Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-21-2009 @ 4:09PM
nufemasta said...
as fun as this might sound, the reality of blizzard implementing even more burst into the ret paladin bag of tricks is very very unlikely, especially when you consider that next to all pvp'ers in the wow community agree that ret pallys need a little mellowing out in that area.
the trainable SoB at 20 sounds great though.
Reply
5-21-2009 @ 8:48PM
Faulken S Wulf said...
Again, this is why they should use the GuildWars philosophy-- Make a PVP version and a PVE version. Simply make a "Player" creature type that allows spells to deal damage / proc different. Simple and elegant it balances BG's, Arenas, and World-PVP-- All without nerfing PVE play into the ground. Why Blizzard doesn't support this idea is beyond me.
5-22-2009 @ 1:19AM
theRaptor said...
@Faulken S Wulf
For the simple reason that they don't want their to be two completely different ways to play your class. WoW is a mass market MMo and most players already struggle with the idea of two different specs for PVP, let alone two different play styles with the same spec.
And to be honest it is a cop out.