The Colosseum: Comotu of Executus
The Colosseum takes us inside the world of the Gladiator (Brutal, Vengeful, Merciless, Furious, and otherwise), to interview some of the top Arena fighters in the battlegroups. Our goal is to bring a better understanding of the strategy, makeup, and work that goes into dueling it out for fame, fortune, and Netherdrakes. We're especially focused on the people who play these games, to further shed light on the world of the PvP player.Comotu is the Paladin in the 5v5 team "ROFL My Copter," the 3v3 team "RMP," and the 2v2 team "COMOFOLD." While developing his skills since Season 2, Comotu has had the opportunity to work with several players. Even more importantly, he's preparing himself and his team to excel in future seasons.
Comotu spent some time with The Colosseum, talking about how he came about playing a Paladin, how his teams got together, and what kind of dynamics he experiences in current matches. Check out what he had to say behind the cut.
WoW Insider: Which class do you play? What made you choose to play that class?
Comotu: I currently play a Dwarf Paladin. There's actually a funny story to why I play the class.
I started my World of Warcraft adventures as a cunning Gnome Warrior. However, during the summer, I decided to let my glorious level 58 character rest while I took some classes. But there was little to do during that summer. Luckily, my father had joined me in the adventure of beginning to play World of Warcraft as a Dwarf Paladin! Seeing as I had the extra time and access to my father's account, I figured I'd use it.
I began to like the class very much. It was like a Warrior on steroids (since I was never starved for rage). Eventually the character evolved into something much more complex than what my father enjoyed. (He preferred a simple, low-level character for questing.) And I guess you could say I "inherited" the account.
To this day, I still play my beloved paladin and on occasions bring out my Mage or my girlfriend's Moonkin. I could go on about what has kept me playing the paladin through thick (Season 4 and Season 5) and thin (Season 2 and Season 3) but I will leave that for a later occasion since I've already answered the question at hand.
WoW Insider: Wow -- that's one hell of a story. Who's your partner(s) for the Arena? How did you get hooked up together?
Comotu: I currently play in 2v2 with a Death Knight named Eisengrahf.
At the end of Burning Crusade, with the release of Sunwell, I became tired of raiding and decided to focus a bit more on PvP. Thank god I did, because if I hadn't gotten those Alterac Valley achievements during Burning Crusade, I wouldn't have gotten the Battlemaster title which I proudly wear today.
Come WotLK, I found myself with no raiding guild. This presented a great challenge PvP-wise, since in the next season, everyone would be rocking full Tier 7 PvE gear, and I would be in blues since there was still no good PvP gear available.
With this in mind, I decided to join a small but strong guild named "Destruction." I felt at home there since there were a lot of foreign players such as myself. While in this guild, I met Eisengrahf. Come Season 5, though, I already had a Warrior as a partner.
Eisengrahf had talked to me previously about playing as a team since he was paired with a Mage (which sucked for him) and I was paired with a warrior (which wasn't exactly the best either). However I was as faithful to my partner as my partner was to me. We made it through Season 5.
In Season 6, still with my warrior partner, I decided to invite a "2400+" experienced Death Knight to the team to experiment. When I came to realize he was utter garbage carried by god-knows-who last season, my warrior partner got jealous and dropped the team. Needless to say, I stopped playing with the "2400+" Death Knight and found myself alone and in the cold world of PUGs.
Luckily, Eisengrahf was having trouble with his druid partner and they both wanted to move on. Once I whispered Eisen about being on my team, then and there he dropped his twos and switched over to mine. Shortly afterwards, we starting moving into the 3s bracket, and now we want to work on a 5s team. To this day we still play together.
As for my 3s and 5s team, our third for 3s is nothing less than . . .you guessed it, a Warrior. His name is Finalhero. I got to know him during my "partner elimination process" in Season 5. He didn't like temporarily sharing the team with the other warrior (mind you, it was me and two warriors frequently playing the team) while I chose who I wanted to stay with. So he left the team when he found a stable partner. He had a friend who also played a warrior but was less geared and less experienced.
Eventually, the person we like to call "the real Finalhero" stopped using said character and now "Finalhero's friend" is the owner of his account. So, technically I no longer play with "the real Finalhero" anymore but rather with "Finalhero's friend."
As for my current 5s team, I met a rather bright fellow who played a Moonkin named Beffyjunk during my journey for Battlemaster. We both raced for this achievement during Burning Crusade (needless to say, I won the race) and got to know each other since we intentionally and unintentionally played an inordinate amount of battlegrounds together.
Beffyjunk never ceased in his quest to be successful in the Arenas and eventually started talking to all the "undiscovered" PvP players on the server to form up a 5s team. We are currently the second highest on our server, if I am not mistaken, and Beffyjunk most definitely has a better place in 5s than in 3s or 2s.
WoW Insider: What are your strategies like? What do you do when the gates open?
Comotu: As far as strategies go, we all know there are an infinite amount of strategies as every strategy must be based on opportunity. I'll try and be as general as possible, since we apply the same idea to all our brackets.
As soon as the gates open, we always follow the standard procedure. Identify number of enemies (I've seen 3 players on the other side while in 2v2, and occasionally get lucky seeing less than what there should be), then identify enemy classes, and then identify enemy SPECS!!
Picking out the enemy specs is critical. We have lost matches when we see, for example, a Priest and Rogue and assume the priest is Discipline, since 95% of the time they are. And then, to our surprise, he is Shadow and we get caught off guard in a burst.
Once we have gathered the information, we need to devise a plan. It is usually centered on picking a weak target to force cooldowns to be used. Once these cooldowns (which would have made killing a target near impossible) are used up, we switch target or apply more pressure to the current target in search of a kill.
Rinse (wait for cooldowns) and repeat. That pretty much covers offense. Defense, on the other hand, is a whole different story and one which is rarely discussed. Defensive play varies widely due to this lack of discussion. Since offensive play (as stated) is discussed more, there are a lot more common ground there.
This is what works for me. When I am being hit, the instant I begin to get hit . . . I ask for my partner(s) to keep Target X off me. As a Paladin, as long as I am getting pounded, heals will be minimized. It's divided into 2 situations:
1. The target is peeled and I am free to play as I wish: I do my best to support my team by easing their way to the kill, or putting pressure on the target, as I keep them alive. (I do play Holy, if I failed to mention this earlier.)
2. The target comes back for more. We try to peel again. If multiple failures occur, I do my best to stay alive while my team can assist me, either by getting a kill or having cooldowns become available.
Again, none of my teams ever use a set strategy, the Arena simply contains too many variables to attack with a single formula. This approach (which is to say, a single formula) can be used, however it will not be as successful as a "multiple variable formula." Through the use off AddOns and perhaps the most key element to team-play, COMMUNICATION, we keep track of what the other team is doing and react accordingly.
WoW Insider: Which are your deadliest opponents right now? First, are there names in particular you dread seeing? What about classes?
Comotu: At the moment, Ret Pally / Rogue and PMR are the comps I'd say I dislike seeing the most. Since the beginning of Season 2, I've played as Holy, even when the Repentance build was about 50% of Paladin players' builds.
When the Prot/Holy build became popular, I thought it would just be another passing fad. However, I decided to try it. As soon as I did, we hit 2200 for the first time with it. Ret/Pally/Rogue is a lot of fast DPS though, and Prot/Holy is more about the long fight. So I've had trouble adjusting.
PMR on the other hand has always been the dominating 3s comp, so besides the good build, a lot of these higher rated PMR teams have a lot of experience. That's another thing that makes it dangerous, since I've only been Cleaving for about 2 weeks.
We decided to name our 3s team "PMR," it's an ironic name in a sense. It seems DK/Holy/War is the new PMR (although not quite as powerful, as demonstrated by SK vs. TSG). DK/Holy/War is finally "dethroning" what seemed to be the lifelong kind of top 3v3 compositions.
As far as names I fear seeing, I'd say Sargaz and Broseph, just because in my journey of learning in arenas, they were the top dogs the first couple of seasons I played. Those names have stayed in the back of my head. Both of them are good at what they do, and will have it no other way. My utmost respects to them.
Filed under: The Colosseum, Analysis / Opinion






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Haqien Jul 13th 2009 2:29PM
Ok....let me just say this. I continue reading "The Colosseum" in hopes that it will be something new. But, it never is...it's always a priest, a paladin, or a warlock. And what's better, you got a holy paladin(typical) in a 2v2 team with a DK(typical). Keeping with the trend that what's popular and amazing in arena is what EVERYONE obviously want to see and/or read about.
Can't you give us interviews with any of the other, less seen, classes? You know, the ones who have worked their tails off to get where they are, that aren't exactly the greatest PvP class out there. Please interview a new class.
Please.
thedpsking Jul 13th 2009 3:40PM
"Always" a warlock? Not really.
thedpsking Jul 13th 2009 3:44PM
Bleh, it cut off the rest of my comment. I was going to add that, yes, I do agree that it has been the same classes over and over again, but we've had ONE warlock.
Keleron Jul 13th 2009 7:51PM
There was only one warlock seen in a very long while on this column... and actually Warlocks are "lesser" when it comes to arena really. Warlock arena pvp is in a horrible place now. Paired with a pally/dk any caster is probably going to do ok buts most mages will be with priests and rogues, so that leaves warlocks with pally and dk. Pally/DK is very typical but I think with Arena population being so low the author is probably finding it difficult to find anyone other than these classes. Hopefully next season will be better. Or maybe blizzard will finally take focus away from arena and give the best pvp gear in BGs where they belong.
Nick S Jul 14th 2009 12:43AM
Agreed. I don't need to read about the strats these popular class/specs play; I see them in Arenas over and over!
How about a post about an Enh/Disc 2v2 from the Enh perspective? That's a rare but viable comp. Or maybe some interviews that really focus on 3v3?
Andrew R. Jul 13th 2009 2:41PM
Why do you interview so many paladins, priests and death knights? Where are all the underdogs? The hunters, warlocks, etc...?
How about an interview with someone who doesn't have a cookie cutter build but is towards the top of the board? They don't have to be in the top five of their battlegroup but they still worked hard to get where they are.
I'm sorry but I'm tired of reading about the same classes week after week.
Hanak Jul 13th 2009 2:43PM
Uhm, did I read this completely wrong, or does he play on his girlfriends acc as well as his own (or his fathers)? I know there are times when it's ok between parents and their children to share the acc. but his gf?
impurezero Jul 13th 2009 2:53PM
I see nothing wrong with a bf and gf sharing an account. I used to do the exact same thing. I played while she was at work...she played while I was at work. Recently we upgraded to having two accounts, and it's certainly more fun when you can quest together, but I see nothing wrong with two people using the same account, as long as they're ok with the drawbacks involved...
Hanak Jul 13th 2009 3:01PM
you mean apart from what it says in the Terms of Use ? ( see http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/legal/termsofuse.html )
but anyways, I truly didn't mean to start another debate about acc-sharing, so if you find nothing wrong with breaking the TOU, then I don't have any arguments. And if you do find it wrong, well, then we agree. :)
impurezero Jul 13th 2009 3:38PM
Terms of Service are almost always in place to protect the company from specific incidents. They are usually over-strict and often include sections that would imply that the company cares about things it really doesn't care about.
For example...if you read through the character naming policy, it begins to become clear that about 50% of the character names out there break the ToS in some way or another. Why aren't they being changed/suspended/etc.? Because they really don't care. The rules are in place so that when Brad Pitt's lawyers complain (random choice of celebrity), they can blame the user who "didn't follow the ToS," and avoid a lawsuit.
This is the same thing. Account Sharing "rules" are in place because they want something to fall back on when someone complains about getting hacked by a guildie after supplying them with their password to powerlevel them. Or so they can attack a gold farmer who has the account being shared by 7 employees to run it 24/7.
So, no...I really, seriously, couldn't care less if anyone uses their account along with their spouse/brother/girlfriend, etc. Quite frankly, I doubt anyone at Blizzard really cares that much either. Legalese like this is just to protect them with somebody whines.
If you do care that a family would want to save some money during economic turmoil, then more power to you, but yes...we'll have to agree to disagree.
Gramlet Jul 13th 2009 2:46PM
Recently, during the Q&A about death knights and the upcoming changes for 3.2 Ghostcrawler made an interesting comment. " It is impossible for death knights to ever run out of resources." I think this is one of the key reasons all 2v2 teams have death knights. Combined with paladin healing, bubble, utility, it is just a difficult combination to beat.
Firestyle Jul 13th 2009 3:15PM
I stomped 1-2 holy paladin blood DK teams around 1650 rating this weekend as a resto shaman/ret paladin group. It's a process of earthbind totem, windfury totem, heroism, purging all buffs, and hexing/interrupting the holy paladin. Typically, we'd kill on the second hex rotation and hold heroism until then while I healed and kited - the disease cleansing totem, earth shield, and frost shock slow DKs down a lot on shamans if you keep LoS from the death grasp.
me2hot4this Jul 14th 2009 2:53AM
I suppose the DK/Paladin just rolls over while you do that? cause when i arena, (just started), we never CC the other team, and my holy pally partner definitely never attacks the totems cause they might explode on his face. Not to mention we never go after the squishy shaman that dies in the duration of a trap. God forbid if my partner bubbles. And we never equip pvp trinkets either. Yep, we just go in there, and just go afk, definitely. Oh and we always LOS each other so i can never peeled off of him if he's in trouble. I'm not a DK, but can't the DK just silence? can't he DG the person on the paladin? chains of ice? DK pet?
Andrew R. Jul 13th 2009 2:54PM
Haqien beat me to what I was trying to say. Oh well.
Haqien Jul 13th 2009 2:58PM
Not to worry, sometimes it takes multiple tries to get through to the people at WoW.com. Heck, no matter how many times i've read comments of people saying, "No more DKs, Priest, or Pally interviews please" They still haven't changed it. I really do think this column would be better if they decided to let the other 6 classes have a chance.
Mila Jul 13th 2009 3:04PM
Out of the past 15 Coliseum articles, 9 were focused on healers and 3 were non-profiles. That leaves 3 focusing on DPS.
impurezero Jul 13th 2009 3:09PM
Good lord. This interviewee can go on and on and on answering the most innocous questions.
TL;DR version for some:
"So, how did you end up playing with this guy?"
"Well, I got tired of raiding, went to PVP, which is good because I got some achievements. Later, though, I didn't have a raiding guild, so I was sad about my gear. So I joined another guild and met a dude, which was cool, but I had a team already and so did he. But we stayed with our teams for Season 5. Later, I decided to group up with another guy in Season 6, but he sucked. Then I stopped being in his team. Also, Eisengrahf was in a crappy team of his own. He dropped his suckfest and we became an unstoppable force. But it didn't stop there. In an "interesting" turn of events we got a Warrior named Finalhero for a 3v3 team. But here's the kicker. He's not actually Finalhero anymore, he's someone else who is still Finalhero. But I digress. Remember those achivements I mentioned earlier? Wel another guy who was doing those too found me for our 5v5 team."
Looking for a "Still Too Long;Still Didn't Read" version?
"Met one guy in battlegrounds, one guy in a guild, one guy is a friend of a friend. We all like arena and now we rock."
Furlover Jul 13th 2009 4:02PM
Paladin PvP: free rating + points ftl, zero skill required!
Please feature something that isn't a pure cheese, cookie-cutter yawnfest. :-[
Nick S Jul 14th 2009 12:49AM
I assume you're thinking of Season 5. Play Holy now against, say, a team with a Druid healer.
Sarvalis Jul 13th 2009 4:06PM
Michael Gray, have you been asking Beffyjunk to do an article? Mentioned this article to him and he said someone had been asking him for a month or so about doing an article.