Skip to Content
4-06-2009 @ 8:41AM
To clarify, I think the concept of Wintergrasp is great. I love the vehicles, and the turrets and the siege-like aspects of it. I just think the implementation is terrible. I think it's great that people swarm into WG when it's happening - but if the hardware that Blizzard uses can't handle that kind of client load, and causes the whole thing to come to a laggy halt, it loses it's appeal. I think the technical end of it should have been the #1 priority, and Blizzard has seemed to just accept it as it stands - which is something they do a lot of.If WG had normal lag and they got rid of tenacity - then I think it would be a gem. Right now, it's a pile of poop.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.