Skip to Content
10-19-2009 @ 3:09PM
I agree that warriors need to be updated with a real AoE, and maybe give Fury warriors an ability that hits a single target with both weapons, or similar.Also, while we're wishing for ponies, a battle stance interrupt would be swell. The whole stance thing is a bummer - instead of limiting abilities by stance, maybe you could limit them by what combination of weapons/shield you have equipped. Make Pummel unusable when you have a shield equipped to avoid tanks having two interrupts, for instance. But in general having abilities that are only available in one stance - when warriors have two DPS stances - is just overly complicated. Arms warriors shouldn't need to drop their rage to Pummel or use Recklessness, and I'm sure Fury warriors can think of an example in the other direction.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.