Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-02-2009 @ 9:32PM
Amaxe said...
Don't agree with some of the acievement swapping, such as For The Alliance/For the Horde. I took part in killing all the Horde leaders required. However I did not kill the Alliance leaders. Its different strategies, different city layouts etc. Some are easier and some are harder.
So while I understand why it was done, it's not logical.
(Yes I still think faction change should keep you the same race only you are now a traitor to your own side. I know it will never happen, but it would be cool if it did
Reply
9-03-2009 @ 12:04AM
Jay said...
"Yes I still think faction change should keep you the same race only you are now a traitor to your own side."
I think it would be cool, esp. for RP servers, but Blizzard won't do it because they've said that they like the easy visual identification for PvP purposes. It'd give a "traitor" too much of an edge in BGs and world PvP.
Probably why Alliance will never get High Elves, either, since they share models as Blood Elves.
9-03-2009 @ 1:43PM
Amaxe said...
Yeah, I know they *won't* because of these reasons, but I think it would make the game a helluva lot better... at least from a RP perspective (and I finally moved my toons to an RP server so that matters more now).
Oh well, I guess I can write more bad fanfiction showing how it could happen ;-)