The Azeroth Ethicist: Special I.W.I.N. edition
In reading the commentary on the site concerning the brouhaha surrounding Martin Fury and The Marvel Family's steamrolling of raid content, there were a lot of assertions made that left an impression on me, but the overwhelming feeling I had coming away from it was the players were treating it as a TOS issue when ultimately it's not. For obvious reasons, Blizzard doesn't spend a lot of time creating specific rules for what happens when players get ahold of items that are not officially supposed to exist. I do, however, believe it to be a moral issue.Was Karatechop wrong to use the shirt, or just wrong past a certain point?
Someone made of stricter stuff than myself would probably say that it was wrong to use the shirt at all, but I have to admit -- I don't have it in me to condemn Karatechop's initial impulse to try it out. GM items don't officially exist for players; we know about them only because they've been data-mined, and you'd have to be a fairly frequent habitué of Warcraft fan sites to have any inkling that they're in the game at all. If I'd been in Karatechop's position, like many players I would've believed that Martin Fury was a joke when I first saw it. Who honestly expects to run across an item like that, let alone one that was mailed to a guildie's level 13 Warlock? I don't believe Karatechop was wrong to try the shirt when he had no reason to believe it was anything other than a joke or some bizarre glitch.
However, from an ethical perspective, things get a lot murkier once you enter the territory in which:
A). You know beyond the shadow of a doubt that the item is real and works as described, and (here's the ethically relevant bit):
B). You derive significant and repeated personal benefit from using it.
Karatechop had to have known that A was true the instant after he one-shot Ignis (which was, I believe, the first in a series of both 10-man and 25-man raid boss kills that began on April 20th and ended April 25th). It was incontrovertible proof that Martin Fury was the real deal.
And B became true as of the moment that he and his guildies started getting multiple hard-mode achievements that they could not otherwise have done without the effort and time expended by other guilds worldwide to get the same result.
A + B = a big mess
There is a moral issue, albeit a somewhat less serious one, with having one-shot that first Ignis-10 fight. Would it have been better for them to try it outside of a raid? Yes, but from what Karatechop's said of the incident, it hadn't been tried at all prior to the guild's Ulduar-10 run on April 20th, and they didn't know whether it worked at all. As they quickly found out, it does, and people who were present for the "kill" thought it was extremely funny.
Did they benefit from the Ignis-10 insta-kill? Certainly -- they got the realm-first Ignis-10 Stokin' the Furnace from it -- but absent having tried the item, they had no reason to believe it was genuine. If they'd realized exactly what they had on their hands at that point, finished laughing about it, and then agreed that it was wrong for them to keep Martin Fury (much less use it) and submitted a GM ticket, I don't think anyone would have been banned or even received a suspension. GM's would've faced the nuisance of having to roll back the achievement and kill, but the raid would have satisfied its curiosity as to the intent and function of Martin Fury and demonstrated a commendable level of honesty in not wishing to "cheat" on further content with its use. From a moral perspective, I think The Marvel Family gets a pass on Ignis-10.
However, they don't have a reasonable excuse for continuing to use the item, and there's a much more uncomfortable moral issue with the fact that they proceeded to one-shot 13 additional raid bosses. I believe the nature of the content they chose to one-shot also puts to rest any argument over whether there was an incentive in continuing to use the item besides mere curiosity.
It's particularly disconcerting that they -- and by "they," I mean not only Karatechop, but the guildies who were aware of the item's existence and tacitly approved of its presence in the raid -- chose to use it on what had remained progression content in Tier 7 for them. GuildOx lists their first Malygos kill, plus A Poke in the Eye and You Don't Have An Eternity, as occurring April 21st. The guild also went on to get their guild-first Sarth-25 3D and Sarth-10 3D that same night, which rewarded them with two new titles and two mounts. They then proceeded to 8 server-first hard-mode achievements in Ulduar-25 (among them at least apparent one world-first on If Looks Could Kill).
I'm sympathetic to Karatechop's insistence that nothing apart from pure fun was intended by their intentional trivialization of raid content -- it must have been funny as hell -- but that sympathy starts to look more and more ill-placed once you add up the achievements, titles, loot, and mounts they amassed. They got more than fun out of this, and this became progressively more true with each raid boss.
Does Karatechop's intent matter here?
Yes and no. Karatechop's innocent intent concerning Martin Fury can be accepted at face value re: Ignis-10, but it becomes much harder to accept at face value with each subsequent boss kill, to the point where the guild's intent effectively became irrelevant. The guild knew that use of the shirt would continue to result in one-shots. Thus, the argument that no harm was meant or accomplished by The Marvel Family's actions starts to ring a bit hollow once you consider the extent to which they repeatedly profited from Martin Fury within a very short span of time. If their intent was only to have fun using the item on the game's most advanced content, why choose to use it on fights that were no longer cutting edge (Malygos/Sarth 3D) but were still considered "progression" content for the guild itself?
Why do previous content (Sarth-10/25 3D) that rewarded mounts and titles?
Why go to the trouble of doing both versions of the Sarth fight but ignore Malygos-10 and both forms of Naxx?
And -- most interestingly -- why haul the shirt out for 25-man content in Ulduar only after the guild wiped several times on the Flame Leviathan encounter?
I believe Karatechop when he says that the guild had a lot of fun doing this -- it would be almost impossible not to have fun one-shotting the most dangerous content in the game -- but having fun isn't incompatible with having profited from the item to a morally questionable degree. Nor is it incompatible with having screwed everyone else on Veknilash out of a shot at legitimate server-firsts, and had the capacity to screw the rest of the world out of firsts as well. The shirt enabled them to do things that world-first competitive raiding guilds can't presently do, and it's entirely possible that The Marvel Family could even have achieved a world-first Algalon kill if they'd kept going and had the sense not to advertise what they were doing in trade chat. The limiting factor was solely that the guild got caught before raiding beyond Auriaya, not that they coudn't do it.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Cheats, Features, Bosses, Achievements
Transmog yourself into an Avenger!
6 blue posts to read before Diablo 3's launch
Cross-realm zones coming soon
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news







Reader Comments (Page 3 of 3)
Siaperas May 5th 2009 3:53PM
I have to first acknowledge that I did enjoy the discussion about the ethics of using Martin Fury. Provided an argument, that while I don't wholey agree with it, still provided a perspective I hadn't though about before.
I also wanted to point out the fun little gem in this article being the story about Overrated getting permibanned months before TBC was released. Kind of fun to take a walk down memory lane and wonder, "If they had known that TBC was going to come out a few months later and completely trivialize all the raid gear with its first zone, would they have still done what they did?"
I'd recommend the read on those stories, it's a piece of nostalgia about as good as an old Ninja Turtle picture.
Flatlander May 5th 2009 4:07PM
Are you still writing about this? I guess with 3.1 being launched there's not much left to talk about huh?
Dave May 5th 2009 4:13PM
The only amusing thing about this story anymore, is the amount of high and mighty people who claim they would be all goody twoshoes and give it back to blizzard.
You're all liars.
Until someone got banned for doing it, you'd have done the exact same thing, although perhaps not in ulduar but hey who knows. You'd have had your fun with it and done exactly the same thing UNLESS you already knew you'd get banned for it.
Threatening your precious account causes you to change your opinion on what's "right" doesn't it? I'd sure use it. I'd use it and I'd enjoy it. It's not like I'm exploiting anything, I was given the item. If the item exists and it was given to a player, that's not my fault!
If an ATM suddenly gave you a thousand dollars and it didn't come out of your bank account, would you REALLY be in a hurry to give it back to the bank? Of course you wouldn't, don't lie on an internet blog just to look like you're the best good guy in the entire world!
If an ATM gave you a thousand dollars, but there were 3 cops standing around the corner waiting to see what you'd do with it with the intention to haul you off to jail for hacking an ATM machine or something absurd (even though you didn't do it and the ATM just gave you the money), of COURSE you'd say "I would never ever do it officer, seriously what? Free money, no sir not for me!".
You impress nobody when you lie about what you'd do in a game knowing the consequences in retrospect.
Blizzard overreacted, likely in every avenue up to and including firing the GM who accidentally did it.
That's pretty much it, case closed. Nobody deserves to be banned for getting a win button in the mail and actually using it.
vexis58 May 5th 2009 4:40PM
I honestly wouldn't use a GM item that ended up in my mailbox. I might not tell the GMs about it immediately, I'd be more likely to just keep it in my bank as a "hey look what I've got" thing, but I wouldn't use it. I don't even see what's fun about that.
If I ended up with too much money in my bank account due to some error, of course I'm not going to spend it. It isn't mine.
I like how you assume everyone else has the same morals you do, and if they say they don't, they must be lying.
Adamanthis May 5th 2009 4:52PM
Yikes. The other day someone walking past me dropped her wallet and didn't notice. Was I foolish to run after her and hand it back?
As for a GM item, I wouldn't. I don't need to use a moral argument, just a selfish one: it would pretty much destroy my interest in the game. Any game I've ever tried out on a "God mode" cheat was always over within minutes for me. Even after returning to normal mode, the challenge and illusion of the game world remain broke, haven been reduced to mere button-pushing.
Craig May 5th 2009 5:58PM
Dave,
Just because you think everyone else in the world follows your same moral compass, doesn't make it so.
I don't. I think that the cheaters got what they had coming.
Decrusher May 5th 2009 4:42PM
plz wow insider i beg you... LET KARATECHOP DIE! this has been so massively over-reported it makes me sick. plz plz plz just let it die
Stormtamer May 5th 2009 4:52PM
I agree with Allison Robert. We can't deny the fact that it was used for fun AND for personal achievement and gains with an obscure, clearly abusive and morally wrong use of an improperly given item.
They and the blizzard's responsible for giving the item are guilty (but with different charges) .
Fortone May 5th 2009 5:58PM
Wow we are still debating ideas like this old one?
flashoverride May 5th 2009 8:30PM
Someone said soething about "people playing this game like there are no consequences". Well, no shit. That's what makes it a GAME, dumbass. That's what seperate a GAME from REAL LIFE. Some other equally stupid poster equated use of this item to stealing. Really? Stealing? IT'S A PIECE OF FSCKING CODE. It doesn't really get made. There are an inifinite number of them. If Blizzard decided to hand every single player in WoW Thunderfury, all it would take on the technical end would be the execution of some code.
Items in WoW are not real.
Also, there's this endless harping on ethics and morality. Ethics and morality have nothing to do with WoW. WoW is a business, a business like a Casino, a bar, or any other entertainment venue - it's just that it's interactive. Blizzard is a company, and they make money with WoW. They will take whatever steps are neccesary to protect their revenue stream - as they have a fiduciary duty to do so - regardless of ethics or morality "in game". The developers might be RPers, but I assure you that the Board members are more interested in uptime, subscriptions, and electrical usage than anything in-game. In this case, for whatever reason, they figured that perma-banning his account would be the path that would save them the most money or cost them the least to enforce. A ban probably takes .5 man-hours, whereas going in and undoing all of the things he and his guild did would take several more, costing the company money. Also, if he desires to continue playing, he will have to establish a new account - and purchase *all* of the software again, as your key is tied to your account.
In short, the ethics in play here have more to do with money than with qq'ing players.
blightmare May 5th 2009 10:57PM
If his name was light i think i would have to change my name lol
and stand clear of darkfallen
Link May 6th 2009 3:08PM
... It's just a game.
OQ May 6th 2009 11:50AM
I agree with FlashOveride. Want to talk ethics? Talk to Blizzard about what really motivates them period. Cash. There is nothing about right or wrong here it is Blizzard looking after their own best interest not the players. Blizzard has lost track of a lot of things including their almighty "essence" of WOW. You, the players are the "essence" of WOW. The fact that they know they have you all hooked allows them to make ridiculous rules, threaten you with banning for not following whatever interpretation of their TOS/EULA that happens to strike their fancy at the time. Don't think you are addicted? Stop playing for 2 weeks or even 1 month. Blizzard has created a culture of people who spend money and precious time out of their life in a fantasy world and try to make people believe that there are ethics in this fantasy world where they are the gods. GM's? HAH laughable. These lowlifes that are "omnipotent" in the WORLD OF WARCRAFT go back home to their parent's basements. Do you really want to feel bad because these dweebs threaten you with possible banning even if it is their mistake? Stop wasting your life on WOW, use it as an occasional distraction for entertainment if you want but not as a life devotion. It's not that serious, it is not worthy of all this brain power and debate. It's a fucking game. Show Blizzard who actually controls the game, it's not the GM's its you. If you didn't play they would all have to go back to spending time with each other in their parent's basements. Read BRK's reason for why he stopped playing. Read how he feels about his family and time once he took a step back and looked at how much of his life he was devoting to WOW when he had a real life, real world family that missed him and that depended on him as well. Blizzard makes mistakes and penalizes the players. The GM that mailed it should have been fired, the players should all have apologies sent to them, with free play time. Blizzard should be boycotted until this has be rectified and all of you need to let Blizzard know that you control the game not them.
tallpagangirl May 13th 2009 3:16PM
I just want to know. Did the email in which the item was received include a note advising/warning against its use? Blizzard has mailed us all unique items. And part of what makes WOW fun and so long lived is how things are bound to change including new items. Perhaps this item should have been known to be "abnormal" but that is assuming much for someone to figure that. If I'm sent an item unsolicited and with out instructions then I have no obligation to email support and verify wether I can use it. Perhaps I was the 1,000,000 person to hit level 80!
Most people do n ot look a gift horse in the mouth. And not doing so is nothing one should be punished for.
WhiteRhinoPSO Jun 8th 2009 8:17PM
I have a little conspiracy theory of my own as to what this is all about. Blizzard made an example of Karatechop. He was just the patsy to the whole event. People game-wise claim the GMs don't seem to do a damn thing about half the problems people have. Spammers, goldfarmers, griefers and non-RP names on RP servers.
So they dropped a shirt into someone's mail as innocent as can be. They waited and watched for the shirt to be used a few times so they could bring down the hammer as hard as they could, with a permaban. Why? To show the players that the GMs are not nice people who are fully capable of bringing down fiery wrath.
Yeah, he screwed people out of a server-first achievement or two, his friends got some gear that they should have gotten if they earned it. Some people forget that Blizzard also dropped a ban on Guild members who were simply online while Karatechop was off using the shirt wether they were part of the group or not.
It's not about morals or game exploits or being fair or not. It's about Blizzard wanting to prove to people that there is someone awake at the switch, and he's got an itchy trigger finger.