Skip to Content
4-24-2009 @ 11:22AM
You're missing something.If people like 10-man raiding is better than 25-man raiding (except for the loot), why are Blizzard bothering to develop 25-man versions of their dungeons at all?
4-24-2009 @ 11:25AM
This was addressed in the OP. 25 mans hvhe better loot=longer life span of the content overall.
4-24-2009 @ 11:26AM
my spelling today=fail
4-24-2009 @ 11:32AM
I think they have it worked out pretty well, really. The guild I am in is not large enough to do a 25 man. We did have almost enough interest exactly one raid day during the last cycle of WoTLK.I do not agree with the sentiment that 10 man should be a trainer for 25 man. In some cases, 10 man is even harder than 25, but not to the degree that the loot has to be equal. It is as close to equal but seperate paths that I think they can do. I'm fine with the way it is and do not begrudge any 25 man player what they find from their experiencing of the content.
4-24-2009 @ 11:40AM
Because, Mowglie, there are only two reasons to do 25 man content: Better loot, and to polish your epeen at the bank in Dalaran in front of 10 man raiders. Epeen/ego is a powerful drug for some.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.