The WoW comic leading into Cataclysm (spoilers)

The Wrath storyline factored heavily into the official WoW comics, albeit slightly late, and continues to do so with the release of the upcoming Thassarian manga. And now it looks like it's headed on a collision course with the storyline to Cataclysm! Ogre-turned-Liefeldian-monstrosity Cho'gall recites a prophecy in the latest issue related heavily to the Old Gods, Mary Sue shamagadin Med'an, and the Elemental Planes. BlizzPlanet has a pretty good writeup of what the prophecy could mean and its consequences down the road, but I'll give you a brief summary here, too.
Of course, I'll toss it after the jump for those inclined to avoid spoilers. Ready?
Cho'gall, empowered by C'Thun, says that when the child of three worlds, Med'an, becomes "of Light" -- dies, in the vernacular -- then the barrier between the Elemental Planes and terrestrial Azeroth will shatter and they'll begin to merge. Well, we certainly know that the merger (or, more fittingly, hostile takeover) happens, so it stands to reason that Med'an will die. I figured Deathwing just did it himself, but I guess there's more to it. It could also lend credence to the rumor that Thrall becomes the new Guardian of Tirisfal, despite Med'an's recent infusion of Guardian power.
Let me get on my soapbox for just a minute here.
To be frank, I like the concept of Med'an -- a mixed-breed in a world where the most we usually get are the result of Rhonin's apparently irresistible charms to elven women -- but the execution of the character has been just awful so far. A character that can use every kind of magic. who happens to be the son of two Warcraft II heroes! How wonderful. That certainly makes everyone else obsolete.
So, no, I wouldn't mourn the loss of Med'an in the way he's been presented so far, especially if it means that someone whose character has been completely assassinated in Wrath -- our favorite Son of Durotan -- can come back to the forefront and be an actual leader... even if it's not just for the Horde anymore.
But this is a consistent issue with the WoW comic, in my opinion -- uneven characterization, exclusive storylines that aren't really that engaging to begin with but still affect the game world, and new characters that act like we've known them forever. Add to that the increasingly unattractive art in the book, like Garrosh's tiny, tiny head and "shoulders" that make up roughly half his body -- I know I already used the word Liefeldian, but I really want to use it again -- and it equals out to sizable difficulty in enjoying the series at all, either in art or story. But the comic is also the only way to experience these storylines in the expanded universe.
So here's what Blizzard can do for us: Avoid confining important storylines to just the comics or novels. We encountered this with Sartharion and the Obsidian Sanctum -- players actually did have a legitimate reason for killing him, but most players have no idea what that reason is. And that's because it was contained in Night of the Dragon, a novel, and never once mentioned in-game. Not in a quest, not in gossip text, nothing. And any player who doesn't read the comics has no idea why Varian Wrynn is back as King of Stormwind or why he's so angry at the Horde. All we need is something in the game.
For Cataclysm, there's so much fantastic backstory behind Deathwing and the Cataclysm itself that it'd be a true shame to have a huge driving force behind it stuck in comic book land. Let's hope that Blizzard feels the same way.
World of Warcraft: Cataclysm will destroy Azeroth as we know it. Nothing will be the same. In WoW.com's Guide to Cataclysm you can find out everything you need to know about WoW's third expansion. From Goblins and Worgens to Mastery and Guild changes, it's all there for your cataclysmic enjoyment.Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Lore, Cataclysm






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Volaro Nov 9th 2009 8:04PM
Perhaps part of the world event...?
nders Nov 10th 2009 7:03AM
Isn't Thrall kinda like the son of three worlds, an Orc Human trained, or maybe not...
Clydtsdk-Rivendare Nov 9th 2009 8:04PM
/clap
Nicely done, and yeah I don't know who Sarth is either. Time to hit up wowwiki I guess.
Clydtsdk-Rivendare Nov 9th 2009 8:05PM
/edit
Yes, I know sarth is a raid boss, I've downed him before (drakeless), just not the lore.
Clydtsdk-Rivendare Nov 9th 2009 8:21PM
Okay, not even wowwiki has his lore... anyone wanna explain?
Luisette Nov 9th 2009 8:25PM
Sartharion is the guardian of the Twilight Dragonflight's eggs: http://www.wowwiki.com/Twilight_dragonflight
vazhkatsi Nov 10th 2009 12:35AM
actually after wrynn came back, both the missing diplomat quests and the brotherhood quests were changed to reflect on why he was back.
Mr. Crow Nov 9th 2009 8:14PM
I get the sense that Blizzard wants to take as much unnecessary reading out of WoW as possible and put all the words in contexts that people would properly appreciate -- if you want to read, read a book/comic book. This is likely due to the response of the gameplaying audience that wants less reading and more playing, since reading isn't fun compared to casting spells or stabbing things. No one loads up Team Fortess 2 to READ.
For my piece, I want more words in the game. I want at least some acknowledgement that Sartharion is a problem and be provided a reason to kill him. Failing that, I'd love to have someone writing the WoW Comic didn't think exposition can only happen through hamfisted dialogue.
kia Nov 9th 2009 8:29PM
I understand, Mr. Crow. Most people I come across in-game really don't care who the lore figures are, or what the lore is. They just want to kill stuff and get purples. The people that do care are more than happy to read WowWiki entries, or get the books and comics, or read fansites - whatever it takes.
snowleopard233 Nov 9th 2009 10:35PM
I don't mind reading or comic books. I just don't like having to read bad ones, which is often the case with these ancillary materials. Blizz just churns out this second rate fiction and expects everyone to read it. As Sacco mentioned, this comic's only gotten worse. Why should I have to pay extra for sub-par reading material just to feel like I'm getting a good game's full story?
ash Nov 10th 2009 6:02PM
This is nothing against you Kia, but I really don't understand people who just want to play the game just to kill things and not read the story. WoW has to be one of the worst games for that type of mentality. FPS games seems more suited toward that type of person. I know when I want to play a game like that I go play another game, I don't expect to do it in WoW.
That's just a long way of saying I like having reasons for doing what we do in game and I do not like removing major storylines to another medium.
Magnett Nov 9th 2009 8:19PM
Please tell me you were talking about Rob Liefeld.
Shade Nov 9th 2009 8:35PM
Course he was. I think he's a little off base though. The comic would need a LOT more pouches to truly fit in a Liefeld world.
SamLowry Nov 10th 2009 12:07AM
Yikes, from Walt Simonson to generic Liefeld clone--talk about a dramatic drop in quality.
And for those who didn't catch it, being considered "Liefeldian" is in no way a compliment. That guy was the worst in a truly awful batch of artists who actually seemed proud of the fact that they never went to art school but honed their craft (snicker) by copying what they saw in comic books.
Luisette Nov 9th 2009 8:21PM
I agree. Although I love reading the Warcraft novels, I wish it weren't a requirement to learning/enjoying the lore in-game. For me, the novels are there to flesh out the details of that which I was already given... not to dump completely new information on me.
Just think if the Arthas novel was all we had regarding him -- it'd be a pretty confusing expansion.
clankoh_site Nov 9th 2009 8:30PM
gasp, and you linked to my article? After gutting Blizzard, Simon Simonson and Richard A. Knaak? Gee. Thanks! O_o
lol
A Nonny Mouse Nov 9th 2009 9:03PM
You're upset that Sacco gave an honest and well-supported opinion, actual journalism, and sullied it slightly by linking to your gushing, unsupported corporate shilling? Nah, even I'm not, he should link as it's professional to provide sources. Thankfully this article provides a much needed antidote to your uncritical, toadying praise and a much needed voice for the many of us horribly dissatisfied with some of Blizzard's choice of writers.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure he didn't come into your article and make a passive-aggressive attack on you for whatever tiny shred of journalistic integrity you might have.
Tridus Nov 9th 2009 9:45PM
Wait, what? He "gutted Knaak"?
If anything, he was kind. Knaak is the worst hack out there. His books are TERRIBLE, Night of the Dragon in particular was so bad that I'm amazed Blizzard actually let it be published.
The Med'an story is also pretty awful. Though in this case the fact that its confined entirely to the comics and doesn't exist in game at all is a good thing. We don't need the game sullied with this crap.
At some point Blizzard totally lost their way when it comes to storytelling.
clankoh_site Nov 12th 2009 2:11AM
A nonny mouse, your comments mean nothing to me. I was joking. You know ... (lol as in laughing out loud ...). Mike and I email each other from time to time, and he supports my news often on wow.com
Everyone has a right to their opinion about the writers, I have mine too even if it bugs you. Yours about Knaak or other writers doesn't bother me, nor Michael's. Again ... my post was meant as a joke.
Meethan Nov 9th 2009 8:30PM
Oh please... Oh please kill Med'an! I BEG OF YOU WARCRAFT COMIC.
But onto the point of exclusive things. Yes, it is a tad unfair. It's like comic books with tie ins but BAD comic books with tie ins that don't explain anything even in the narrative. I'm not saying WoW is evil for doing this, but give us non-readers at least a pinch of insight. We're not asking for recapping every event, you can have suprises, but show us the major part of the story.