Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-13-2009 @ 8:23AM
Axolotl said...
Well, the old world achievements (like we have them now) would be in there, and most feats of strength we (don't) have now, would be achievements to be gotten.
Getting that first mount (or plainsrunning) at 40 and the epic one at 60 would be a REAL achievement, warlocks and paladins would have an easier time getting a group for their epic mount quests.
Nowadays, finding a group to do the quest is an achievement on itself.
All old-world-bosses could have achievements tied to them in how you take them out (like Arugal with nobody over 20 in the group or something)
Reply
5-13-2009 @ 2:20PM
Rai said...
If there was an achievement to kill him with no-one in the group over 20, and you dinged 20 and missed it, the achievement becomes impossible to ever accomplish on that character.
That's bad mojo.