Officers' Quarters: Partners in crime

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

10-27-2009 @ 1:12PM

Jimbo said...

I appear to be in a minority, but I disagree with the blog. Husband and wife Players A & B can both use an item and roll on it and Player C rolls too. Player A wins the roll.

It does NOT MATTER whether the loot goes to Player A or Player B, Player C LOST THE ROLL.

Everyone has a 1 in X chance of winning. Player C's chances of winning are still 1 in 3. His win chances did not change. While you may argue that Player A's chances are 2 in 3, that's only valid if you grant that Player B's chance of winning is 0 in 3.

The only way this becomes unfair imo is for some reason you don't count the winner's roll if he passes the item on. But I can't picture why a raid leader that would do that.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.