Skip to Content
9-14-2009 @ 5:08PM
Yeah except 2v2 was the most fun bracket, 5v5 feals like a zerg rush... and 3v3 can be fun but not as much as 2's!
9-14-2009 @ 9:51PM
Except the fun was only 'fun' if you happened to play one of 4 classes...Rogue, Druid, DK, and Pally. Yeah, then 2's were "fun".
9-15-2009 @ 12:05AM
@ Ilnarai hate to flame but the only class that really has a hard time succeeding in 2's is hunter. disc rogue was one of the top comps last season, and dks numbers have went down significantly with the rise of the warrior. the only class that is horribly unbalanced is prot-holy. moral of story, there are more than 4 classes succeeding in 2's at a high level.now, i dont understand what ghostcrawler is trying to say. they seem to have just as much trouble balancing 3's, what with beast-cleave running rampant on anyone not in a prot spec, and especially the current reigning champions of over representation at a high level, rmp. and 2's is by far the most fun bracket, no matter what you play. i had fun playing moonkin/enhancement, which by no means is one of the over played faceroll comps. saying that you have to play something good to have fun is just dumb.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.