Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-24-2009 @ 4:03PM
PopeJamal said...
"(a strong statement, since you'd think anyone putting time and work into an addon should get something back for it)"
You know, I know people who put quite a bit of time and effort into stealing shit and just generally cheating their way out of everything. I mean they put ALOT of work into it. Hours of discussion, plans, all that stuff. Does that mean that they have the "right" to "get something back for it"?
Just because YOU decide to do something:
-Doesn't mean it has value
-Doesn't mean it's a valuable as YOU think it is
-Doesn't entitle you to anything other than saying "Look what I did!"
Jesus Christ. I swear to God, sometimes this place is a cesspool of stupidity...
Reply
3-24-2009 @ 4:53PM
RGnome said...
The original statement said directly "putting time and work into an addon". That's an ADDON. It's not ambiguously stating anyone putting effort towards anything should be rewarded for whatever it is they are doing.
No where in the article does it suggest every addon is worthy of monetary reimbursement. In fact the very last statement ( "if an addon like Recount does charge to go visit another site and get DPS meters, they'll have to make sure it's worth paying that amount rather than just using a free addon") suggests that the author does believe a level of service and quality is required to sustain any addon that would ask it's users pay or donate to continue releasing new versions.
This article is about a blanket statement by blizzard regarding donation policies that are severely limiting every addon developers possible revenue streams. It is not about some kid in a basement looking to monetize and exploit an idea to make all frames a bright green because he finds it aesthetically pleasing.
Surely you can admit that hundreds of hours of code time put into a tool that thousands of people use daily deserves some sort of compensation.