Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-06-2009 @ 10:36AM
Daniel said...
I agree. This statement is totally bogus: "designed to be non-instanced, and that's why a lot of people like it."
"Eventually, you have to think the population will drop back down"
Exactly. So instead of taking the initiative and doing it themselves, Blizzard is going to wait until players, in effect, instance WG themselves. How charming.
It may very well be true that it ultimately is a throughput problem, but Blizz had to know that before they designed it. If Blizz can't design it so it's lag free without instancing, them they might as well instance it.