Skip to Content
6-25-2009 @ 11:15AM
Im really looking forward patch 3.2. Not just im a casual now, but the shaman changes makes me excited too.and yes the mount at lvl 20 are real goodies :)
6-25-2009 @ 11:51AM
Why did this guy get voted down?There are a lot of idiots who read this blog, huh?
6-25-2009 @ 11:54AM
He got voted down for having the word First in his comment. I edited it out, because the rest of his comment is valid.Let that be a lesson to the rest of you. Readers don't like it when you say "First", even if you have something good to say afterward.
6-25-2009 @ 12:12PM
@Robin TorresUmm maybe you should read the comment. No where does Naku have the word 'First' in his post. His post is "Im really looking forward patch 3.2. Not just im a casual now, but the shaman changes makes me excited too.and yes the mount at lvl 20 are real goodies :)"So why was he voted down again?
6-25-2009 @ 12:18PM
Maybe you should read Robin's comment again where she said she edited out the first...I had a debate about this with a super hardcore player who was thinking of quitting wow because of the emblem system. Casuals are never going to reach the gear that hardcore people will have. If it takes 2 months for casuals to get one piece of gear, 4 months for the next one, then blizzard will be releasing a new patch and it all starts again.People need to chill. We don't play as much time as the hardcore, but we invest time in WoW nonetheless. We should be rewarded as well for the effort we put into the game...
Maybe you should read Robin's post.. "i edited it out".
6-25-2009 @ 12:21PM
@WolftechAnd if you would read Robin's comment she says she edited it out but left the rest there. "The rest" is what you are reading and that's why you do not see "first".
6-25-2009 @ 12:22PM
"So why was he voted down again?"Because you didn't read all of Robin's response."He got voted down for having the word First in his comment. [emphasis mine] I EDITED IT OUT, because the rest of his comment is valid."
6-25-2009 @ 12:23PM
Can we stop talking about this now? Let's talk about bunnies! I think that gnomes should have bunny mounts. Discuss.
6-25-2009 @ 12:25PM
hmm...ok understood/saluteIm not sure why is so bad saying that, but if you dont like it than I apologize.
6-25-2009 @ 12:30PM
No, I didn't read all of that post so I missed that part where Robin Torres edited the comment and of that I am guilty. But what right does anyone have to censor someones comments that are not derogatory or hateful? What gives you the right to remove stuff like 'First'. Let the world see they are and idiot, and not be the gestapo and censer everything. Whats next, someone disagree with you and you delete their post? Last time I checked this IS America and we have the right to free speech, even if it to post 'First' at the beginning of their comments.
6-25-2009 @ 12:35PM
America? This Is The Internet!
6-25-2009 @ 12:37PM
@wolftechWe are not the government. The first ammendment does not apply here. Private sites can control the content displayed.I edited the word First out to be nice to Naku, because I felt that the rest of his comment deserved to be judged by itself.Are bunnies too big? Should gnomes have hamster mounts instead?
6-25-2009 @ 12:41PM
Yes...this is America. Which stops the GOVERNMENT from editing blog posts. (Which, by the way, isn't what happened here, you may have noticed.) Fortunately, this being America also protects the property rights of blog owners who want to avoid an entire page of comments about the word "first."But I do agree with one thing. Why not let everyone continue to see how stupid the idiots are. So, let's start a petition: Robin...please leave Wolftech's comments alone.By the way...I would absolutely kill for a bunny mount.
they should have ferret mounts. It is the perfect solution. Not only can they ride them, gnomes can also use ferret burrows for sleep quarters. :-P
6-25-2009 @ 12:43PM
In America, and especially on the Internet, we also have the right to flame any idiot who says first in their post (that includes any idiot trying to defend it and say that we censor everything). Lets be honest, the internet is one of the most uncensored sources of information out there, don't take it personally we just dislike the word first in people's posts. Oh, and welcome to Wowinsider.Douche.PS: I'm pretty sure the writer of the article has the right to remove whatever comment he or she wants. Especially when the comment pertains to his or her own article.
6-25-2009 @ 12:59PM
JUST PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DONT MAKE THEN MECHANICAL BUNNIES.I hate all the sounds the mech chicken makes. They are such bad mounts that I grinded (ground?) the rep for an elekk.Anyone willing to help me petition the removal of noisey clunky mech chicken mounts? Maybe replace them with Dun Morough bunnies?
6-25-2009 @ 1:27PM
@WolftechGet a brain morans! Go USA!
6-25-2009 @ 1:32PM
Gnomes should NOT have bunny mounts.But gnome Engineers CONSTRUCTING mechanical bunny mounts, now that is another thing altogether...PS - Next time just delete the "first" post and ban the poster. It's easy and effective, and entirely avoids the discussion of gnomes and bunnies.
6-25-2009 @ 5:08PM
@Robin:I agree. Bunny mounts all the way. My mage wants a bunny mount.@ImpureZero:Good plan. We don't have nearly enough mounts that you actually have to kill things to get. It's "PvP this, and buy that, and fish there." I vote that Gnomes can earn a bunny mount by soloing elite Hogger.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.