Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-07-2009 @ 3:09PM
Rich said...
The other problem is the need for tanks drops when you get into 25 mans.
5 man = 1 tank
10 man = 2 tanks
25 man = 2-3 tanks
so going from 5 to 10 man, you double the people and you double the needed tanks, but when you go from 10 to 25 man the number of tanks doesn't scale in a similar way.
So it creates limited number of tank slots. Which means the best ones get the slots, but the ones who came in late or are new can't prove themselves unless the attrition rate of tanks is high enough.
Reply
12-07-2009 @ 3:12PM
Tridus said...
This, exactly. The ratio of tank to total group size goes like this:
1:5
1:5
1:8.3 (assuming 3 tanks in your typical 25 man)
Its a similar problem in reverse for healers, 25 mans have proportionally more healers then 5 mans and many 10 mans (some use 3 healers which evens it out some).
12-07-2009 @ 4:56PM
uncaringbear said...
The flip side to having a limited number of tanks in 25 mans is that the instances are a veritable loot pinata for tanks. With less competition to roll against, the tanks are always bathing in loot. Tanks are absolutely spoiled in this regard.
The reverse is true for healers. Suddenly we go from 2 healers (maybe 3) in 10 mans, to 5 healers in 25 mans. Combine that with DPS often rolling on our gear, and it's hardly surprising that our main healers have such difficulty cracking the guild's top 10 gear list.
12-07-2009 @ 5:13PM
Nirva said...
If this is the case (which I believe it is, to an extent), then it just further separates the gap between tanks into those which have 245+ loot and those still with uldduar/badge loot, again leaving a select few for end-game content.
12-07-2009 @ 5:35PM
Nirva said...
(side note) the ratio for 5/10 mans is 1:4 not 1:5. 1 tank for 4 others = 5 people)
12-07-2009 @ 7:15PM
Malachi said...
@Nirva
No, its 1:5. 1 in 5 is a tank in a 5-man & 10-man. 1 in ~8 is a tank in 25-man.
12-07-2009 @ 7:33PM
Angus said...
TotC should be done with 2 tanks in fights 2 and 4, none in 3, and 3 in fights 1 and 5.
Sad thing is this ratio can remain in 10 or 25 man.
When there is no real difference in the number of a slot but you add 15 players, you are asking for a problem with how that slot interacts on other levels.
I could spend a week in 5 mans and never be bored. I can actually sit out fights with our other capable tanks in totc.
Healers, not so much because they seem to be a minimum of 1 per 5 people.
12-07-2009 @ 7:54PM
Rollo said...
Nirva is correct, 1/5 or "one in five" is the same as 1:4 or "one to four." We get the meaning anyway though. :)
12-07-2009 @ 7:54PM
Teaspoon said...
Malachi, nope. 1:5 means a *ratio* of one tank *to* five non-tank players, which is a six-person group. 1/5 would be correct as that's a *rate* of one tank *out of* five players.
12-08-2009 @ 12:32AM
Tyrannius said...
"The reverse is true for healers. Suddenly we go from 2 healers (maybe 3) in 10 mans, to 5 healers in 25 mans. Combine that with DPS often rolling on our gear, and it's hardly surprising that our main healers have such difficulty cracking the guild's top 10 gear list."
What do you mean suddenly, uncaringbear? Everything stays the same.
1/5 are healers in 5 mans.
2/10 are healers in 5 mans.
5/25 are healers in 5 mans.