Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-04-2009 @ 4:20PM
Karilyn said...
The difference is that they are putting heavy emphasis on the charity aspect.
Oh wait, fine print: It's only 50%
Oh wait, more fine print: It's only for 2 months
Oh wait, even more fine print: It's only 1 of the pets
It ends up coming off as very tacky once you realize that it isn't actually very charitable at all. Honestly, if Blizzard wants to donate to charity, they should do it privately, or hold a proper 100% fundraiser (even if only for one pet). This in-between thing they are doing; it is not in good taste.