Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-24-2009 @ 11:08AM
snowleopard233 said...
I actually would be pretty disappointed if they killed Fandrel, just because it’s what everyone’s expecting and wants. Wow, we have one leader that isn’t all sunshine and kisses therefore they are going mad and corrupt and must die. I like Fandrel because he actually is a leader in these tough times. Tyrande is just sitting in her temple and waiting for her boyfriend and Malfurion is just being as perfect and untouchable as always. Fandrel’s making tough decisions like building a new world tree and working to rid the continent of the horde. In hindsight, teldrassil doesn’t seem like such a great idea, but could you really expect the man to just let his people just shrivel up and die without a home or immortality?
Fandrel’s a jerk and he’s not likeable, but he actually gets stuff done and he illustrates he does have more cunning and intelligence than Garrosh and Varian combined. It would be nice if a character that was a bit rebellious and unlikeable wasn’t turned into a raid boss for once. Let’s get some more of that moral ambiguity back in Warcraft for once.