In among all of the
"omg fake pets for real money" drama from
this week's announcement, we may have missed something big:
the Pandaren are now live in the
World of Warcraft. The Pandaren are my favorite Azerothian race, even though they're essentially a joke --
Samwise Didier just loves pandas, and he made art for
an April Fool's joke that Chris Metzen loved so much they decided to include the bears as
real characters in Warcraft III. Since then, they've become fan favorites (not least of all, especially for me, because alcohol and ale are a big part of their culture), but we've only seen
hints of them in
World of Warcraft. There was a rumor going around a while back that they would never appear in the game
because China didn't allow depictions of violence against the bears, but that was just a rumor. Still, the Pandaren have existed in
WoW only as a Blizzard in-joke. We assume they're out there somewhere, but until now, no one has ever seen one.
Of course we say "until now" because there are now little Pandaren monk noncombat pets running around, bowing, and
doing magical kung-fu. Does this mean that
the future Emerald Dream expansion will have us all playing as Brewmasters? While yes that would be awesome, not so fast again:
Diablo and the
Zergling from
Starcraft are both in the game as noncombat pets, and they don't mean anything at all (although they were both included in the game before the announcements of
Diablo 3 and
Starcraft 2 -- maybe Blizzard is working on a Pandaren-based puzzle game? Conspiracy theorists, assemble!). And just because we all have
Grunty doesn't mean murlocs are suddenly going to take to spaceships with battle rifles in the official lore. But it's cool to see Pandaren actually in the game, even in pet form, and who knows, maybe we will one day find the legendary realm of Pandaria in our own version of Azeroth.
Tags: announcement, april-fools, brewmaster, conspiracy, diablo, emerald-dream, expansion, kung-fu, noncombat-pets, pandaren, pandaren-monk, pandaria, samwise-didier, starcraft, warcraft-iii, zergling
Filed under: Alliance, Virtual selves, Odds and ends, Blizzard, Lore, NPCs
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Tom Nov 8th 2009 6:04PM
There is also a mini-diablo pet
Tom Nov 8th 2009 6:06PM
Which you have said... I'd like to now delete my comment please :E
NarwhalFrenzy Nov 8th 2009 6:07PM
It's a hint at Blizzard's next-gen mmo, World of Pandacraft!
Rin Nov 8th 2009 6:14PM
This.
A million times this.
(btw love the user name. Got a narwhal tattooed on my right arm, always great to meet fellow fans hehe)
panda4warchief Nov 8th 2009 6:20PM
I honestly hope that one day we will have at the very least pandaren NPCs.
Alanid Nov 8th 2009 6:33PM
I'm looking at Cataclysm... with the opening of lots of new zones it's possible that we may see a few around.
Betherian Nov 9th 2009 3:28AM
They really need to add a pandaren ale vendor in Brewfest at the very least.
Nathanyel Nov 8th 2009 6:07PM
I think this pet specifically speaks against playable Pandaren at any time in the future. Whichever faction they would join, the other one would be able to have them as "pets".
alpha5099 Nov 8th 2009 6:17PM
By that logic Gnomes shouldn't be playable, because we can get Gnome pets from the Winter Feast presents. (We also have human and orc children as pets from the Tournament.) I don't think we'll ever see Pandaren as playable (or even as NPCs), but I don't think it has anything to do with our non-combat pets.
Nathanyel Nov 8th 2009 6:22PM
The winter helpers are a stretch, but the Tournament companions are only available to the fitting faction, Horde gets an Orc, Alliance gets a Human, and represent a young member of that faction.
Snuzzle Nov 9th 2009 10:27AM
That's actually a fair point, and why they made such a big stink over the bugged worgen hunter pets... when they'd never before removed any pet gotten through an oversight, they did remove the worgen. And sure enough, not too long later, we found out worgen were becoming playable.
While I don't think it's necessarily a definite veto (after all, Blizz has been going a lot against their traditional grain lately with faction transfers, pve>pvp, and microtransactions) I also don't think it's very likely we'll see playable Pandaren if they're putting inthis pet, especially with how popular it's bound to be.
Though it definitely doesn't rule out Pandaren NPCs, either as a new faction grind or just flavor NPCs.
Wait a minute, does this mean we'll never get playable murlocs (Murky)? Or gorloks or wolvar? Baw :(
oniryuujin Nov 8th 2009 6:09PM
If the pandaren ever do come to WoW its gonna be an npc faction, which still would be awesome.
drakolord Nov 8th 2009 6:11PM
I want o see Pandaren in game, but not as a playable race. I can see them being a nuetral factions very easily. The trouble is finding a situation where they fit. I think they could work in a Maelstrom expansion; say Azshara decides to invade Pandaria or something.
Envojus Nov 9th 2009 2:25AM
So that China would have a reason to ban World of Warcraft? All i see is "Aszhara = USA, Pandaria = China, Aszhara atacks Pandaria = Capitalist USA atacks China? No thanks.
alpha5099 Nov 8th 2009 6:19PM
I was really disappointed with this article; when I saw the headline, I thought it meant actual Pandaren NPCs on the PTR.
Good point about pets though, I guess you can take them (or some of them) as not really being canon. (There's also the Tyrael pet for more Blizzard in-joke goodness.)
Thander Nov 8th 2009 6:23PM
I don't think Pandaren will ever be added to the game except that pet. There's too many activists that would fight against it. Blizzard doesn't want anymore bad publicity then it already gets about "addiction".
Lemming Nov 8th 2009 6:38PM
Are you serious? Calm down! It's not as if there are warlus-ethusiasts/animal activists going nuts about the Kalu'ak.
I love the conspiracy speculation about why Panderans aren't in the game. How about they just haven't found an appropiate reason to have them yet? Blizzard don't just add races for the hell of it, even though looking at the amount of sentient species on Azeroth, you'd be forgiven for thinking so.
Ametrine Nov 8th 2009 6:41PM
What activists?
xnn Nov 8th 2009 7:34PM
With all the animals we already kill in game, I doubt any activists will actually care. It is not even real...
Rhabella Nov 8th 2009 6:28PM
Screw the pandas, I want a Timbermaw cub for all those nights I spent grinding for beads.