even if I begin posting to the public sites again, it'll be up to the users there to support each other. I don't think I will ever view public forums the same way again after all that I've read in the past week.
Wizardling Mar 31st 2009 2:12AM
Now that Outfitter's author has killed this excellent addon, what's the best option to automatically switch items when your cursor is over a mining node, you go swimming, or you mount up, etc? I just want something simple and easy that will do this as needed. Items sets alone are pretty pointless for me, cause I just forget to change sets manually till it's usually too late.
Tandalo Apr 3rd 2009 6:10PM
Now that WoW's equipment manager will not be included in 3.1, will this affect the decision by Outfitter's author to not distribute publicly?
Beelaa Apr 4th 2009 2:45AM
Well first of all, to John Stephen "Mundocani", I'd like to say thank you. Your addons have brought a significant enhancement to my game playing experience. I recognize the enormous amount of time and energy which you have put into this development and I thank you.
As for the text/jargon used in the Blizzard piece, I can only say that it is one more example of lawyers justifying their existence and outrageous fees. They recognized that Carbonite's fee based premium addon "might" weaken Blizz's position in some future, unseen, untold legal case, and they sought to eliminate that possibility immediately. I am certain that it was not written by anyone having knowledge, involvement, appreciation or respect for the gaming community.
I would also like to applaud John Stephen's generosity in making his product available for private distribution, and I have googled my fingers to the bone trying to find his website. I discovered that there is a John Stephen in the fashion industry; one who is running for congress in some state; one who is associated with Urban Outfitters ... but alas, not to the addon developer Mundocani. The closest I came was an email address on wowwiki which connected to ... nowhere.
So if someone can give me some insight into this quest, I could use a little help. I am also proud to be part of the Wowinsider community who for the most part were considerate and respectful to John Stephen in this forum.
/salute
jay Apr 14th 2009 1:51PM
I hope this can be some useful info for someone trying to decide. I use ItemRack, and the features that I find most useful are...
-A flyout for easy selecting/swapping of individual gear slots in the character pane.
-Of course... I can configure sets of gear and assign a name & icon of my choosing.
-A Fubar and/or minimap button dropdown with icons to select the set I want to equip. (the fubar button is a separate addon I believe)
This is pretty much all I use it for, and it does a flawless job of it. There may be other features, but I haven't cared to explore them yet.