Skip to Content
5-21-2009 @ 4:09PM
as fun as this might sound, the reality of blizzard implementing even more burst into the ret paladin bag of tricks is very very unlikely, especially when you consider that next to all pvp'ers in the wow community agree that ret pallys need a little mellowing out in that area. the trainable SoB at 20 sounds great though.
5-21-2009 @ 8:48PM
Again, this is why they should use the GuildWars philosophy-- Make a PVP version and a PVE version. Simply make a "Player" creature type that allows spells to deal damage / proc different. Simple and elegant it balances BG's, Arenas, and World-PVP-- All without nerfing PVE play into the ground. Why Blizzard doesn't support this idea is beyond me.
5-22-2009 @ 1:19AM
@Faulken S Wulf For the simple reason that they don't want their to be two completely different ways to play your class. WoW is a mass market MMo and most players already struggle with the idea of two different specs for PVP, let alone two different play styles with the same spec.And to be honest it is a cop out.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.