Why we should expect an expansion announcement at Blizzcon

We're almost six months into Wrath's lifespan. Patch 3.1 is just around the corner, and before too long we'll be talking about 3.2. I anticipate 3.2 will come out quicker than most content patches and that 3.3 will be on its way soon after. After that, I'm willing to put good money on an expansion following it. We've had a lot of hints and solid information ready to back up a Q4 2009 expansion release, and even hints about what the content in it would be.
Here's what we know.
- There's a Blizzcon this year.
There hasn't been a Blizzard-run event in the past four years without a product announcement. Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 are both already announced. The next-gen MMO is way too far off to warrant any kind of announcement. Yes, there may be a mystery fifth project, but an expansion announcement is far more likely at this point.
Those who're ready to argue with me and say "well they could be using Blizzcon to announce a beta for SC2 or D3 or announcing their release dates", remember that they didn't do this for Wrath or BC.
- There's probably no raid coming in 3.2.
All reports indicate a new Battleground coming in 3.2, along with an instance related to the Argent Tournament. If there's a raid coming in 3.2, they've been incredibly mum about it, especially given how open they were regarding raid progression in BC. I'm inclined to believe that this means that Icecrown is the next and likely only big raid coming in Wrath after Ulduar. Yes, I know that Jeff Kaplan said there was going to be a mystery raid in 3.2 at Blizzcon. I have my reasons for doubting it, but there's still time for me to be proven wrong.
What this means is that the raiding lifespan of WOTLK is likely shorter than BC's or vanilla's. This indicates a quicker expansion successor.
- Dev and Community are being very open with us regarding content additions, changes, and features.
Ghostcrawler is leading the vanguard of better communication regarding changes coming down the pipe, class theorycrafting dialogue, and new content. But what does this have to do with the expansion? Read below.
- CMs and devs are teasing the hell out of us.
So far CMs and devs have dropped believable hints about the following:
• Use of phasing in the old world
• Opening Greymane Wall
• Bringing zones that exist but don't exist to the forefront (Gilneas, Kul Tiras, etc)
Gilneas and Kul Tiras are both nations with strong ties to the sea, and both are currently inaccessible to players. Near them is the troll nation of Zul'Dare and the isle of Crestfall. Near the Maelstrom in the ocean's center are a large number of islands, like Kezan, Tel'Abim, Hiji, Zandalar and the Broken Isles. This is a ton of possible content should they go the South Seas route with the expansion. And what better neutral city than the bustling home of the goblin trade princes, Undermine?
On a different side of things, there's the ever-present Emerald Dream theory.
Chris Metzen says that Malfurion Stormrage is not only getting his own novel but will soon become an important character in the game again. This points heavily to use of the Emerald Dream, since that's, you know, where he
currently is.
The Dream isn't just a "new continent," though.
- The Emerald Dream, in lore, contains prototypes of Azeroth.
This is actually a really great piece of information. It opens up a lot of cool ideas for where we'll go and what we'll do when the expansion lands.
Remember that the Dream isn't affected by what happened to real Azeroth, so, for example, the Sundering never happened, leaving Azeroth one giant mass instead of three sundered shards. It wouldn't necessary play by the same rules as current zones, meaning some (Blasted Lands, for example) would be absent and some (where Zin-Azshari would be) would still be there now.
The possibilities are exciting and pretty much endless.
In summary, here's what my Magic 8-ball is telling me.
• We're getting a new expansion sometime this year.
• It'll be announced at Blizzcon.
• It'll involve old-world content or zones in some way.
• It'll involve the Maelstrom, the Emerald Dream, or both.
• There's going to be a new hero class or race.
No matter what, I'm excited. Blizzard has learned a lot since launch and I'm sure they'll give us an even bigger and better experience with whatever comes next -- even better than the fantastic expansion we're playing currently.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 7 of 7)
Exro Apr 12th 2009 1:50AM
drahliana, thanks :)
now that is interesting, the reason why I wanted to know more about the Dream, and everything to do with it, was because, I am writing a story for blizzards creative writing contest, and in the story, I had the blasted lands, but since i found this out, I had to rewrite most of the material, this has helped me out quite a bit....to be more accurate, thanks again.
Kaneda979 Apr 10th 2009 8:44PM
If Blizzard does announce a new expansion at Blizz Con, it'll be the best new I've heard all year. And if it is going to add to the game most or all that you listed above, I will be happier then a monkey's uncle!
I can totally see the Dream Emerald being like the WoW version of the Matrix. Being able to be the rules of reality and such, but on a WarCraft level. So bad ass.
Only thing is, if Goblins become the new Horde race, which I've been wanting this for years now, and I can not wait to see the Goblin city, what race would the Alliance get though? And would there be a new class that Goblins can can be? If not, then what current classes would Goblins get, besides DK? And finally, what would be the new Hero class or what should be the next Hero class?
themightysven Apr 10th 2009 11:05PM
no one's going to read this, but I'll post anyway, you know, for posterity.
I think the biggest mistake of WotLK was having 10 and 25 flavors of the same raids. This makes people A. get tired of content faster and B. start to fight over which is better. EoE and OS should be 10 mans, Naxx 25. (ideally Ulduar would be 10 man, or have separate 10 man and 25 man wings)
3.2 AN (with a backdoor to ICC)
New Battleground, Gnomes and Trolls
3.2.5 Ziggurat in IC and Something Awesome in Crystalsong
3.3 ICC (I really want this to be a 40 man, because it's the freaking Lich King man (maybe 25 with 25 npc dps helpers from the opposite faction [some with weird classes, Gnome Druid, Forsaken Paladin anyone?]
4.0 I would like a profession that makes shields, wands, bows, staves... but lumberjacking is not going to happen. maybe they could break subpar items for the wood, then use skins, furs, and feathers to make the items thus using skinning.
new races, not Goblins, especially not if Undermine is the Neutral City. Realistic Possiblities include Ogres (warrior priest warlock mage shaman), Worgen (warrior, rogue, warlock, mage, hunter) Murlocs (warrior, rogue, shaman, priest, druid) and Kobolds (Paladin [they are always talking about their candle, maybe they mean the light from a Naaru?] mage, rogue, priest, hunter)
new classes: http://www.wowwiki.com/Spirit_walker or http://www.wowwiki.com/Shadow_hunter could be adapted for a Healer/Dps role
setting Malestorm looks most likely, Gilneas, Broken Isles and Azshara as raids ED is difficult and could be a final expansion, with each class having a separate starting zone + dungeon, then a few mixed zones Raids would be Uldum and Grim Batol while investigating the source of the Nightmare. [a bit of the princess is in another castle] before fighting the true form of Saregas in the last raid
Raz Apr 11th 2009 9:31AM
I read your post :)
I also enjoyed it.
themightysven Apr 11th 2009 9:54AM
Yay :)
Sleutel Apr 11th 2009 1:25AM
WoW: November 2004
TBC: January 2007 (2 years, 2 months later)
Wrath: November 2008 (1 year, 10 months later)
There have, so far, been about two years between releases, give or take. Announcing another expansion so soon after this one, ESPECIALLY for release by the end of 2009, would piss off a lot of players who expect more content before being asked to shell out more dough in addition to their subscription fees.
It's possible that they'd announce general themes for the next expansion, but I'd put money down that it would absolutely not be released before late winter/early spring 2010.
Enigma Apr 11th 2009 2:50AM
This all sound really impressive but to think a new expansion is coming out a year after the last one just came out is incredibly foolish. I like everything Michael said but to think Blizzard can pop all this out on top of 2 patches for WoW, 2 new games, a new MMO, and a new project is just stupid. The time it would take to develop all this content would take more than a year so and having a new expansion come out by years end would really take away from the content that Wrath has offered and will offer with patches 3.1-3.3. If anything we'll get the next WoW expansion by fall 2010 the earliest. Every idea he said was cool but takes time to develop, thinking it would be out by Q4 09 is just trying to fool yourself.
Raz Apr 11th 2009 9:27AM
Sweet tap dancing Christ, we're not even to the first major content patch... no new expansion please- not yet anyways. As much as I want there to be another expansion, I don't want it in a year- things we already have need fixed & polished before more features are added.
Balanced PvP, motivation to play in battlegrounds, challenging and worthwhile 10/25man raids (maybe some you can't just pug in 10 minutes),.. just some things that come to mind. I'd rather see current problems fixed & enjoy the happy balance for a while before we have more "selling points" thrown around.
Dual Specs: an improvement on things we already have (respeccing/talent trees)
Gear Manager: will eventually improve things that WoW is already capable of doing whether you use the addon or type out macros to equip offsets.
These are good things.
Hero Classes: Death Knights are fun, but they're not anywhere near balanced yet & all of us with DK alts know it.
Hero Class said "Let's play Rock, Paper, Scissors" and went "1,2,3, shoot... Mine looks like an airlplane- I win!"
Arenas and Battlegrounds: huge drops in participation.
While I know some Blues are taking comfort in the possibility that it's the lack of "free epics" driving away "moochers" or some such nonsense, I'd like to put another theory out there; it's not fun anymore, it's frustrating. Even if you join a queue for a change of pace, three 10min battlegrounds later of unbalanced team numbers/unbalanced classes or specs destroying anyone in sight with no fear of death, et cetera.. you don't want to do it anymore. You didn't go in for free honor because most of the honor gear is a distant third to pug-raid gear & BoE Auction epics, but you sure as hell left because it wasn't fun.
I hope I'm not the only one who feels this way- I just want what I currently have to kick so much ass that I can be pleasantly surprised at a 4.0 announcement whenever it may come, instead of being so unsatisfied that I start looking for a future hope to grasp onto and asking for more.
StoNe Apr 11th 2009 9:54AM
I remember Blizz saying one EP a year...wouldn't surprise me if they pull it off, if there is anything I have learned about Blizz, they would have two teams for patches and EP's, and prolly started iut before the release of WotLK
Also...I think they have to include raids every patch, even though most people wo'n tsee it...raiders expect it.
As for Blizz comments, I remember them saying that they'd hate o think that players expect to increase the level cap every expansion. Maybe that means the next one could get the ball rolling and still be lvl 80 cap.
As for Hero classes, well they still have Demon Hunters, Runecasters (melee/magic), Necromancers, and if Blizzard are smart, adopt a dps healer class...that heals the group as they dps spawning a fun dps healer class.
Also I know rumours aim towards Maelstrom because of the:
- underwater mounts
- longer underwater breathing
- no more dismount of mounts
- faster swim speeds
I just don’t want to see an increase of the level cap, I'm sick of grinding quests and replacing purples for greens :/
arrogance Apr 11th 2009 11:04AM
i'm leaning more towards them announcing a new mmo.
camf1991 Apr 11th 2009 12:00PM
This year is far too soon in my opinion unless you really want another mishap like 3.0.8 An announcement would be cool, and a beta would be reasonable, but a full blown release? I also feel like that would put a little too much rush on players to move through raids. We have had Five months (correct me if I am wrong) to do nax. Even if they drastically shortened the length between 3.1 and3.3 (assuming no additional raid in 3.2) that still seems short.
Frorgon Apr 11th 2009 12:26PM
I think they will most certainly announce the expansion at Blizzcon. It will fall in line with how they announced BC in the past. No way it'll come out this year though. Spring 2010 seems like a good bet, especially because there likely won't be a 3.4 with another raid like Sunwell because they thought that was a mistake.
I'm assuming there will be at least one new hero class, and maybe more. The one I'm hoping for the most is demon hunter, I would main change immediately because it's my favorite class in lore. It makes sense because of the night elves' involvement in the emerald dream/sundering. We should have already had them with the BC expansion and Illidan as the main focus.
Minifig (Draka server) Apr 11th 2009 5:14PM
There's going to be a new hero class or race.
Why not both?
Ben Darlow Apr 11th 2009 5:31PM
"We've had a lot of hints and solid information ready to back up a Q4 2009 expansion release".
Either that's a typo, or you're high as a kite. Allow me to explain:
The Burning Crusade was announced in October 2005, completely independent of any specific Blizzard conference event. It was then released in January 2007 - a whole 15 months later.
Wrath of the Lich King was announced in August 2007, and released in November 2008 - 15 months later.
The 3.1 content patch has been in development in some form or another for nearly 5 months. Blizzard has intimated that it's basically been started 'from scratch' and so has required the full resources of artists and content creators as well as developers - artists and content creators who might otherwise be working on this mythical next expansion. And yet you somehow think that within the next 8 months they'll be able to complete two more content patches AND a major expansion release?
Don't get me wrong; I think that based on the previous schedule of releases, it's quite possible that Blizzard will announce the next expansion at Blizzcon this year. But to hope for it to arrive this year isn't just wishful thinking, but ignorant of the kind of effort that goes into these releases.
Rumik Apr 12th 2009 6:06AM
There's no way there's going to be a new expansion released this year. Announced, MAYBE, released? Definitely not. How long did WotLK take to make? 2 years? If Blizzard are going to release another expansion on the same scale as WotLK then it's going to take time - plus they still have patches 3.2 and 3.3 to develop (as well as inbetween patches). I have no doubt that they've started development (they would have had a small team starting work on it towards the end of development on WotLK) so they may be ready to make an announcement, but I think we'll be very lucky to see this new expansion released before the end of NEXT year.
KC Apr 12th 2009 6:32AM
What kind of article is this? Everything you wrote is pure speculation with nothing to back it up.
"Yes, there may be a mystery fifth project, but an expansion announcement is far more likely at this point."
Yeah? and you know this to is 100% true how ?
"If there's a raid coming in 3.2, they've been incredibly mum about it...(more BS)...I have my reasons for doubting it, but there's still time for me to be proven wrong."
Please tell us those reasons because SURELY you at least one more than, "blizz cant make a new BG and raid instance at the same time!"
Then for the other half of your so called article you just went on and on about what the next expansion could be instead of elaborating on the TITLE "why we should expect a expansion announcement at blizzcon".
OH by the way, saying "I anticipate", "Im willing to put money on", "We've had a lot of hints and solid information(where is it b/c I dont see it in this article)" DOESNT give you credibility it makes you look like a know-it-all and an ignorant douche. It also doesnt reflect well on you as a blogger, reporter, definitely not as journalist and the worse bit, it wastes reader's time!
jimson Apr 13th 2009 8:18AM
nice hostility KC. someone piss in your wheaties this morning? the article doesn't claim to be anything more than speculation. plus, if the author has signed an NDA, then he's using legally and ethically appropriate language such as "I anticipate" and "I'm willing to put money on..."
for example, i speculate that the new ally race will be worgen. i can't back this up. it just seems...unexpected and kind of fitting with the greymane wall storyline...to me. especially if they do old-world phasing, starting zones can be added/mixed-up.
Ziezo Apr 14th 2009 1:06PM
Patch 3.2 got something like an "Isle of Quel'Danas", check the new rings going in 3.1 http://www.wowinsider.com/photos/patch-3-1-kirin-tor-rings/ + the lower cooldown on HS.
And I guess our new heroesclass is a battery> mana/ rage/ energyregen like a bard type.
(A carpenter could also make music instruments and well the new advanced dancing would be handy also)
Have fun with 3.1!
nate806 May 29th 2009 7:57AM
The picture is exactly what I was thinking for an expansion. The Emerald Dream. I have had a lot of in-depth discussions with people over lore, and what could possibly be next, it was either Emerald Dream or the Maelstrom. More than likely the Emerald Dream though. That's IF it were to be a new expansion, at the very least a content patch.
pandarenskinner Jul 2nd 2009 3:06PM
Stop using pandaren skin colthes! free them! (or just find them...)