Skip to Content
5-10-2009 @ 4:14AM
Whilst i don't think the language used here is a good way to not get instantly dismissed, he's got a valid point.We all know about the easier, more effective compositions. Rogue/Mage/Priest. Death Knight/Paladin. Warrior/Druid back in S3/S4.All that jazz. There combos we know exist. There combos we know that work. We don't really need to hear much from the people that can top the charts with these lineups.Get the highest rated team with the wierdest composition on The Colosseum. Maybe there's a Hunter/Hunter comp? 3 Enhancement Shamen rocking it up in the higher brackets.These types of players are infinitly more interesting to hear about. It's like the people who could kick arse as a Ret Pally pre 3.0. People who don't see a less effective spec as a subpar spec, but as a challenge to see just how much you can do with it despite the limits.These people are more interesting than the sheep that would play in a popular setup like Rogue/Mage/Priest
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.