Tom Chilton talks about 3.2 and the future of World of Warcraft
Videogamer.com has a nice long interview with World of Warcraft Producer Tom Chilton about everything from patch 3.2 and the Argent Tournament to the future of the game at large. They caught up with him at the Warcraft Regional Finals 2009 tournament in Germany this past week, and in part one, he talks about the upcoming patch and what Blizzard is expecting to get out of it. He says the Isle of Conquest battleground is their most "epic-feeling" instanced PvP setting since Alterac Valley, and that they want it to feel nuts, with players fighting each other via air and land. He also mentions Arena, and says that it was originally designed to be "a fun side PvP activity" that they went a little overboard with during Burning Crusade. Finally, he talks about twinks, and says that neither Blizzard nor twinks, apparently, want to see other players crushed by those who have the time or money to max out their low level characters. Even twinks, says Chilton, want to see competition against each other, and the option to turn XP off will let them do that. I'm not sure I agree with that last one -- many twinks seem to beef their characters up just for the chance to lay waste to "normal" players, but Chilton says Blizzard believes otherwise.The second part of the interview is more general -- he talks a little bit about the next expansion (with the same speculation we've already heard: Gilneas, the Maelstrom, the Emerald Dream), and says that designing a race is tougher on artists, but designing a class is tougher on designers. He admits that because we had a new class in Wrath, it's unlikely we'll see another class so soon in the next expansion, but "not impossible" of course. And he does note that Blizzard tries to "pre-seed" the races before they use them as playable races, so if they are adding in races, chances are we've already seen them (which, you may note, wasn't strictly true with the Draenei in BC). Finally, he talks about the future of Blizzard's MMO in general, and says it's still wide open to them: they plan for the game to last for years, and what they do between now and then, whether that be more expansions, microtransactions, or even a free-to-play model, will have to depend on what they want to do at the time.
Very interesting interview. Chilton doesn't really reveal anything, but you do get the sense that save for a very skeleton plan of one or two years in the future, Blizzard is really playing it fast and loose with World of Warcraft. Even he admits that the game may look very different, depending on how things go, in another four years from now.
Filed under: Patches, Wrath of the Lich King, The Burning Crusade, Raiding, Expansions, Instances, News items, Blizzard, Odds and ends, Events, Analysis / Opinion, Battlegrounds






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Nick S Jul 6th 2009 8:11PM
Arenas: a fun side PvP activity? Wow, they *really* got carried away, since Arenas ended up being the end-game of PvP.
As for the xpac, I rather hope they go with a new race. Classes change a lot at each expansion anyway, and introducing a new one will just give Blizz a chance to repeat the mistakes they made with Death Knights.
Keleron Jul 6th 2009 9:41PM
I was laughed when I read that too. I pray that they take a step back and fix that. Right now, BGs are the fun part of PvP and arena is where ppl go for gear and glory. It really should be the other way around.
Please Blizzard fix this!! Stop offering the best gear to Arena players and offer us BG lovers the better PvP gear. With AV being 40 ally to 23 Horde everytime I play, I need the gear more;) lol
Nick S Jul 6th 2009 10:30PM
I think rated BGs could be really fun, but it'd probably have to be a guild thing to work. Imagine guild WSGs against other guilds - wouldn't that be amazing? And more fun than praying you get matched against the right comp so you can win your Arena match?
It'll happen when BGs give top-end gear, I suppose.
Keleron Jul 7th 2009 2:35AM
Yeah that would be awesome and probably really add a much need catalyst to get players into PvP again.
I would be fine with the old BG system.. 10 AB marks, 30WSG marks.. whatever.. for gear. Sure some will argue that they hate doing certain bgs, but you could alliviate that by maybe giving a standard BG mark instead.. make all gear purchasable with honor and marks.. 70marks for chest, 30marks for hands.. something like that. THis way if you want to run nothing by AV all the time, you can. YOu can enjoy the game, play the type of PvP you want and get good rewards.
Make Arena points tradable for marks as well, so this way BGs and Arena are on the same level.
As for end of season rewards.. well Im fine with that staying, since a sport does tend to have reward. I don't care about that. But they need to show us BGers some love. This new BG they are making is all fine and dandy, but if they don't give us some incentive it will die down real fast. To the point were is like AV.. horribly outnumbered and dead sometimes.
havitech Jul 7th 2009 8:26AM
I think that bit is little more than PR bullshit.
They've been shoving arena down our throats since BC, and they're only now listening to the playerbase. I do wonder why they chose to back-peddle now. Maybe Activision told them to stop pouring so many resources into a pet project that only a minority of players enjoyed? That would be *so* ironic.
Whatever prompted them to refocus on BGs, I'm thankful for it. But I don't believe for a second that the developers accidentally let arena grow into the monster that it is now.
*still bitter about frostwyrms*
K. Y. Jelly Jul 6th 2009 8:12PM
Panderan as the new race of wow plez make it sooooo
Eternauta Jul 6th 2009 8:48PM
The next person to ask for playable Pandaren will die from cronic Diarrhea.
jbodar Jul 6th 2009 11:08PM
@Eternauta
Is that a promise? No seriously, we need to make this happen!
Anaughtybear Jul 7th 2009 6:10AM
It won't be diarrhea. It will be me, beating them to death with their own tard helmets.
Clevins Jul 6th 2009 8:17PM
There were draenei in Forest Song pre-BC...
Eric Jul 6th 2009 9:34PM
And the original Draenei, first seen in WC3 which they turned in to the Broken for WoW, were in Swamp of Sorrows.
Sothe Jul 6th 2009 10:41PM
Actually that place used to be completely dead other than one NPC.
Naveed Jul 7th 2009 12:06AM
Ummm, nope, that place was updated WAY after BC. There wasn't a flight path there or anything.
clevins Jul 7th 2009 1:42AM
No, it was updated with the 2.0 patch. TBC had a major version patch just as Wrath did. Never said it had a FP at the time.
Andelorn Jul 7th 2009 6:15AM
Incorrect, the change to Forest Song came with 2.0, the patch preceding Burning Crusade. The Draenei also appeared around the rest of the game, in major cities and a few old places like Hinterlands.
my2cents Jul 8th 2009 5:15AM
I think Mike's summary of the interview was a little confusing regarding the issue of pre-seeding races. Chilton didn't say that they always do that or that they always have, but rather that they plan on doing that *from now on* specifically because they learned from their mistake with having Draenei just sort of appear out of nowhere. He goes on to say that despite the presence of Broken and the fact that Draenei had been referred to in previous WC games, the Draenei themselves had never been seen and so it was a bit weird to have them just pop into the game with a patch.
Also, another notable thing in the interview is that when the interviewer asks if it would be necessary to set the next expansion somewhere other than Azeroth, Chilton not only says that wouldn't be necessary, but he goes on to say "There are parts of Eastern Kingdoms and Azeroth that haven't been filled out yet. Out there in the South Seas there are islands, there's out where the Maelstrom is. There's still quite a bit of land mass. We keep referring to the Emerald Dream, which is maybe not exactly in Azeroth, but is sort of tied to it in some way or another." Seems quite telling that those are the examples he gives, particularly when he knows how much speculation there's already been about the next expansion being related to the Emerald Dream and/or Maelstrom. Hmmm...
ElroyJetson Jul 6th 2009 8:19PM
Please let it be Consortium.
Nick S Jul 6th 2009 8:22PM
That'd be pretty cool, and could work with the Maelstrom. Trade war with the Goblins, perhaps?
Better than Pandaren, anyway.
Atsuko Jul 6th 2009 8:43PM
Consortium would be okay I guess, provided its not cross faction. I'd much prefer to have two seperate new races, one each faction, than a single cross faction one, cause that would probably mess things up bigtime.
Irem Jul 7th 2009 7:36AM
I could die happy if they made Ethereals playable, especially as part of some kind of third neutral faction. They always seemed to me as though they were someone's pet project; for a race of energy beings that came out of nowhere as an excuse for quest hubs, they had a ton of backstory and ingame flavor. I think we actually got more information on them than some of the stuff that's directly impacted the storyline of either expansion.