Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-13-2009 @ 11:01PM
Raventouched said...
I get that they want to keep the Horde/Alliance conflict going, but I'm going to nitpick just for a little fun.
It seems strange to me that we would be going into Ulduar at all if this is the reaction of our leaders. I understand that some intrepid adventurers might go, but certainly with the scope of this place it would take significant resources from the fight against Arthas, as well as from the fight between the Horde and the Alliance. As a Horde character I would assume that from Thrall's reaction he would likely send in a significant strike force since he was disappointed in Garrosh's behavior and seemed interested in the issue. Would that mean that the Alliance would be trying to keep up with the Horde in raiding this place? I guess I'm just wondering why as a member of the Horde or Alliance I would stop fighting the Scourge if my leader didn't support it...
Reply
4-14-2009 @ 6:15AM
Muse said...
Jaina. Her word carries significant weight within the Alliance. And Brann. If he tells his brother "need help" he'd have every dwarf in Ironforge at his disposal the next day.
4-14-2009 @ 7:40PM
Draimen said...
@muse
Jaina even has a good amount of say in what the Horde does, because Thrall and Jaina get along very well.