Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-13-2009 @ 11:19PM
maybesew said...
The change to scorch is pretty great, but it now makes that glyph pretty lame. 20% damage on a spell that you'll be casting every 30 seconds and doesn't hit hard in the first place.
Reply
10-13-2009 @ 11:31PM
devinbrady84 said...
I'd bet serious money that the goal is making Fire a viable PvP spec with the Scorch Glyph. It's a step in the right direction.
10-13-2009 @ 11:42PM
Charlie said...
There was a post on EJ that someone did some quick sims with a LB/Pyro/Scorch rotation. With Scorches higher crit rate and faster cast times its pretty close to Fireball and FFB.
Scorch = lower damage than fireball. But you'd be getting in more Hot Streak procs per encounter.
Anyone else think its kinda insane (and also awsome) that mages are getting close to 5 viable PvE Specs? (Arcane, Fireball, FFB, and now possibly Scorch and Frost).
10-14-2009 @ 12:41AM
Frank said...
@Charlie: yes indeed, i DO think it's awesome! more survivability in PvP for me as a fire mage makes me very very happy indeed.