[1.Local]: One sick puppy

Why, oh why, are the wolves of Northshire Abbey getting sick? Has swine flu gone to the dogs? Could it be something even more cataclysmic?!
(cutaia): It all makes sense now! The letters W, O and E are the 23rd, 15th and 5th letters of the alphabet. On 5/15/23, Johnny Walker was born -- not the brand of scotch, but the Indian actor. In 1954, Mr. Walker starred in Taxi Driver. In 1976, Robert De Niro also starred in a movie called Taxi Driver. Twenty years later, Bobby D. appeared in Sleepers with ... that's right, Kevin Bacon.
...I don't think I'm doing this right. :(
More of this week's (astute?) observations from our readers, after the break.
| The future of the Horde Ready to dig in? You simply can't beat a post about lore for all-hands-on-deck comments. Amaxe: Seems to me (and I'm only experiencing Horde-side through a level 80 I switched for an RP spying mission, so I may encounter more later which changes my mind) that Northrend forces have been following Garrosh and seem to be loyal to him personally, and loyal to "The Warchief" more as an abstract. The quest where you administer a blood oath to the Taunka seemed almost sinister to me ... like they were exploiting them to swear blindly to obey the "Warchief" in whatever he commanded. It makes me think of the Japanese army in Manchuria before WWII, where commanders and officers there could enact their own decisions against the decrees of the government and not be rebuked for it. I don't know if Thrall condones what Garrosh does or if he is kept uninformed, but it is interesting to look at Alliance quests and Horde quests in light of the war. As I see it, there are certain factions within the Horde (Forsaken, those who follow Garrosh) who were acting as warmongers long before Wrathgate and seem to be the cause of the war with the Alliance. The problem as I see it is: These groups have been committing acts of war against the Alliance, but if the Alliance goes to war with them, they have to go to war with the whole Horde unless Thrall repudiates them. Ilnara: And I think this is why most Hordies are reluctant to simply follow Garrosh ... We've grown with Thrall, we've seen his plight, and it has softened many of our views on war and this conflict with the Alliance. We rather work an uneasy truce then remain at full war with the allies ... At least, this is how I feel. There are greater threats to the Horde and Alliance than our mutual hate of one another. So Garrosh represents a sort of de-evolution of the way we've come to think and feel about our faction and Thrall's leadership. This reader knows how to keep things in check. Callimaco: The change to Garrosh will not affect me at all. As a blood elf warlock, I run around assuming I run everything, anyway. |
|
| The story of vanilla WoW Adam Holisky's reflections on the story of vanilla WoW raised the eyebrows of some, but most readers appreciated the connections and insights in this piece about the themes of original WoW. Malkavos: This is Holisky in rare form. I really like the idea of the players (groups, guilds, raid groups, whatever) being the central heroes of the story. It's kind of a foreign concept to many of us raised on westerns, Kung Fu and Star Wars, where the hero is a loner or at least a single identifiable person surrounded by his entourage. Many RPGs fall into that same narrative rhythm, but WoW to me evokes the large-scale hero stories of ancient Chinese literature like Romance of the Three Kingdoms or Outlaws of the Marsh, in which the cast of heroic characters expands into the hundreds, each with his own back story and motivations. Alanid: @Malkavos It's even more prevalent in Wrath. (In BC, the NPCs still considered you to be a newb for some reason.) A lot of quests in Wrath are like, "I never thought we'd get someone with your expertise!" "Who in the Alliance hasn't heard of !?", etc. And I loved it. |
|
| Patch 3.3 PTR: Gunship battle impressions Matt Low's description of the 3.3 PTR gunship battle (spoilers ahead – fair warning!) were clear: "High Overlord Saurfang had approached us and began systematically dismantling all of us, one by one. The clothies had no chance. When he was on the tanks, the damaged appeared to be marginal. The tank I was with reported that Saurfang gained a stacking buff that would increase the amount of damage the orc would do. This led me to conclude that a tank would be needed specifically for Saurfang while the rest of the raid was working on the other NPCs on the ship. We would have a limited window of time before Saurfang tore us apart and it was best that he be held off to the side. ... You can't kill Saurfang. When he reaches a certain point, he just lays the smacksdown on the entire raid. We found that out the hard way by pouring massive DPS on him. Nope, didn't work." Apparently, Chupathingy figured out the secret. Chupathingy: When you were fighting Saurfang, that green bar isn't his health -- it's his patience with you. It would be wise to keep that from hitting zero. |
Name: [redacted]
URL:
Subject: gym cancellation in August still getting billed
I was told to come in to cancel my son's membership. I went in August to cancel. I was told I was all set.
I was told this week by my husband that we are still being charged. I was also told that I am not the first person with this problem and that the gym has let several people go for problems like this.
Please let me know how this will be rectified. I appreciate your help.
Eliah Hecht: Now we're a *gym*? Being a video game company, cable company and ISP is not enough for people?
Eddie Carrington: Nope. Looks like we just keep diversifying. I think the next business should we should get into is event planning.
Event planning? Party?!? Come on in ... Drinks are on the house!
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Fan stuff, Features, [1.Local]






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Edmunt Nov 1st 2009 4:07PM
lol love the 6 degrees to Kevin Bacon reference
fearthefireblade Nov 1st 2009 4:41PM
Would you delete your main character to keep Thrall as the warchief?
Think about it.
Chris Nov 1st 2009 5:25PM
I would - in all seriousness - consider a paid faction change.
Lightsource Nov 1st 2009 9:56PM
A quick poll of my housemates says Yes! we all would delete our main characters.
linkers746 Nov 1st 2009 4:43PM
I know I'm beating a dead horse here, but anyone who plays as horde on a pvp server hates the alliance, we really don't want to be at peace with them.
Just saying. (^_^)
As for the other stuff, that 6 degrees reference was indeed very funny. =)
Dart Nov 1st 2009 4:59PM
FOR THE HORDE
lilcasper925 Nov 2nd 2009 9:54AM
Gnomes FTW
Angus Nov 1st 2009 5:22PM
Have you played on 90% of the PVE servers out there? Alliance with a 3 to 1 ratio will immediately swarm like ants if they see a flagged horde player. For the Horde has to be timed to coincide with Wintergrasp...
Randomize Nov 1st 2009 6:19PM
Gnome punting FTW
Sarakin Nov 1st 2009 5:27PM
I freaking love that Saurfang patience thing lol. It seems so fitting for a character that bad ass. I assume the dwarf (Muradin?) has the same mechanic?
Chupathingy Nov 1st 2009 7:23PM
one would assume so, Muradin is a bad ass
paul Nov 1st 2009 5:33PM
Oh man, you guys are starting event planning now?
Finally, been looking for some guys good enough to help with my upcoming 18th.
Does the package include belt giving a speech? cos that would be awesome xD
MusedMoose Nov 1st 2009 7:04PM
Anything that includes Mr. Belt giving a speech is bound to be awesome. *grin*
Alanid Nov 1st 2009 6:08PM
I can understand that the horde and the alliance will eventually go to war, a lot of small infractions eventually accumulate, you get the idea. What happened at the wrath gate is very similar to how battlegrounds work. They're full on war, just factions within the alliance/horde fighting it out for some reason. Eventually all of these would bring the very fragile "cease fire" to an end, especially with Garrosh as the leader of the horde. I would love to see some character development with him, although since I play mainly alliance I doubt I will see such stuff.
tl;dr - bg's are like wrathgate - full on war was inevitable - garrosh sucks
Biskit333 Nov 2nd 2009 12:50AM
You make a good point that the peace cannot last, after all, there are factions of each side that are waging open war, and that will eventually lead to outright conflict. Perhaps placing Garrosh as leader of the Horde is just a continuation of this warlike trend. I think an expansion or patch centered around a real, full scale confrontation between the Horde and Alliance would be a very interesting way to further change the political landscape of the game, and it would certainly be interesting.
perderedeus Nov 1st 2009 8:43PM
What bothers me most is that Blizzard feels the Horde and Alliance should not be allies against a greater threat... but they keep putting in "greater threats." They are basically dumbing down the leadership of both factions by saying they will keep up their war against one another while also fighting Big Baddie #11. No sensible leader would fight a war on two fronts... if something rose up that threatened the lives of all peoples everywhere, it's more than likely that warring factions would (time and time again) put aside their differences and fight the greater evil, THEN go back to fighting each other.
It's sort of a lose-lose situation, though... you can't have the game be entirely about faction vs. faction play, and you can't make two individual threats for both Horde and Alliance. You need the uber-villain... Deathwing, Arthas, Kil'jaeden, etc.
And Garrosh sucks. I also had the opinion that Varian Wrynn sucks, until I saw that comic excerpt. I don't have the link on hand, but it basically shows Garrosh whining and challenging Thrall to a duel, being macho and stupid, compared to Varian speaking to Anduin and saying uplifting things like "when YOU rule, it should be in a time of peace, and you will be a better king than I."
Vaglas Nov 1st 2009 9:09PM
Here is your link buddy:
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/1292/garroshvarian.jpg
Alanid Nov 2nd 2009 11:28AM
I've always liked Varian and Disliked Garrosh.
Varian has had to deal with so much in his life, 2 father figures and someone like a brother being killed because of the horde, being enslaved and forced into gladiatorial combat, seeing his home being razed, and he still managed to keep his cool, but when Garrosh provoked him in Dalaran he had understandably had enough.
Garrosh was an emo whiny little bitch because he knew that his father forsaken his people with the demon blood curse, when he hears his father also undid this he suddenly forgets that, and thinks that he is amazing and he should be ruling the horde, and that he can single handedly take on the entire world because he's an arrogant little *rudeword*.
Ilnara Nov 1st 2009 10:38PM
Thanks for the Nod! [1.Local] :)
My comments should not be construed as me not liking the current story arc. I think it's supposed to make people take stock of what they both think and feel about the way their leaders are conducting their affairs. One of the great debates of WoW is 'Which Faction is more evil" .. these events play right into this largely player maintained ideal.
If I put myself in the alliance shoes, I find myself agreeing with Jaina's leadership, and being further alienated by Wrynn's seemingly brash, revengeful attitudes. His actions remind me a lot of another Prince, and eventual King of the Human kingdoms who's fear, hatred and lust for war and revenge drove him to madness - and to eventually become one of the greatest enemies to all living beings.
I for one have really enjoyed this story arc with the leaders of the Horde and Alliance.
It is great they way they are making people look around and evaluate their leaders actions - just like the real world.
Malik Nov 2nd 2009 12:40AM
It's a sad, sad day for me. When you said 5/15/23, I immediately thought you were talking about a hunter spec.