Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-11-2009 @ 1:22PM
teacher said...
I'm a bit suprised that WoW.com still uses WoWiki anymore. It used to be all I used, but sometime around the end of BC, it stopped being very accurate and updated. Now it seems pretty much useless. Don't get me wrong, I would love it to be better updated, but as of right now, a site like Wowhead (specifically the comments) is a much better resource.
Reply
9-11-2009 @ 11:00PM
theRaptor said...
Then update it. It is a wiki, you are the editor. There isn't a horde of slaves out there waiting to fulfil your every whim. The only reason a lot of articles are stuck in BC is because of the huge surge in growth during BC which lead to a lot of articles being created then. In early BC a lot of articles were still stuck in classic.
I always check WoWwiki first even for items because they usually have pertinent summaries and historical data (such as item ability changes in patches, wowhead often has this data but it is much more disorganised and sometimes requires trolling through a lot of comments). Then I click on the wowhead link if there is one.
A lot of the content of WoWWiki is simply not on a site like wowhead (such as the class articles).