Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-09-2009 @ 1:04PM
Bubsa said...
"I can't think of any PvE-oriented specs that are actually failing in PvP."
Well, depending how you would define 'fail', I'd say a Holy Priest is nearing this category :P
Reply
6-09-2009 @ 1:16PM
JKWood said...
I haven't been particularly successful with my Holy Pally in PvP. I suppose now that I have Holy Shock, I should give it another try, though.
6-09-2009 @ 1:29PM
Alex Ziebart said...
That was a typo. :\
It was supposed to say, "I can't think of any PvE-oriented specs that are actually failing in PvE."
Meaning I think all specs are doing fairly well. At least, much much better than they used to be.
6-09-2009 @ 1:58PM
Bubsa said...
Ah. Like every single druid having to be resto in Vanilla WoW.
Gotcha!
6-09-2009 @ 2:20PM
Dart said...
Fire Mage?
6-09-2009 @ 2:31PM
Worcester said...
Don't forget that deep-Sub rogues still have Honor Among Thieves. Personally, I pick up Shadowstep too. It costs a few extra points, but it also delivers a damage bonus and threat reduction each time it's used. Not bad in a boss fight.
My gear is significantly lower than most other rogues I run into in raids, but my DPS is usually not too far behind.
6-09-2009 @ 2:33PM
Mattimus said...
"Ah. Like every single druid having to be resto in Vanilla WoW."
And Paladins having to go Holy and look at nothing except the 5-minute timers on 40 people, warriors being THE only tank... I'm so glad that we've taken such huge steps away from class pigeonholing.
6-09-2009 @ 4:54PM
Riley said...
I tried HAT once, didn't really like it
other than the time i tried it, I don't think I've ever seen a raiding sub rogue