Blood Sport: Season 7 - The Death of 2v2 [Updated]

Season seven is here! The new season brings the same familiar arena combat that we've come to know, love, and sometimes hate. However, the season of the Relentless Gladiator also has many meaningful changes for arena enthusiasts.
- Abandonment of 2v2 bracket rewards.
- New ratings requirements on gear.
- Match Making Rating - is it still busted?
Before season seven had started, 2v2 rewards were slated to be completely cut. 3.2 patch notes indicated that Relentless Gladiator gear could only be purchased if a player met the requirements with their 3v3 or 5v5. 2v2 teams, however, could still be used to purchase the previous season's gear (Furious Gladiator gear).
This change, of course, would have nullified almost all important benefits of 2v2 other than getting points each week. A player who played lots of 2v2 would still need a 3v3 or 5v5 in order to spend the arena points they accumulated with their 2v2. Cruel and unusual punishment indeed!
After a great deal of public outcry, Blizzard rethought their model for 2v2. Bornakk explained that Blizzard had reflected on their view of 2v2 and opted for a change. He detailed that the development team recognized that many players prefer to play in the 2v2 bracket; Blizzard is still going to allow the 2v2 bracket to grant access to the current level of gear with three exceptions: Relentless weapons and Relentless shoulders will not be available for purchase, and players will not qualify for end-of-the-season rewards unless they earn the appropriate rating in 3v3 or 5v5.
So, there we have it. Relentless Weapons and Shoulders are no longer able to be purchased with team rating / personal rating from 2v2s. Gladiator titles and 310% speed Relentless Gladiator Frost Wyrms will not be given out for 2v2 either. Blizzard's iron hand is falling swiftly on 2v2.
Update: Players can buy tier one PvP weapons with a 1800+ Team Rating / Personal Rating in 2v2. Titles such as Duelist, Rival, and Challenger might still be obtainable through 2v2 (unless Bornakk meant all titles and rewards).
Gear Rating Requirements
Via Bornakk, here are the current personal rating / team rating requirements for arena gear in season seven:
- No Rating Required:
- Deadly Bracer
- Deadly Belt
- Deadly Boots
- Deadly Neck
- Deadly Ring
- Deadly Cape
- Deadly Trinket
- Furious Bracer
- Furious Belt
- Furious Boots
- Furious Neck
- Furious Ring
- Furious Cape
- Furious Trinket
- Rating Required:
- 700+: Furious Relics
- 800+: Furious Gloves
- 900+: Furious Legs
- 1000+: Furious Chest
- 1100+: Furious Helm
- 1200+: Relentless Bracer (honor)
- 1250+: Relentless Belt (honor)
- 1300+: Relentless Boots (honor)
- 1350+: Furious Shoulders
- 1400+: Relentless Gloves
- 1450+: Relentless Neck (honor)
- 1500+: Relentless Ring (honor)
- 1550+: Relentless Legs
- 1600+: Relentless Chest
- 1650+: Relentless Trinket (honor)
- 1700+: Relentless Wands/Relics/etc
- 1750+: Relentless Cape (honor)
- 1800+: Relentless Weapon - lvl245
- 1900+: Relentless Helm
- 2000+: Relentless Shoulders
- 2200+: Relentless Weapon - lvl258
- 2300+: Relentless Tabard
There are still no "battleground-only weapons."
You'll have to wait until Cataclysm for those. You still need a 1800+ personal rating / team rating (in addition to honor and arena points) to get any level 80 PvP weapon. Hateful, Deadly, and Furious Weapons are no longer able to be purchased by any means.
What's that? Tier-two relentless weapon (ilvl 258) only requires 2200 rating? Didn't last season have a 2350 rating requirement on tier-two weapons?
Season six was somewhat problematic for rating requirements on tier-two furious weapons. The items in question were boosted from a 2200 requirement to 2350, as it was apparent that rating inflation had become a significant problem. However, Crygil mentioned this would be a season-six-only thing; in season seven, and onward, the requirement would be lowered to reflect a more balanced match making rating system.
The match making rating system was supposed to change at the end of season six.
Many high-end arena players report match making rating losses of 200-300+ points in 3v3 and 5v5 from the end of season six to the beginning of season seven. However, 2v2 match making ratings seem to be affected very little, if at all. The players describing large MMR losses are at the top of the arena ladders; some teams are hundreds of points below the rating they had when they ended season six.
It should appear quite surprising then to learn that there are 3v3 teams already in the 2800s -- the highest 3v3 team last season was rated 3016. That's a difference of just ~200 points, and it's only the third week of the season!
Blizzard's attempt to recalibrate the system appears to be removing copious amounts of superfluous match making rating points from the proverbial "top of the arena pyramid" rather than changing the way the MMR system actually works.
The system is probably due for some changes; we'll likely see that some time this season. Regardless of whether we see any differences in how MMR is calculated, season seven looks to be a promising and exciting time in WoW's arena history.
Want to ascend the arena ladders faster than a fireman playing Donkey Kong? Check out WoW.com's articles on arena, successful arena PvPers, PvP, and our arena column, Blood Sport.Filed under: Items, News items, PvP, Wrath of the Lich King, Blood Sport (Arena PvP), Arena






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Dude Sep 16th 2009 1:04PM
Discrimination! Ghostcrawler promised me a 2v2!
Athlete Sep 16th 2009 1:18PM
Why is this being reported on now?
PvPers have known this for weeks and the season is already 2 weeks in...
Shouldn't a story like this have been published the morning the season started or the day before?
Bravofox Sep 16th 2009 1:30PM
I actually didn't know some of the items on the list (not a PVPer afterall) and think it was a great article.
On the other hand... if the article doesn't cover what you want, why not just move along? No need to toss stones. Just move on to the next topic and read-on my fellow co-player.
swampsquatch Sep 16th 2009 1:31PM
It is being reported now because they just got a blogger/columnist/writer to start the "Blood Sport" column back up.
To Moore, good column. My only complaint is the title should have had "Blood Sport" in it so it is easily identifiable... just my two cents anyway...
Captn Obvious Sep 16th 2009 1:43PM
You are right, information regarding season 7 has been extremely difficult to find anywhere outside the blue posts and Arena Junkies.
What I would have thought would have been newsworthy is the drastic drop in middle tier arena gear rating requirements. Deadly gear last season, the pieces required the following:
1250+: Deadly Relics/Idols/Librams/Totems
1300+: Deadly Gloves
1350+: Deadly Legs
1400+: Deadly Chest
1450+: Deadly Helm
1500+: Deadly Shoulders
This means for the casual arena junky, the availability of middle tier items has been greatly increased, with the high tier gear (furious) in 6 being made available at 1400+ whereas now it is 1200+.
It seems like there is massive required rating point drop across the board, so if it is only high level players being affected by the moderation (I think this makes sense), then this is a big + for the casual arena person and it has been a big incentive for me to get into this season.
Meijnrr Sep 16th 2009 7:31PM
I did not know any of these changes had happened. I'm also really glad the new columnist is doing this column as it will help me with my first real PvP season.
Gnosh Sep 16th 2009 1:26PM
I wouldn't call 2v2 "abandoned". "Shut down", certainly, but I'm not sure it's the right term for something people just WON'T SHUT UP about.
Aaron Sep 16th 2009 1:29PM
Just as a heads up I believe there is no rating requirement for the deadly relic/libram/idol. I bring this up because as a holy paladin I was thrilled to pick up the only libram at level 80 that affects my FoL instead of HL without worrying about an arena ranking :)
Siaperas Sep 16th 2009 1:34PM
I have to tip my hat to somebody who introduces himself by quoting "Conan the Barbarian." Good luck this season! May you find "what is best in life."
Siaperas Sep 16th 2009 1:39PM
I tip my hat to anybody who can introduce his himself by quoting "Conan the Barbarian." I look forward to reading more articles. May you find, "what is best in life."
Siaperas Sep 16th 2009 1:41PM
Sorry about the double comment. For some reason the first one wasn't showing up :(
Apologies everybody.
Mitch Sep 16th 2009 1:45PM
Just a heads up, you can get 1800 weapons from 2v2, not the 2200 weapon.
krynskyt Sep 16th 2009 1:52PM
WHOA now... let's re-read the blue post
"not qualify for the Gladiator title/rewards "
I've seen quite a few posts on the forums in regards to this, the prevailing though is that this means
2v2 will not qualify for the Gladiator Title (and flying mount reward). Other titles still avilable.
Also see my recent article on how 2v2 is doing just fine in Season 7
http://blessingofmight.blogspot.com/
Chowdah Sep 16th 2009 2:08PM
Websites are reporting that the rating requirement for Relentless Wands/Relics etc is 1700, but in game it's actually 1800; anyone know if it's too high in game, or if the outside information is wrong? Also, just to clarify, the ilvl 245 weapons at 1800 rating are purchasable with 2s rating; it's the highest level weaps which require 3s or 5s rating.
jellyphish Sep 16th 2009 2:19PM
While I agree with Athlete that this information is a little dated for those who actually care, it's nice to see wow.com giving some love to PvP. I'd like moar Moore...
Flad Sep 16th 2009 5:17PM
I would change "Abandonment of 2v2 bracket rewards." This makes it sound like there will no longer be any rewards available for 2v2 players, which as discussed later in the article, is definitely not the case. Perhaps "Restrictions of 2v2 bracket rewards" or "Some items removed from 2v2 bracket rewards."
Beruza Sep 16th 2009 11:57PM
The formula that you linked says for players/team rating of less than 1500 points is:
[.22 x Rating + 14]
I dont understand this. When the season first started, (with a rating of 0) I was going up at most 47 points per win. Now, my rating is currently about 750, and my team and personal rating only go up about 3-17 points per win.
Can somebody clarify this please? Did the formula change?