Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-18-2009 @ 2:59PM
thebvp said...
Good luck actually getting into a game, though.
I doubt the separate battlegrounds feature will actually make it to live if they consider what it will do to queue times. Queue times in the higher brackets are especially bad and I don't foresee turning off experience on my 50-59 paladin unless I want to, say, just get a few quest items, then immediately switch back.
Except maybe in 10-19, I really don't think there's enough of a player base to support dividing between the twinks and nontwinks.
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 3:03PM
thebvp said...
And not to mention, at 10-19, it would pretty much just be a WSG with 17 rogues and 3 hunters game after game- not exactly an exciting or varied player experience.
6-18-2009 @ 3:47PM
Irshalthra said...
I have twinks 19 & 29 and love the idea of competing with other twinks. However I do worry about the que times also. Currently the 29 Que times bite - separating these will make it worse. 19 ques are very reasonable usually - I hope this does not mess these up.
My biggest problem has always been premades - whether twink premades or nontwinks they have an unfair advantage. I always hoped the change would start here by putting premades against premades.
6-18-2009 @ 4:51PM
Yeng said...
Except now they have the ability to make battlegrounds cross-server/battlegroups. They could do this to the twink BGs to cut the queue down.