The Colosseum: Caylie the Priest
The Colosseum takes us inside the world of the Gladiator (Brutal, Vengeful, Merciless, and otherwise), to interview some of the top Arena fighters in the battlegroups. Our goal is to bring a better understanding of the strategy, makeup, and work that goes into dueling it out for fame, fortune, and Netherdrakes.Caylie is the Priest in a Priest/Warlock or Priest/Rogue team, "Esport Ballers." Currently sitting at 12th place for their battlegroup, the team has traditionally done well in previous seasons.
The player prefers to go by Cayley, due to his character names back in previous seasons. Despite having other options, he says he prefers the Warlock/Priest team for the sake of a challenge.
Check out what else Caylie had to say behind the cut.
WoW Insider: I guess my first question might be obvious. Which class do you play?
Cayley: Priest, but sometimes a Paladin.
Wow Insider: What role do you play as a Priest? What made you choose this class?
Cayley: The name of my character is Caylie, but I'm more known under Cayley from when I played on Tichondrius during Season 2 and Season 3. I transferred off that server sometime around then.
As a priest, I always play Discipline because I could never stand Shadow for more than 5 minutes. (Unless, of course, I'm just messing around.)
It was actually a spur of the moment decision to play a priest. I played a rogue when Burning Crusades came out, and we just couldn't find a decent priest for any bracket. (We were mainly looking for someone in 5v5.)
It was originally a joke, me making the priest and getting a few levels on it. But, I then started to have a little fun. Next thing I knew, I was level 70 and wanted to play the character.
Whenever I'm playing the Arena, I prefer to play with the Warlock Kigz. We usually play underpowered compositions, due to the fact that they are probably more fun. We've played Priest/Warlock now for every season and we've made Gladiator every time. (But, we've not gotten much higher than that due to the obvious reasons.)
WoW Insider: What's the experience like, as a pair of casters in the Arena? How do you make it work against the melee classes?
Cayley: Me and Kigz have been playing Priest/Warlock for every season since Season 1. The whole composition revolves around what I think of as exploiting the other team's weaknesses and mistakes.
Most of the time, I feel like the other team underestimates us, or we win the match due to a fluke. Although our composition does suck, it's really easy to lose to us if you're not careful. In Season 5, we played up to 3rd place on our Battlegroup somehow, beating out a lot of the Death Knight/Paladin teams. The DK/Paladin fights are very hard to win if the DK is good.
The DK can single-handedly put out enough pressure to both the Warlock and his pet that I can't drink at all. These fights are usually long, around 10 minutes or more, and last until we eventually get a kill on the Paladin.
However, that was with the old Divine Hymn stun, and winning that way is no longer easy. The hardest team to beat used to be anything with a Rogue but I can't say for certain what it will be in Season 6.
WoW Insider: Rogues can easily plague any caster that's not a Mage. How do you counter Rogues?
Cayley: Hmm, it's not really "countering" a Rogue, I'd say. It's more like dragging the fight out until he does something stupid enough where we kill him.
In fights suck as Rogue/Druid, the match could literally go on for maybe 30+ minutes because the whole fight would consist of me heal-drinking while my Warlock tanks.
However, the true weakness of Priest/Warlock is when our opponents attack the priest first. It's more dangerous to leave the Warlock open, but it could be a faster win for them if they have a Rogue, Death Knight, or Warrior. Death Knights may be the dumbest when they train on the priest, because of Anti-Magic Shield and Lichborne. These powers greatly counter a Warlock, especially when the DK misses his mindfreeze.
Basically, any team with a Rogue will always come out on top unless they mess up somewhere huge. For example, if they have problems with over-extension or Line of Sight.
The type of game play which was involved with heal-drinking is practically gone now, considering the nerf to spirit. That was an important part of this composition. In fact, the whole game now is to just to kill someone in 20 seconds.
WoW Insider: A lot has been made of Retribution Paladin's burst damage, and how it plays into the fast-kill dynamic you're talking about. What's your opinion on the state of Retribution Paladins right now?
Cayley: Ret paladins and every melee class are too easy to play.
Now that I think more about it, if you were to nerf Ret Paladins it would be pointless. If you nerfed their damage output, the PvE community would be in an uproar. It would cause them to buff something else to possibly make them better than they are currently, or make them wose. That would add more crying to the Paladin community, claiming to be underpowered.
WoW Insider: How do you rate the different melee classes? Admittedly, you're in a little bit of a unique position in terms of caster classes. While many talk about "gap closers," Priests don't have a "gap creater."
Cayeley: Interesting question, actually. That's something I have a strong opinion about when it comes to having mobility on a priest.
The thing about Priests is that they can't move when they have a snare on them. Every melee class has a reliable snare on a Priest, which will keep the priest in grasp for quite some time.
I like the concept of having to sit here and tank the damage. Of course, it can be quite frustrating because of the fact that I have to stand there, but I think it WAS a good thing. The best part about having to tank a melee was the fact that I could have my Warlock peel me while I ran away behind a pole to drink. By the time the melee got back to me, the mana I lost tanking him was regained. This was a huge advantage that spirit brought to the table and now it's no longer available.
If I had to fear one melee the most it would be warrior. Just because our composition has two classes that only has Fears as their peels, it's pretty difficult to kite Warriors effectively.
WoW Insider: Do you think this is going to be the season Warrior/Druid teams make their big comeback? Ghostcrawler has already alluded to the return of Warriors as a force in the Arena.
Cayley: I think pretty low of Ghostcrawler, but Warriors are definitely making a comeback. There have been warriors that have struggled in killing me and then I've seen others that put out so much damage that it's just dumb.
I think if a player can play a Warrior to its optimum level, the class is very strong. The Warrior and Druid teams should be making a comeback seeing that it's impossible to kill a druid now. He only has to sit in tree form and spam heals on himself.
However I'd think it would be pretty boring because I'd much rather see cyclones/roots being thrown around.
WoW Insider: Okay, what about Enhancement Shamans, Boomkins, or Shadow Priests. Do you see those guys in the Arena on your battlegroup at all? Why not, do you think?
Cayley: Enhancement Shamans, Boomkins, and Shadow priests are all very under-represented. I don't think there's much Blizzard can do at this point to balance out everything without them messing something up in PvE or some other aspect of PvP.
However, I think it's pointless to try and buff a class like Enhancement Shaman because it's just about as easy as a Ret Paladin. No one plays them anyway.
WoW Insider: So, do you usually come out swinging, or stay kind of defensive until you know what you're fighting?
Cayley: Usually, what ends up happening, is that I end up playing like it's WoTLK and try to kill someone in the start of the match. I'll help DPS and get my dispels off, but as the fight goes on, I'll drink a lot. If I see the fight going nowhere I'll try to get enough mana back to put us ahead by doing more DPS and playing very offensive.
WoW Insider: Are there changes that you're hopeful to see in the Arena?
Cayley: Yeah, there are a few changes I'd like to see, but I doubt they would ever take them into any consideration. If anything, I'd probably want them to remove the Death Knight class. But that won't happen so the least they can do is make their pet not be as good as it is. Compared to a Hunter and Warlock pet, the DK pet is pretty ridiculous as to how many they can have per match.
I also saw Kigz get Frost Striked the other day for 7.5k and he's wearing near 1050 resilience. That is pretty stupid. RNG is pretty stupid too, but what can you do about it.
WoW Insider: Do you (or your partner) use any PvE gear in your kits? Do you use PvE to supplement your PvP, or is it totally separate?
Cayley: I wish I could stand PvE for a minute. It's probably the most boring part of this game after you fight the boss one time. Neither of us use PvE gear. However, we used to be part of the raiding guild "PvE is Hard" on Tichondrius. That and before BC were the only times I ever even had fun raiding. So, we don't really do it anymore.
WoW Insider: What would you recommend for a new Arena player?
Cayley: To all new players, I'd suggest they pick a DK and post on the WoW forums to cry about your PvP misfortunes. Also click every button and keyboard turn.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, The Colosseum






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
nitsu May 24th 2009 6:09PM
Nice interview man. He gave nice detailed answers.
Max May 25th 2009 3:10AM
1: good interview. I like the actual specific questions and interesting comp.
2: this guy said pretty much everything I have been thinking about arena since wrath, and just about what every serious arena player has also been thinking. Melee damage is out of control, DKs have too much utility to do the ridiculous burst that they do.
He definitely came across as bitter, but everything he said was 100% true.
Brien May 24th 2009 6:18PM
Wow, what a bitter and pathetic player. Almost nothing constructive to say whatsoever, just crying and complaining.
Questions were fine, the responses were mostly terrible.
Sean May 24th 2009 6:37PM
I quite agree. While this is the direction I'd like to see The Colosseum go - highlighting underrepresented comps/classes and exploring how they cope in the current arena environment - the interviewee seems to play the game out of spite.
The interviewee's responses also beg the question: why run this interview at all? What would the reader glean from this besides the ranting of a jaded player? I play a warlock, I'd like to get into arena, but all I walk away from this interview with is QQ about arena burst damage and Death Knights.
Aeternal May 24th 2009 6:37PM
What could they say that wouldn't come off as lying, bragging or QQ?
soul May 24th 2009 6:38PM
Let me guess, dk or retadin?
Gothia May 25th 2009 2:59AM
Until you play Arena as a clothie then you have no place to talk. You are basically competing against a class vice a player. The player is not as skilled as you are, but you lose because the class puts out so much damage or abilities that counter your #1 ability casting spells. DK and Ret damage is insane and he is right matches average 20-30 seconds for a decision. Decisions are based not on when both players die, it only take 1 member of a team to go down and the match is pretty much a wrap unless you get extremely lucky. Every single thing he said is absolutely true and you can take his tone as bitter, but until you walk in a clothies shoes you don't know the whole story. Also for the guys that thing they are so good I suggest you try to play arena as a clothie. I bet you won't last a week.
phlipy May 25th 2009 3:17AM
Nothing to blame the interviewer for but indeed at least some information and less complaining would have been interesting. A pity 'The Colosseum' was missused almost entirely as a platform for QQ.
Onnaug May 24th 2009 6:19PM
haha, quality interview right here.
lamporium May 24th 2009 6:43PM
Cayley may have been a complainer, but Cayley must really know PvP and the classes to do so well with such a really bad comp. If I was Blizz, I'd take more PvP tweaking suggestions from obviously great players such as Cayley, then the masses in general.
In a perfect world, Arenas would be about bringing the player and not the class/spec. Unfortunately, for the game to get to that point, it would be have to be an entirely different game, but until then it's nice to see great players doing well with bad comps.
Magresda May 24th 2009 7:13PM
I have yet to see an interview like this where the interviewee actually says something interesting, and not just QQ about how much other classes are OP, yet he kills them because he has skills and plays a difficult class. While I don't doubt his ability to perform well in PvP, he comes across as a giant douche interested in nothing but himself and his ego. Good interview though.
knid May 24th 2009 7:20PM
Good interview? He spent most of his time talking about his underpowered comp and yet played 90% of his matches this season with a rogue. He may be very, very good but he's not defying the odds by playing with a warlock partner.
Magresda May 25th 2009 5:38AM
Sorry, I meant "Good interview" more as "Good questions". I thought I made it clear that I didn't particularly like the guy.
Bouillestfu May 24th 2009 7:17PM
WoW this was the biggest QQ interview ever. This is dumb, this is OP, Blizz never listens. It's like he's 13...
AMS May 24th 2009 7:17PM
This person is one of many reasons why the WoW community sucks. I guess if you're into "e-friends" and being "e-cool" then its a good interview.
Naughton May 24th 2009 7:25PM
As much as i would LOVE to give this guy some credit for playing an underpowered comp such as Disc/Lock. You guys should prolly go ahead and check the guys 2s team and see that on 8% of hes damn games were played with the lock, the other 370 for gods sakes was played with a rogue. I also think you guys should all kno just exactly how bad the Stormstrike Battlegroup is.
So no, i have no respect for a priest that has to xfer off of BG9 in order to keep their Glad title.
Keleron May 24th 2009 7:54PM
I play Warlock/Priest for 2s so was really into this interview. He is right.. anytime there is a rogue against us, it almost always turns out the same:( We had 24battles yesterday and 13 of them had rogues in them... we took a huge drop in points. I wish he had gone into a bit more detail about their play strategy. THat would have been very helpful.
TehBomo May 24th 2009 8:05PM
So... do we get to hear a high-rated arena hunter interviewed? :) :)???
......
;)
damon.kf90 May 24th 2009 8:58PM
He QQ's... THIS is what you get for asking for a non-DK or Pally interview (and, yes, I do play a Pally and I'm loving the OP... I bask in your failed attempts)
Land May 24th 2009 9:22PM
Ok first off, comparing ANY comp to a DK/paly one is retarded. It's equivalent to gloating that a Porsche is better then a Corvette.Everyone knows the Porsche requires less skill the go faster, unlike a corvette where you have to tinker and know the ins and outs to unlock it's full potential.
Secondly, @ Damon.fk90 you a fucking retard and noob. "i love being OP" All that means is you don't have the skill to play another class and have to take advantage of the unbalanced classes to get anywhere.