Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-24-2009 @ 11:22AM
m0wglie said...
You're missing something.
If people like 10-man raiding is better than 25-man raiding (except for the loot), why are Blizzard bothering to develop 25-man versions of their dungeons at all?
Reply
4-24-2009 @ 11:25AM
Caz said...
This was addressed in the OP. 25 mans hvhe better loot=longer life span of the content overall.
4-24-2009 @ 11:26AM
Caz said...
my spelling today=fail
4-24-2009 @ 11:32AM
Wistin said...
I think they have it worked out pretty well, really. The guild I am in is not large enough to do a 25 man. We did have almost enough interest exactly one raid day during the last cycle of WoTLK.
I do not agree with the sentiment that 10 man should be a trainer for 25 man. In some cases, 10 man is even harder than 25, but not to the degree that the loot has to be equal. It is as close to equal but seperate paths that I think they can do.
I'm fine with the way it is and do not begrudge any 25 man player what they find from their experiencing of the content.
4-24-2009 @ 11:40AM
temporis said...
Because, Mowglie, there are only two reasons to do 25 man content: Better loot, and to polish your epeen at the bank in Dalaran in front of 10 man raiders. Epeen/ego is a powerful drug for some.