Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-29-2009 @ 6:49PM
Fung said...
"feedback threads going to good use" my damn ass.
the old values were obvious placeholders, and i consider this the first, not the second run at t9 bonuses.
warlock t7 2setbonus: "Increases the damage done by your Unstable Affliction by 20% and your Immolate by 10%."
warlock t9 4setbonus: "Increases the damage done by your Immolate, Corruption, and Unstable Affliction spells by 10%."
two whole tiers of progression, 4set vs 2set... just delete the damn class already.
Reply
6-29-2009 @ 6:51PM
Michael Sacco said...
If you're so convinced that the first pass was placeholders, then why aren't you convinced that these warlock set bonuses, identical to the first pass, are also placeholders?
Siberian ginseng and some valerian root is my recommendation.
6-29-2009 @ 7:04PM
Fung said...
you know, you're right. my memory was wrong, and I was thinking it was the 4setbonus that was the illogical "Increases your pet's critical strike chance with its abilities by 10%. (0 yd, cast: 0 seconds, val1: 10)", the one that really told me it's just placeholders. i see now that that was the two-set, and you're right: nothing's changed since the last announcement for locks, and yeah, i probably can still regard these as just placeholders.
i just presumed when the article was about CHANGES to tier 9, that the only thing mentioned about warlocks would be, well, a change.
it'd be super-lame as is, but i withdraw my outrage until further notice ^_^
6-29-2009 @ 7:12PM
Fung said...
yeaahhh, ok, i can see the 4set changed just marginally too.
soooo since i'm on a roll, i need to think up an error for THIS post than i can correct in yet another too.