Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-07-2009 @ 5:12PM
Thecla said...
I can't believe the amount of seemingly five year old players that are now crying for slimes/hydras/ghost wolves to be taken away.
So many posts on the official forums that basically say nothing but "Wahhhh! I can't have MY special pet so no one else should have theirs!!"
Are people really that childish and tacky?
Reply
7-07-2009 @ 10:26PM
MinatorBearCat said...
Yes
7-07-2009 @ 5:17PM
Eric said...
Yes.
7-07-2009 @ 5:34PM
jjcoola998 said...
Are you really surprised?
7-07-2009 @ 5:54PM
Jack Spicer said...
New Flash! Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc!
Blizzard didn't remove the pet because people were complaining that they couldn't tame the pet. They removed it because they never intended hunters to have Worgens as pets. If they did, trust us, we would have heard about it.
7-07-2009 @ 7:30PM
Warren said...
I wouldn't call it childish and tacky. I want Blizzard to be consistent. IF you (Blizz) don't want the Ghost wolf to be a pet make it untamable and then remove the ones that people have.
If you don't want the slims/hydras to be tamed then remove the ones that have them also.
That being said I think everyone should be able to keep what they have. I have the Sapphire Hive Queens as a pet. You can't tame her no more.
http://www.wowhead.com/?npc=28087
7-08-2009 @ 7:11AM
Sinthar said...
@ Warren
Id like YOU to be consistant.
"IF you (Blizz) don't want the Ghost wolf to be a pet make it untamable and then remove the ones that people have."
Followed by
"That being said I think everyone should be able to keep what they have. I have the Sapphire Hive Queens as a pet. You can't tame her no more."
Just doesnt seem consistant to me. You want blizz to make it untamable and remove the tamed ones, but leave your (now) untamable pet with you.
I dont think you have any right to call for others to be consistant until you can write 3 lines without contradicting yourself.
7-08-2009 @ 10:42AM
traptinacivicsi said...
Warren said what he meant correctly.
He's asking for BLIZZARD to be consistent with what they do with misc. hunter pets. Remove the chance to tame and revoke all pets already tamed, or remove the chance BUT leave the pets.
He then said that he wished they WOULD allow us to keep them, which doesn't change the fact he wants them to have one procedure when dealing with exotic misc. pets.