Skip to Content
7-02-2009 @ 1:53PM
I have to agree about DP. I don't understand what could possibly make GC think that the proposed change would be viewed as anything other than a buff.
7-02-2009 @ 4:40PM
In fact... they may be able to fix two problems at once by removing the hard lockout on DvP. It does some pretty weak up-front damage... but it does pretty weak up-front damage, and without a hard lockout it would be spammable since it's instant cast. Shadowpriests need a situational spammable weak nuke? Hrm... I wonder where that would come from? It is also a expensive spell to cast, so that would also limit you standing there and just spamming DvP all day, but I think a no-CD DvP would not only make the spell much more useful as a DoT, but also fill a niche of a spammable direct-damage nuke.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.